section314 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Just curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freemanm Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 I think it was the Raiders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post FidelioJet Posted October 31, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted October 31, 2019 Hopefully an offer like that sets the market for his FA value. Would love to keep him. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryu79 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Could have sworn I saw talk about GB. Imagine Robbie playing in a Superbowl with Rodgers? That would have been something. Also, the first time he didn't come back for the ball, Rodgers would have had at it. Sliding doors. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 minute ago, FidelioJet said: Hopefully an offer like that sets the market for his FA value. Would love to keep him. That's a good point. Robby will have some suitors but I've heard some objective analysts debate whether he is a WR2 or a WR3. There are also at least 5-7 top flight WR prospects coming in the 2020 NFL Draft. Would be nice to see the Jets keep him on a reasonable deal. I don't think anyone is going to overpay for him. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 6 minutes ago, ryu79 said: Could have sworn I saw talk about GB. Imagine Robbie playing in a Superbowl with Rodgers? That would have been something. Also, the first time he didn't come back for the ball, Rodgers would have had at it. Sliding doors. Rodgers typically throws the ball where the WR can actually have more of a shot of catching the ball than than the DB, as opposed to Darnolds last 7 INTS where the WR has actually 0% chance of getting their hands on the ball. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Lock him up for WR2 money. If we can keep him for WR3 money even better. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryu79 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 14 minutes ago, Losmeister said: Rodgers typically throws the ball where the WR can actually have more of a shot of catching the ball than than the DB, as opposed to Darnolds last 7 INTS where the WR has actually 0% chance of getting their hands on the ball. Typically so does Sam, though he def has had placement issues past two weeks. Either way, Robbie's coming back to ball is something I've noticed before we ever drafted Sam. Mind, our qb play wasn't stellar prior to Sam anyway but I've always felt (maybe related to his slighter build) that Robbie could do more on some pics. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryu79 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Just now, Jetsfan80 said: Lock him up for WR2 money. If we can keep him for WR3 money even better. If we can I'd agree. Just would love to add some muscle weight to dude... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 17 minutes ago, ryu79 said: Typically so does Sam, though he def has had placement issues past two weeks. Either way, Robbie's coming back to ball is something I've noticed before we ever drafted Sam. Mind, our qb play wasn't stellar prior to Sam anyway but I've always felt (maybe related to his slighter build) that Robbie could do more on some pics. Of course, Robby isn't w/o flaws. THAT type of WR play isn't his forte... true. he's easily got 2-3 more TDs this year if Sam doenst underthrow him after he has scorched the Db deep... THAT's his game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barkus Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Possibly philly. They tried to get him last yr and with DeSean Jackson out they are missing a deep threat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Jetsfan80 said: Lock him up for WR2 money. If we can keep him for WR3 money even better. agreed !.. only he's gonna be Lookin' for WR1 money cheers ~ ~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 1 hour ago, ryu79 said: Just would love to add some muscle weight to dude... We have been saying that for 4 years. Does he have a thyroid problem? If you take a normal person and up their calories while going on a good strength and conditioning program, they put on muscle naturally. At least a little bit. Does Robby look any different since 4 years ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 2 hours ago, FidelioJet said: Hopefully an offer like that sets the market for his FA value. Would love to keep him. Hard to say at this point. Ultimately it'll be the top bidder that gets him, but getting dangled at the trade deadline doesn't seem to be enamoring any players to the Jets right now. With Robby Anderson, this is further on the heels of not getting an extension last Dec/Jan - while yet-again IR'd Enunwa did get one - even through lobbying hard for one in the media. He's playing this correctly (acting like he's very, very happy he didn't get dealt) in case the Jets are the top bidder in March, or if they make a compelling offer before then. Also just because a team isn't willing to part with a day 2 draft pick doesn't mean one team won't ante up in FA when no picks are part of the equation. Not to mention, until a trade is finalized, they don't have any idea how much it'd cost to lock the player up once they do trade for him. Unlike an Amari Cooper type of player, when Dallas coughed up a 1st rounder for him a year ago, Anderson isn't worth franchise tagging if they can't come to an agreement. Look at Leonard Williams, who couldn't command a 2nd rounder himself, yet is surely looking at a $15MM+/year extension (or UFA contract if they can't come to terms). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 8 minutes ago, varjet said: We have been saying that for 4 years. Does he have a thyroid problem? If you take a normal person and up their calories while going on a good strength and conditioning program, they put on muscle naturally. At least a little bit. Does Robby look any different since 4 years ago? Are you a professional or just talking schitt. Why should he put muscle on him to suit a buncha know nothing fans who couldnt run a 10 sec 40? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: getting dangled plainly false... "New York, at the midway point of the season, is 1-6. It won’t make the playoffs. It’s nowhere close to competing. The roster is littered with holes. Many executives called to pick at the carcass of a presumably dead team." https://theathletic.com/1337685/2019/10/30/hughes-jamal-adams-goes-scorched-earth-on-jets-as-relationship-appears-irreparably-broken/ Edited October 31, 2019 by Sperm Edwards politics 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 8 minutes ago, Losmeister said: plainly false... l "New York, at the midway point of the season, is 1-6. It won’t make the playoffs. It’s nowhere close to competing. The roster is littered with holes. Many executives called to pick at the carcass of a presumably dead team." First, save the politics stuff for other websites. That part of your post is deleted. Second, it is semantics to say we were dangling players vs making it known we're open to offers. If someone somehow offered up a high 3rd he'd be an ex-Jet. If the Jets thought that much of Anderson he'd already have his extension done by now. It seems they turned down the highest offer because the calculation was that a 4th rounder (or whatever it was) in April is not worth stripping their 2nd year QB's receiving corps for the second half of the season. Or put another way, hanging onto Anderson instead of trading him was more about Darnold than it was about Anderson. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: First, save the politics stuff for other websites. That part of your post is deleted. Second, it is semantics to say we were dangling players vs making it known we're open to offers. If someone somehow offered up a high 3rd he'd be an ex-Jet. If the Jets thought that much of Anderson he'd already have his extension done by now. It seems they turned down the highest offer because the calculation was that a 4th rounder (or whatever it was) in April is not worth stripping their 2nd year QB's receiving corps for the second half of the season. Or put another way, hanging onto Anderson instead of trading him was more about Darnold than it was about Anderson. Your right, it’s OK upsetting Adam’s. Quite another doing that to Darnold. If he was dumb enough to do that, the fans should riot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonaldJet Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Supposedly Green Bay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 6 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: it is semantics hahaha you're reading comprehension is too low. ignore list #56 peace. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 18 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: First, save the politics stuff for other websites. That part of your post is deleted. mentioning a hilariously ignorant comment that a politician made is not making a political statement, or having a political discussion, or is your understanding of the language actually that poor? and why can 't I ignore a moderator? you guys god some God complex or something? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 On 10/31/2019 at 1:55 PM, BurnleyJet said: Your right, it’s OK upsetting Adam’s. Quite another doing that to Darnold. If he was dumb enough to do that, the fans should riot. Adams isn't looking for an extension at the end of this year. Anderson is either surprisingly shrewd or he's getting very good advice from someone. Whichever it is, it was a smart way to handle it. Any potential bad blood was instantly vanished by the player. It shows a level of maturity that may yet make him a good amount more money in the coming months. Comparatively, Adams acted like a spoiled child just because his feelings were hurt. I mean WTF -- the team turned down an offer of a 1st round pick. Plus even though he plays one of the lower-value positions, and even though with his presence on the team they still stink on ice, and with the Jets clearly desiring another 1st rounder for rebuilding with someone who matters more than a box safety, the team (allegedly) still drew a line in the sand at a 1st and two 2nds, when just last year they used up a 1st and 3 2nds to get Darnold. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 7 minutes ago, Losmeister said: mentioning a hilariously ignorant comment that a politician made is not making a political statement, or having a political discussion, or is your understanding of the language actually that poor? and why can 't I ignore a moderator? you guys god some God complex or something? It is bringing politics into a football discussion. I didn't say you were making a political statement or having a political discussion -- that's you putting words in my mouth (or your understanding of the language must be decidedly poorer than you accuse others of having). I said save the politics stuff for other boards. There is zero reason to make allusions to a politician (particularly one as prominent and polarizing). Also: I am a god. A god complex is a condition that afflicts delusional mortals. True gods, like we JN moderators are, were here before you and we'll be here long after you're gone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 5 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: I am a god. A god complex is a condition that afflicts delusional mortals. am glad that you took the comment in the spirit intended. but, in all seriousness, why cant a user ignore a moderator? i mean, i would guess that you could set it up so that moderators could still contact any user thru a PM, but??? why not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 3 minutes ago, Losmeister said: am glad that you took the comment in the spirit intended. but, in all seriousness, why cant a user ignore a moderator? i mean, i would guess that you could set it up so that moderators could still contact any user thru a PM, but??? why not? Years ago we anticipated it would annoy you specifically. Duh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockeJET Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Saskatchewan Roughriders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 10 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: Years ago we anticipated it would annoy you specifically. Duh. not completely unfunny, but, still... no actual answer? just curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonCorleone Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 2 hours ago, Losmeister said: Rodgers typically throws the ball where the WR can actually have more of a shot of catching the ball than than the DB, as opposed to Darnolds last 7 INTS where the WR has actually 0% chance of getting their hands on the ball. I can't argue with the truth. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 Just now, DonCorleone said: I can't argue with the truth. spoken like a true Don.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peekskill68 Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 I would try and keep Robby. A true WR1 + him, Crowder and Herndon would be a very competitive group for Sam... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 21 hours ago, Losmeister said: not completely unfunny, but, still... no actual answer? just curious. We are your overlords. You must see anything/everything mods put on the boards so you can't then turn around and say, "Oh I had no idea I wasn't allowed to do ______ because you didn't PM me individually." Come on. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Sperm Edwards said: We are your overlords. You must see anything/everything mods put on the boards so you can't then turn around and say, "Oh I had no idea I wasn't allowed to do ______ because you didn't PM me individually." Come on. I thought all that jazz was already in the user agreement.... In the end, if anyone got bounced from a free sports forum... so fugging what!!! Who cares if they complain? They could go to the Serpreem Court... who gives a rats?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenwichjetfan Posted November 1, 2019 Share Posted November 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, Losmeister said: I thought all that jazz was already in the user agreement.... In the end, if anyone got bounced from a free sports forum... so fugging what!!! Who cares if they complain? They could go to the Serpreem Court... who gives a rats?? Spermee would have been the better typo 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.