JohnnyLV Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 PFFs mock draft simulator is up https://www.pff.com/draft/nfl-mock-draft-simulator There are some unique options to structure if teams draft for needs and how much, how to rank the players with a combo of PFF Grades and Public Grades. Interesting thing is that there is a consistent run on both OT and WR so much so that the pickings get pretty slim at our 2nd pick for WR if we went OT or OT if we go WR. Because of the run, we usually have a choice of a WR or OT but both usually have Top 2 gone already. Here is the first draft I did. Swift is maybe an usual pick for #48 but a lot of value there, despite the PFF grade of the pick. Lemiuex at 191 I thought was surprising value, and I personally like Leake as a fit for a zone scheme. 2 RBs is maybe odd but we may not have a RB on current roster that will be here next year anyway Draft for Needs, Positional Value, Yes, 50 PFF. 50 Public, Less Random 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen Machine Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Position needs are there. Taking RB in round two seems like a reach but I’m still not convinced the line was the only reason for Bell’s lack of production. I think RB needs to be addressed in earlier rds than most might think. It would be a homerun if they could move back in the first and pick up another second to go OT/WR (whatever they didn’t address in later round 1). I like Taylor or Akers in the second as well if they last that long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 This should be fun. PFF’s analytics will push RBs way down while pumping up WRs, QBs and CBs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsons Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsons Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 This site Really devalues rb's . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 28 minutes ago, jetsons said: Liking this draft. Peart at 103 was where this trades hidden value is. Kmet is a pick where we’re deep but will be better due to overall game. Josh Jones is a very good pick.... can compete for Tackle but will be getting ready for ‘21. Love Pittman at 48 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepPep Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 41 minutes ago, jetsons said: I really like this draft. I'm a big fan of Claypool, i would have probably picked him up over Pittman in Rd. 3 and took a CB in Rd. 2 but thats just nitpicking. As you said, this site devalues RBs, no way Gibson is there in Rd. 6. Cephus wont be there in Rd. 6 either. Jefferson will most likely not be there at 158. Normally I'm not on board to draft a TE unless we're taking a flyer on a late round prospect but if we get a chance to get Kmet with one of our third round picks and we trade down to get extra draft picks I really like the idea of getting the best TE in the draft. Been looking at him a little closer and he is a BEAST. Definitely the most complete TE in the draft and while not the most athletic he is really strong and hard to bring down with really, really soft hands. I know people say this about everybody but he is like a baby gronk. I guess I should say baby Kittle. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsons Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 ... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsons Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 32 minutes ago, PepPep said: I really like this draft. I'm a big fan of Claypool, i would have probably picked him up over Pittman in Rd. 3 and took a CB in Rd. 2 but thats just nitpicking. As you said, this site devalues RBs, no way Gibson is there in Rd. 6. Cephus wont be there in Rd. 6 either. Jefferson will most likely not be there at 158. Normally I'm not on board to draft a TE unless we're taking a flyer on a late round prospect but if we get a chance to get Kmet with one of our third round picks and we trade down to get extra draft picks I really like the idea of getting the best TE in the draft. Been looking at him a little closer and he is a BEAST. Definitely the most complete TE in the draft and while not the most athletic he is really strong and hard to bring down with really, really soft hands. I know people say this about everybody but he is like a baby gronk. I guess I should say baby Kittle. I got you Claypool ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 10 hours ago, jetsons said: You are hired!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolloffjet Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 You have to pay to use ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 On 4/10/2020 at 4:16 PM, johnnysd said: Two RB's huh? Other than that I actually like your draft quite a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 15 hours ago, jetsons said: ... Wow this is super cool. I gotta get over there and try this one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 7 hours ago, Rolloffjet said: You have to pay to use ? It’s entirely free 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolloffjet Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Do you have to be on a pc? I’m on my Ipone and this is what it does and won’t let me play the simulator. It goes 2 seconds then the screen goes half dark and can’t click on anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 @Rolloffjet You have to turn off “Prevent Cross-Site Tracking” it’s in settings > safari 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolloffjet Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 45 minutes ago, kdels62 said: @Rolloffjet You have to turn off “Prevent Cross-Site Tracking” it’s in settings > safari That worked . Thanks man i appreciate it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 14 hours ago, kdels62 said: It’s entirely free Please explain. It asked me to sign up as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobR Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 On 4/11/2020 at 7:42 AM, jetsons said: ... This is the reason nobody should take these things seriously. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsons Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 55 minutes ago, RobR said: This is the reason nobody should take these things seriously. nobody does Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobR Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Just now, jetsons said: nobody does Define nobody. Over half the people that post these think they are realistic.....just read the responses. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsons Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Just now, RobR said: Define nobody. Over half the people that post these think they are realistic.....just read the responses. no they don't.... that's just wishful thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 1 hour ago, RobR said: This is the reason nobody should take these things seriously. Depends on the settings. Going entirely by PFF numbers you can end up with Becton in the second. If you move the setting to public consensus, Becton is gone in the top 10. It’s a fun exercise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 2 hours ago, GREENBEAN said: Please explain. It asked me to sign up as well. Did you do the thing in the other post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 3 hours ago, kdels62 said: Did you do the thing in the other post? That would have required me to read the whole thread before my comment to you. I'll try whatcha wrote there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 4 hours ago, RobR said: This is the reason nobody should take these things seriously. oh it's just a bit a fun man. Anyone taking it seriously should have their head examined but I will say that the experience of not having control of where the players get taken does give ya the live feel of not getting guys you hope to grab. I like it a lot actually. This is my first year using the simulators. \ Oh... and I take it VERY seriously! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott dierking II Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 I did a triple trade down in the first round and had what I thought was an excellent draft: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRL Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Pretty good free simulator: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/mockdraft/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardTodd27 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 11. Andrew Thomas OT Georgia 48. Tee Higgins WR Clemson 68. Tyler Biadasz C Wisconsin 79. Bradlee Anae DE Utah I think I just nailed it! But too good to be true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legends of the fall Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Trading down this year would be awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 What draft settings are you guys using? I just had Tua go to the Giants in three straight drafts. That's enough for me to discredit the whole thing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, Greenseed4 said: What draft settings are you guys using? I just had Tua go to the Giants in three straight drafts. That's enough for me to discredit the whole thing. The shoot for PFF 25% on less random setting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted April 15, 2020 Share Posted April 15, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted April 15, 2020 Share Posted April 15, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 if only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.