Jump to content

NY Jets are kicking the tires on a potential Brandin Cooks trade


Recommended Posts

The NY Jets are exploring the possibility of a Brandin Cooks trade this offseason. Here are all the details and what it all means.

The NY Jets are clearly doing their homework on several available options in free agency, the 2020 NFL Draft, and the trade market this offseason at the wide receiver position.

Los Angeles Rams wideout Brandin Cooks is the latest name that is picking up steam.

There have been whispers around league circles that the team would be open to a move but on Thursday morning it became more real.

Jeff Howe of The Athletic revealed that the Rams are open to trading both running back Todd Gurley and wide receiver Brandin Cooks. They’re attempting to “trim salary and restock their draft picks”, per sources.

If Cooks was dealt this offseason, it wouldn’t be the first time he’s been traded in his six-year NFL career.

After three marvelous years with the New Orleans Saints, Brandin was traded to New England for a first and a third in 2017.

Then he spent a single season with the Patriots before being flipped again in 2018 to the Los Angeles Rams for another first-round pick

Over the last two seasons with the LA Rams, Cooks has seen both career highs and career lows:

2018: 80 receptions for 1,204 yards and five touchdowns.

2019: 42 catches for 583 yards and two touchdowns

Per Michael Silver of NFL Network, if/when Cooks is traded in 2020 it wouldn’t take a first-round pick this time around.

Loading video

Cooks is still young (26 years old) and can bring elite speed and playmaking ability to whoever adds him via trade. Brandin has four years left on his contract which averages out to $12.8 million per season and it includes a potential out after 2020.

The reason why the Rams are likely forced to trade Brandin Cooks this offseason is because they’re in salary cap hell. Per Over The Cap, LA has the ninth-lowest cap space available in the league.

On a recent episode of the Stick to Football Podcast, Matt Miller mentioned the NY Jets as a possible landing spot for Cooks that would make sense.

The Jets are desperate for wide receiver help and Cooks would provide an intriguing option that would be a low risk vs high reward kind of move.

A mid-rounder in 2020 or 2021 would likely be enough to entice the Rams into pulling the trigger. Specifically, a conditional fourth or fifth-round pick may just get the job done. 

Also for those curious, adding Cooks wouldn’t necessarily preclude the Jets from retaining Robby Anderson this offseason. The team could add both weapons to help out Sam Darnold and this offense in 2020.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, slats said:

I'm in favor of every tire being kicked. I guess if a deal could be done for a conditional 4th or 5th in 2021 I'd have to be on board, but the WR crop in this year's draft is so deep that I'd really prefer finding a guy in the second who could bring Cooks-like production on a rookie contract. 

At the very least, this will let Robby Anderson know the Jets aren't necessarily sitting on their hands at the WR position until he makes up his mind.  We're not going to be his "fallback option".  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the odds of rookies WRs coming in and given adequate production. Don't feel the same about a pass rusher or tackle. If the price is right hopefully we use that cap on an edge guy like Clowney or a brick wall like Trent Williams. However if they're not realistic pursuits then Cook for one season can't be too bad if Robby can't be signed.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, LAD_Brooklyn said:

That's way too high. They should be happy for whomever take him off their books. Conditional 2021 5th rounder that turns into a 4th if he still on the roster after such and such day. 

Like I said.... the second Leo pick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Adoni Beast said:

Article mentions a conditional 5th that may be a 4th. I definitely take a chance on him for that.

If we could get Cooks and keep Robbie, now we have a potentially potent offense.

Trade a 5th for Cooks, sign Robbie, draft Ruggs

WINNING! 
 

Herndon at TE, Bell in the backfield? Much tougher to put 9 in the box. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jetsfan80 said:

At the very least, this will let Robby Anderson know the Jets aren't necessarily sitting on their hands at the WR position until he makes up his mind.  We're not going to be his "fallback option".  

pretty interesting that there haven't been any real robbie rumors of him going here or there.  sounds like his agent is asking too much.  i wonder if douglas even gave him an offer or decided to sit and wait to see what develops.  i suppose the jets could've made robbie an offer and he declined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jetsfan80 said:

At the very least, this will let Robby Anderson know the Jets aren't necessarily sitting on their hands at the WR position until he makes up his mind.  We're not going to be his "fallback option".  

Cos we'd replace witha guy who is worse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Losmeister said:

Cos we'd replace witha guy who is worse?

I think we can replace Mr 55 % catch rate adequately and for much less than the coin he is demanding.  

Losing the great Robby Anderson would not be a disaster, contrary to popular opinion.

If he comes down on his demands and comes back to us, great.  If not, that's fine too.  We'll survive.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...