Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

All fake news though, right?  Nothing to see here.

FFS.

Personally and just speaking for myself if Joe Rogan doesn’t report on it it didn’t happen herp derp

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 624
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dear NFL, Make Him Sell. Please.

BTW. This is the lamest political controversy in the history of the UK.  No drugs. No prostitutes. No bribery. Woody Johnson even sucks at being scandalous. Sell the team! 

Apparently Woody's incompetence isn't restricted to football.    

Posted Images

This team is the gift that just keeps giving. Its like that 7 hour Viagra gone bad stiffy that is both wondrous and horrible simultaneously. Honestly with days like this one and so many more to come who would ever want to follow any other NFL team. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Four sources familiar with Johnson's meetings told CNN the ambassador hosted official gatherings at a posh men's-only club in London, the centuries-old, exclusive White's. Eventually Johnson was told by another diplomat at the embassy in late 2018 that he had to stop holding those meetings, three of the sources said. None of the embassy's female diplomats would have been able to attend.

I mean to be honest I wish I had a membership at a nice mens only social club to relax at the end of the day sometimes. Is that really the ******* name of the club though? Oof. Gotta be real dense to think Whites isn't going to raise a few flags

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bgivs21 said:

This is stupid. Everyone here is having a wet dream because they think Woody will sell after this. Sorry to break it to everyone at JN but he won't be selling

Transferring power solely to Chris Johnson will be good enough for now.  He sucks too, but is the lesser of 2 evils.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bgivs21 said:

This is stupid. Everyone here is having a wet dream because they think Woody will sell after this. Sorry to break it to everyone at JN but he won't be selling

This is a massive oppo dump on several fronts for Woody. IMO, it’s impossible for Goodell—in the middle of his performative woke shtick— not to respond. At worst, he makes Woody sell; at least, Chris Johnson is now the sole owner of the team and will remain so

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SR24 said:

 

Unless they have some credible sources, I will not jump to conclusions.  I will not slander a man's character based on hearsay.  His character is already trashed based on being the Jets owner.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Post of the Week 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, T0mShane said:

This is a massive oppo dump on several fronts for Woody. IMO, it’s impossible for Goodell—in the middle of his performative woke shtick— not to respond. At worst, he makes Woody sell; at least, Chris Johnson is now the sole owner of the team and will remain so

Where is the proof though?  We have "sources" from one front and Woody denying it on the other front.  This is the problem with this cancel culture crap nowadays.  Why should I believe an article with anonymous sources?  

They are doing an investigation I'm waiting to see what comes of it.  My best guess honestly though is this will blow over in a month and a report will come out then saying there was no evidence of wrongdoing on Woody's part.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, southparkcpa said:

All due respect... the NYT has lost all credibility.  The family who owns the NY Times were slave oweners you know.

Why no press there?

This is recent , but if you just google it, they purposely don't print things that don't fit their agenda. 

I don't know what he said or didn't, but it's a shame I can't believe the NYT and CNN at face value. Their reports need be corroborated.

 

https://www.city-journal.org/bari-weiss-new-york-times

 

And which news organization do you trust implicitly because they do not have an "agenda?"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, UntouchableCrew said:

Various diplomats and witnesses: Woody Johnson said racist things

Woody: I hired Herm Edwards and Todd Bowles for christ's sake!

What are the names of the diplomats and witnesses?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, southparkcpa said:

All due respect... the NYT has lost all credibility.  The family who owns the NY Times were slave oweners you know.

Why no press there?

This is recent , but if you just google it, they purposely don't print things that don't fit their agenda. 

I don't know what he said or didn't, but it's a shame I can't believe the NYT and CNN at face value. Their reports need be corroborated.

 

https://www.city-journal.org/bari-weiss-new-york-times

 

You should be fact checking and researching everything any news network says, or reports. Only a fool takes that information and runs with it, all these networks have agendas....

See how mulitple networks with different backgrounds report on it and come to your own conclusion. Don't be a mannequin.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 If Woody had gone to the Police, 

this would never have happened-

 

 The last time I had a Woody problem, the doctor gave me a big needle in my ass cheek full of penicillin and said...

"make sure you put a helmet on that Soldier"!!!

 Before the lock-

Ka-pow! Levels!!!

179623c8d384e31fc04acff2daf93140.jpg

OIP.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Long Island Leprechaun said:

And which news organization do you trust implicitly because they do not have an "agenda?"

None I’d hope, especially without any supporting evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, freestater said:

Happiest man in the NFL right now?

Dan Snyder. 

Maybe this is all just the prelude to the bribery scandal being investigated?   :)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BallinPB said:

Where is the proof though?  We have "sources" from one front and Woody denying it on the other front.

The problem with this type of analysis is that it allows you to dismiss literally any source—no matter who or how many—depending upon how comfortable you are with the thing they’re reporting. At that point, it becomes not “the source(s) vs Woody,” but “the thing reported vs. your prior beliefs.” 

  • Upvote 1
  • Post of the Week 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, BallinPB said:

Where is the proof though?  We have "sources" from one front and Woody denying it on the other front.  This is the problem with this cancel culture crap nowadays.  Why should I believe an article with anonymous sources?  

They are doing an investigation I'm waiting to see what comes of it.  My best guess honestly though is this will blow over in a month and a report will come out then saying there was no evidence of wrongdoing on Woody's part.  

Except he was asked and didn't deny the reports, so there's that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

Hey, you know how the Jets can bury this story?

cjanthem.jpg

The story is buried.  It's a non-story.  Woody Johnson's involvement in the Jets is only financial and our CEO is very much his own man and a complete supporter of the multi-cultural organization he employs.

While this may make some news, it won't affect the Jets at all.

SAR I

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SAR I said:

cjanthem.jpg

The story is buried.  It's a non-story.  Woody Johnson's interest in the Jets are only financial and our CEO is very much his own man and a complete supporter of the multi-cultural organization he employs.

While this may make some news, it won't affect the Jets at all.

SAR I

 

He's even worse!

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Long Island Leprechaun said:

And which news organization do you trust implicitly because they do not have an "agenda?"

Understood,.... but as kids, we looked at the AP, NYT, etc as  meant to be the Gold Standard.  the NYT is basically A tabloid. A shame.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...