Jump to content
Untouchable

Baldy on Darnold vs Falcons

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Matt39 said:

There's a middle ground between putting him in Canton based off of Baldinger who loves everyone breaking down preseason passes and saying he sucks.

#backtracking 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

They do?  They went to a Super Bowl a helluva lot more recently than the Jets.  

And their experiment could actually work.  Pairing Kingbsury with Murray is going to be a lot of fun to watch.  It's certainly more interesting than several other current HC/QB duos like Patricia/Stafford, Taylor/Dalton, Marrone/Foles, Flores/Fitz/Rosen, Vrabel/Mariota and Jay Gruden/Keenum/McCoy/Haskins.  

They do suck.  And will suck this year. 

Kind of why they had the number 1 pick in the draft.  It wasn't a consolation prize to finishing 2nd in the SB 11 years ago.

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Matt39 said:

I’ll always be in favor of increasing the odds for landing the most important position in sports over drafting a defensive tackle. It’s certainly unorthodox, but it makes some sense. I didn’t want the Jets to move on from Darnold, but the Cardinals made the right call with Murray/Rosen.

So let me get this straight, you arent saying they should move away from Darnold while praising the Cards for moving away from Rosen and not increase their odds with two QBs?

And drafting two QBs is a mindless waste of draft picks.  

Then again if you werent sure what you were watching in Darnold why would you know more watching two QBs split playing time?  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Matt39 said:

Why? The Jets didnt draft Mahomes or Watson because of Hackenberg. 

You have no idea that this is true.  No one does.  They didn't like them enough at 6. Most didn't.  They were wrong, doesn't change whthat they weren't drafted.

And of course it has nothing to do with drafting another first round QB after trading assets to move to the 3rd spot to draft a QB, getting the QB almost all considered the best QB in the draft and in years and then using another 1 on another QB.  Just for the f of it. 

Not even close to the same thing. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Matt39 said:

They didn’t have a chance to draft Murray. He went 1 overall. 2 picks higher than Darnold went. 

The Jets haven’t won a Super Bowl in 50 years. Sam Darnold’s 13 games (benched for 4) shouldn’t have prevented them from taking a QB they may have liked. Taking a QB until you find one is the only solution. 

WTF is this nonsense?  If you believe any of this, arent just trolling you need to get help

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Peace Frog said:

There is STILL a dude here who thinks Darnold’s biggest issue is inaccuracy. 

True story. 

Quite true.

He also swore that Darnold had a "noodle arm" a Chad arm, who couldnt make all the throws.

And of course loved P Ramsey as a QB to prove his QB knowledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

Drafting another is just a hypothetical at this point.

Its not even close to being a hypothetical for another 4 years at best

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...