Jump to content
Sarge4Tide

8 Most Likely Jets Picks at #11

8 Most Likely Jets Picks at #11  

138 members have voted

  1. 1. All 8 of these players won't be on the board at #11, but if they all are, who would be your FIRST CHOICE?

    • Jedrick Wills OT Alabama
      12
    • Andrew Thomas OT UGA
      74
    • Tristan Wirfs OT Iowa
      27
    • Mekhi Becton OT Louisville
      13
    • CeeDee Lamb WR Oklahoma
      7
    • Jerry Jeudy WR Alabama
      3
    • Henry Ruggs WR Alabama
      1
    • K'Lavon Chaisson Edge LSU
      1
  2. 2. All 8 of these players won't be on the board at #11, but if they all are, who would be your SECOND CHOICE?

    • Jedrick Wills OT Alabama
      21
    • Andrew Thomas OT UGA
      29
    • Tristan Wirfs OT Iowa
      51
    • Mekhi Becton OT Louisville
      11
    • CeeDee Lamb WR Oklahoma
      9
    • Jerry Jeudy WR Alabama
      10
    • Henry Ruggs WR Alabama
      3
    • K'Lavon Chaisson Edge LSU
      4
  3. 3. Which of these 8 do you think would be GOOD picks at #11? (Select all that apply)

    • Jedrick Wills OT Alabama
      88
    • Andrew Thomas OT UGA
      102
    • Tristan Wirfs OT Iowa
      101
    • Mekhi Becton OT Louisville
      76
    • CeeDee Lamb WR Oklahoma
      77
    • Jerry Jeudy WR Alabama
      81
    • Henry Ruggs WR Alabama
      25
    • K'Lavon Chaisson Edge LSU
      11
  4. 4. Which of these 8 do you think would be BAD picks at #11? (Select all that apply)

    • Jedrick Wills OT Alabama
      14
    • Andrew Thomas OT UGA
      4
    • Tristan Wirfs OT Iowa
      6
    • Mekhi Becton OT Louisville
      23
    • CeeDee Lamb WR Oklahoma
      15
    • Jerry Jeudy WR Alabama
      9
    • Henry Ruggs WR Alabama
      55
    • K'Lavon Chaisson Edge LSU
      81
    • None would be a bad choice
      27


Recommended Posts

Anyone of those players besides K'Lavon Chaisson....that would be a total disaster. Especially 1 year removed from having the opportunity to draft an edge rusher last year. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Realistically all 8 are good picks for us at #11 I wouldn't be mad if we left the draft with any of them

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I screwed up and picked my top four instead of, you know, actually following instructions. 😕 

Rest assured, I think CeeDee Lamb would be a fine pick at #11. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, freestater said:

You come up with some really well thought out polls, Sarge. I'm sure they take quite a bit of time to come up with. Just want you to know that your efforts are appreciated. Yours, KRL's and a few others' threads on this site are a "must open". Very good job on this one too. Thank you. 

Agreed

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, jgb said:

Alright brown noser, no need to suck the guy's poll.

LET THE MAN SPEAK!!!!!

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, long time suffering Jets f said:

It's really all dependent upon what the Jets do in FA. My overall  first pick is Andrew Thomas  but if they sign the likes of Conklin/Thuney, I would lean towards my 2nd choice of CeeDee Lamb.

Good point!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gastineau Lives said:

I'm gonna start calling OP "Quinnipiac "

I prefer "Gallup"

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nico002 said:

Becton scares me

Agreed

I don’t see much middle ground there.

Either he’s going to be an all-pro caliber player for a decade or he’ll be out of the league in a few years.

Thomas is still far and away my top choice. Hopefully teams fall in love with the upside of dudes like Becton and Wirfs and Thomas falls to #11.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nico002 said:

Becton scares me

Hes Yuge, but I think he winds up as a RT or G. I dont see a guy that big being quick enough at LT. He'll wind up a supersized Damien Woody. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, New York Mick said:

Any top OT then WR then ED then OG/OC

So help me, if the Jets take a center with the 11th pick in the draft...

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said:

So help me, if the Jets take a center with the 11th pick in the draft...

I’ve always said I’d rather take the best IOL or S if it’s a needed position then take the 5th best OT. I would take a OT first then WR, ED then OG/OC. There’s almost zero chance of the top OT, best WR(s) and ED being gone before 11 but if they are I’d rather take the best IOL then. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, freestater said:

You come up with some really well thought out polls, Sarge. I'm sure they take quite a bit of time to come up with. Just want you to know that your efforts are appreciated. Yours, KRL's and a few others' threads on this site are a "must open". Very good job on this one too. Thank you. 

Big +1.  Sarge is a very solid contributor to this community.  

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sarge4Tide said:

So, to me at least, it seems like there are 8 legitimate possibilities for the Jets to pick at #11.  Of course some of the 8 will be off the board and we all know the Jets and they will likely take some random player we never heard of, but assuming that there are at this point 8 very likely names the Jets might pick, what are your thoughts on those 8 players?

I  am going to answer this using a baseball tone.

Thomas or Wirfs would be a Home Run.  Wills at Guard will be another Home run.   Lamb and Jeudy would be a triple and only because the OT is a bigger need and there are not too many of them that has first round grade.  Chiasson would be a double since having an outside rusher on the edge is a need.  Now Ruggs right now is a single just because I need to watch more tape on him.  Why wasn't he the number 1 receiver at Alabama if he was that fast.  And Becton for me is a Strike Out.  I don't believe he is a quality OT right now. So much development on his feet movement and needs to learn how to drive the opposing player. 

Note:  I would of substituted Becton with Josh Jones.  Now that would be a better quality OT but Excellent Post. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade DOWN !..

😎

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather have the 1st or 2nd ranked WR on the board as opposed to the 4th or 5th ranked OL. The OL can be addressed adequately in FA where the Jets are not "forced" to take the next available OL at #11.  

A defensive player at ANY position CANNOT be the pick at 11 under any circumstances. 

 

  • Upvote 3
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope the Jets wait until the 2nd or 3rd round to grab a WR.  The first pick should be an OT, preferably LT, either with the 11 pick or later with a trade down.

Then, in the second round, look at WR or C. A lot there depends on who is available.

If they do end up going WR in the first, then the second and third round picks (all 3) should be best OL available, with an OT and C among the three.

We need at least two OL from this draft who can start from day one.

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I knew enough( like football smarts, injury prone?,wanting to win etc.) about all the options presented, would never pretend I did. That being said it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know no matter who plays Qb he must be protected. The more picks the better too, so I'm split between a worthy LT/OL, and trading down. If there is no worthy LT or C I trade down for picks and get another OL etc. and WR at least in this WR rich bunch.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If all OL at 11 I really believe that JD trades down like 5 spots and adds more picks.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, New York Mick said:

I’ve always said I’d rather take the best IOL or S if it’s a needed position then take the 5th best OT. I would take a OT first then WR, ED then OG/OC. There’s almost zero chance of the top OT, best WR(s) and ED being gone before 11 but if they are I’d rather take the best IOL then. 

There should be a 0.0% chance of taking a center at #11 no matter how cuddly he is. That's a move for a contender that has 2 holes left to fill, not a dozen of them. Even then it's likely terrible value there, as you'd just trade down to get the same player. 

It's not an accident that it's the lowest-compensated OL position. There are like 20 tackles making more than the highest paid center. There's every likelihood that Beachum will cost more this year than any center in NFL history. I'm not sure there's been a single center taken in the top half of round 1 in the last 30 years. 

If the best OL on the board is a center, then trade down or just take another position. No exceptions. Not even if he eventually becomes the best center in football.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said:

There should be a 0.0% chance of taking a center at #11 no matter how cuddly he is. That's a move for a contender that has 2 holes left to fill, not a dozen of them.

It's not an accident that it's the lowest-compensated OL position. There are like 20 tackles making more than the highest paid center. There's every likelihood that Beachum will cost more this year than any center in NFL history. I'm not sure there's been a single center taken in the top half of round 1 in the last 30 years. 

If the best OL on the board is a center, then trade down or just take another position. No exceptions. Not even if he eventually becomes the best center in football.

I’d rather have a Mangold or Mawae on the team then a long shot at another position. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, New York Mick said:

I’d rather have a Mangold or Mawae on the team then a long shot at another position. 

There is no Mawae or Mangold in this class.

I used to be big on Biadasz but his bowl game performance was so utterly sh*tastic that he can pretty much kiss goodbye any chance he previously had at going in the Top 40, much less the Top 20.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...