Jump to content

OT: I just tested positive with COVID


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Smashmouth said:

no way to prove it either way so lets leave it at that

By Tina Hesman Saey

MARCH 26, 2020 AT 6:00 AM

The coronavirus pandemic circling the globe is caused by a natural virus, not one made in a lab, a new study says.

The virus’s genetic makeup reveals that SARS-CoV-2 isn’t a mishmash of known viruses, as might be expected if it were human-made. And it has unusual features that have only recently been identified in scaly anteaters called pangolins, evidence that the virus came from nature, Kristian Andersen and his colleagues report March 17 in Nature Medicine.

When Andersen, an infectious disease researcher at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif., first heard about the coronavirus causing an outbreak in China, he wondered where the virus came from. Initially, researchers thought the virus was being spread by repeated infections jumping from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China, into humans and then being passed person to person. Analysis from other researchers has since suggested that the virus probably jumped only once from an animal into a person and has been spread human to human since about mid-November (SN: 3/4/20).

But shortly after the virus’s genetic makeup was revealed in early January, rumors began bubbling up that maybe the virus was engineered in a lab and either intentionally or accidentally released.

An unfortunate coincidence fueled conspiracy theorists, says Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University in New Orleans. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is “in very close proximity to” the seafood market, and has conducted research on viruses, including coronaviruses, found in bats that have potential to cause disease in people. “That led people to think that, oh, it escaped and went down the sewers, or somebody walked out of their lab and went over to the market or something,” Garry says.

Accidental releases of viruses, including SARS, have happened from other labs in the past. So “this is not something you can just dismiss out of hand,” Andersen says. “That would be foolish.”

Looking for clues

Andersen assembled a team of evolutionary biologists and virologists, including Garry, from several countries to analyze the virus for clues that it could have been human-made, or grown in and accidentally released from a lab.

“We said, ‘Let’s take this theory — of which there are multiple different versions — that the virus has a non-natural origin … as a serious potential hypothesis,’ ” Andersen says.

Meeting via Slack and other virtual portals, the researchers analyzed the virus’s genetic makeup, or RNA sequence, for clues about its origin.

It was clear “almost overnight” that the virus wasn’t human-made, Andersen says. Anyone hoping to create a virus would need to work with already known viruses and engineer them to have desired properties.

But the SARS-CoV-2 virus has components that differ from those of previously known viruses, so they had to come from an unknown virus or viruses in nature. “Genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone,” Andersen and colleagues write in the study.

“This is not a virus somebody would have conceived of and cobbled together. It has too many distinct features, some of which are counterintuitive,” Garry says. “You wouldn’t do this if you were trying to make a more deadly virus.”Other scientists agree. “We see absolutely no evidence that the virus has been engineered or purposely released,” says Emma Hodcroft, a molecular epidemiologist at the University of Basel in Switzerland. She was not part of Andersen’s group, but is a member of a team of scientists with Nextstrain.org that is tracking small genetic changes in the coronavirus to learn more about how it is spreading around the world.

That finding debunks a widely disputed analysis, posted at bioRxiv.org before peer review, that claimed to find bits of HIV in the coronavirus, Hodcroft says. Other scientists quickly pointed out flaws in the study and the authors retracted the report, but not before it fueled the notion that the virus was engineered.

Some stretches of the virus’s genetic material are similar to HIV, but that’s something that stems from those viruses sharing a common ancestor during evolution, Hodcroft says. “Essentially their claim was the same as me taking a copy of the Odyssey and saying, ‘Oh, this has the word the in it,’ and then opening another book, seeing the word the in it and saying, ‘Oh my gosh, it’s the same word, there must be parts of the Odyssey in this other book,” she says. “It was a really misleading claim and really bad science.”

Finding peculiar features

Andersen’s group next set out to determine whether the virus could have been accidentally released from a lab. That’s a real possibility because researchers in many places are working with coronaviruses that have potential to infect humans, he says. “Stuff comes out of the lab sometimes, almost always accidentally,” he says.

A couple of unexpected features of the virus caught the researchers’ eyes, Andersen says. In particular, the gene encoding the coronavirus’s spike protein has 12 extra RNA building blocks, or nucleotides, stuck in it.

This spike protein protrudes from the virus’ surface and allows the virus to latch onto and enter human cells. That insertion of RNA building blocks adds four amino acids to the spike protein, and creates a site in the protein for an enzyme called furin to cut. Furin is made in human cells, and cleaves proteins only at spots where a particular combination of amino acids is found, like the one created by the insertion. SARS and other SARS-like viruses don’t have those cutting sites.

Finding the furin cutting site was a surprise: “That was an aha moment and an uh-oh moment,” Garry says. When bird influenza viruses acquire the ability to be cut by furin, the viruses often become more easily transmissible. The insertion also created places where sugar molecules could be fastened to the spike protein, creating a shield to protect the virus from the immune system.

The COVID-19 virus’ spike protein also binds more tightly to a protein on human cells called ACE2 than SARS does (SN: 3/10/20). Tighter binding may allow SARS-CoV-2 to more easily infect cells. Together, those features may account for why COVID-19 is so contagious (SN: 3/13/20).

“It’s very peculiar, these two features,” Andersen says. “How do we explain how this came about?  I’ve got to be honest. I was skeptical [that it was natural]. This could have happened in tissue culture” in a lab, where viruses may acquire mutations as they replicate many times in lab dishes. In nature, viruses carrying some of those mutations might be weeded out by natural selection but might persist in lab dishes where even feeble viruses don’t have to fight hard for survival.

Clinching the case for nature

But then the researchers compared SARS-CoV-2 with other coronaviruses recently found in nature, including in bats and pangolins. “It looks like SARS-CoV-2 could be a mix of bat and pangolin viruses,” Garry says.

Viruses, especially RNA viruses such as coronaviruses, often swap genes in nature. Finding genes related to the pangolin viruses was especially reassuring because those viruses’ genetic makeup wasn’t known until after SARS-CoV-2’s discovery, making it unlikely anyone was working with them in a lab, he says.

pangolin Coronaviruses that infect pangolins gave researchers important clues that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is natural.2630BEN/ISTOCK/GETTY IMAGES PLUS

In particular, pangolins also have the amino acids that cause the tight binding of the spike protein to ACE2, the team found. “So clearly, this is something that can happen in nature,” Andersen says. “I thought that was very important little clue. It shows there’s no mystery about its tighter binding to the human [protein] because pangolins do it, too.”

The sugar-attachment sites were another clue that the virus is natural, Andersen says. The sugars create a “mucin shield” that protects the virus from an immune system attack. But lab tissue culture dishes don’t have immune systems, making it unlikely that such an adaptation would arise from growing the virus in a lab. “That sort of explained away the tissue-culture hypothesis,” he says.

Similarity of SARS-CoV-2 to bat and pangolin viruses is some of the best evidence that the virus is natural, Hodcroft says. “This was just another animal spillover into humans,” she says. “It’s really the most simple explanation for what we see.” Researchers still aren’t sure exactly which animal was the source.

Andersen says the analysis probably won’t lay conspiracy theories to rest. Still, he thinks the analysis was worth doing. “I was myself skeptical at the beginning and I kept flipping back and forth,” Andersen says, but he’s now convinced. “All the data show it’s natural.”

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/19/2020 at 9:12 PM, NYallDay said:

 

I’m 33 live with my wife, son of 7 months, mom dad and sister and myself mom and dad all tested positive. Tested on Glenn Island, new Rochelle. Took 2 days for results. I had symptoms last Thursday and Friday but have been fine since Monday.

 

 

Freaking out

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I just wanted to check to see how you were doing.  Hope all is well 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think there will be football in front of crowds this year.   There are rumors that MLB may try to play this season in Arizona with the players basically being quarantined in a hotel and then transported to the stadium for games.  
 

We can debate all day long when the peak is and will drop in the tri state area but this will peak at different times throughout the country.  I can see some restrictions lifted but I can’t see by September 60-100k fans allowed to crowd into a stadium.  Think about the lines we wait in for the home opener every year.  Imagine 5 people at the stadium are positive and how many guys they are close to during the game.  The virus would spread like wildfire and that is just 5 people out of 80,000.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Maxman said:

I posted something similar the other day and I am with you. I don't see it happening. Not this year.  

Vaccine and better testing next year. We get some normal back over the summer. But 80,000 people in one venue normal? That is going to have to wait another year.

That will be wild. I feel like football is such an adrenaline sport, feeding off the crowd and momentum it would be a completely different game with no crowds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Not necessarily.  With no home crowd advantage we might see a lot more road wins.  

Well that's what I meant.  I'm sure superior teams will have a less likely occurrence of stumbling on the road against inferior teams

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Larz said:

God bloodwork today. They guy who drew the blood is a navy corpsman and expects to be deployed to Detroit in a few days.

thank god for people like that 

Most definitely.  Do you think you have it?

 

i wanted to get tested - cough body aches etc but they said tests only for heath care workers and very high risk folks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, batman10023 said:

Most definitely.  Do you think you have it?

 

i wanted to get tested - cough body aches etc but they said tests only for heath care workers and very high risk folks. 

Oh sorry, no just annual physical. We just got to talking. He’s been deployed all over including Iraq. He said NYC reminded him of prior deployments. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HessStation said:

I’m not following this. The 2009 Swine Flu ends at 3,040 deaths. There were 18,449 lab confirmed deaths and an estimated 150,000-500,000 deaths by the CDC.

 

1st 100 days.  its a chart of the rate of deaths in the first 100 days.  It shows exponential growth of Covid 19 outstrips all others listed.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/10/2020 at 7:48 AM, bla bla bla said:

Hey guys, NY and NJ recommend people to cover their face when they go out in public. The Surgeon General released a "How To" video on a making a face mask out of a t-shirt so I figured I'd make these. Skiers and Snowboarders probably have a few of these in their closet. There is no profit being generated from these, they are at cost. 

 

 

Hey please don't post anything for sale here especially something as important as this. We don't sell stuff here and we have no way to verify any of this, it it works, if it is safe. So we are staying out of it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2020 at 9:40 PM, batman10023 said:

My friend moved up to Maine 3 weeks ago to escape nyc.  You must love those folks 

They're having a LOT of problems with people from MYC moving upstate to the Catskills to their "summer" homes to escape the virus. Not appreciated in counties like Greene which does not have one single hospital in it. Same with Florida as I heard from my cousin who's an MD there. Stay home people and stop spreading it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...