Jump to content
Jets0712

Chad Reuter three rd mock draft trade scenario involving Jets

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Jets0712 said:

 

First off my apologies for not knowing how to cut paste things. I’m not that old just stupid with technology. Here goes.....

Jets trade with Denver who gets their 11 and select Lamb. Jets get their 15 th and their 3 rd and 4 th round picks. Jets select O T Jedrick Wills... in the 2 Nd he’s got Jets selecting W r Jalen Reagor.... and now with 3 3 rds Jets select CB Jeff Gladner...... pick 79 C Tyler Biedasz. And pick 83. Edge. Josh Uche....

I would love that draft. Fills a lot of needs.

Your thoughts..................

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

 

Substitute Wills for Wirfs or Becton and I'm ecstatic. Lets stay clear from Bama Busts this time. McElroy, Milliner, Quinnen and A. Stewart have required Rolaids so far.

  • Thumb Down 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t really see the infatuation with Jalen Reagor. much rather pick Lamb at #11 or an OT (if Thomas, Wirfs or Becton are there) 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, UnknownJetFan said:

Not sure Wills drops to middle of the 1st round.

This mock has a ton of talent dropping. Just imagine it being an OT. Not one specific one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's  jard to say if this is good without seeing who else is available at 15. If Henry Ruggs is still there, I would be pissed at picking Willis who imo is in the second tier of OL while Ruggs is a top 3 WR prospect. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Jets can trade down and get an extra 3 and 4 and still get one of the Big 4 OTs......

form stiphy GIF

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, T0mShane said:

Wirfs is the only player I really want 

somebody should alert the local authorities

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CTM said:

somebody should alert the local authorities

It’s difficult to get rear leverage on a man that size. You, however...

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, T0mShane said:

It’s difficult to get rear leverage on a man that size. You, however...

That's what he said 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, T0mShane said:

Wirfs is the only player I really want 

image.gif.92947a05dc411e680876e1f391e53ead.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem I have with this scenario is the trade down.  IN hindsight it is great to trade back, pick up a couple of picks and still get the OT you want.  But in real life, on draft night, we are sitting at 11, and JD has his choice of 3 of the top 4 OTs.  And he trades back.  Don't think I would be thrilled waiting around for the next 4 picks to be made.  Even though group these OTs togetehr as top 3, you have to assume that JD prefers 1 or 2.  Alos, if the OTs start dropping and we trade out, we risk someone trading up to try to jump us and get our guy.  If we are sitting at 11, and the OT we like is on the board, just take him. 

All 4 OTs go in the top 10, or 3 go in the top 10 and JD does not like the 4th, then I am all for a trade back.  But our need for a young tackle is so great.  If our guy is on the board at 11.  Don't get cute.  Just take him.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Lith said:

The problem I have with this scenario is the trade down.  IN hindsight it is great to trade back, pick up a couple of picks and still get the OT you want.  But in real life, on draft night, we are sitting at 11, and JD has his choice of 3 of the top 4 OTs.  And he trades back.  Don't think I would be thrilled waiting around for the next 4 picks to be made.  Even though group these OTs togetehr as top 3, you have to assume that JD prefers 1 or 2.  Alos, if the OTs start dropping and we trade out, we risk someone trading up to try to jump us and get our guy.  If we are sitting at 11, and the OT we like is on the board, just take him. 

All 4 OTs go in the top 10, or 3 go in the top 10 and JD does not like the 4th, then I am all for a trade back.  But our need for a young tackle is so great.  If our guy is on the board at 11.  Don't get cute.  Just take him.

A mock draft is a theoretical exercise, nothing more.  It doesn’t take into consideration the anxiety or repercussions of gms who don’t get the guys they want when they trade down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple issues with this scenario.  

Why are we only getting mid round picks to move 4 spots in the first round?

Gladney is a potential late first rounder/early 2nd, no chance he is there in the 3rd. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...