Warfish Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 21 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: Alot of Words So the TLDR is that this entity rated Sam Darnold a tiny bit lower than Tim Couch, Matt Schaub, Blake Bortles, Johnny Maziel and JaMarcus Russell? Got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 33 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said: That doesn't play out in the actual results/picks. If it did, Mahomes would have been taken over Trubisky, Lamar Jackson would have been the 2nd QB off the board in 2018, and no one would have invested high picks in the likes of Ryan Leaf, Sanchez, Josh Freeman, J.P. Losman, Jake Locker, or Rex Grossman. Listening to this model would have steered teams away from those guys. If your argument is consensus is basically = to QBASE, that's dead wrong. Is consensus the results of the draft or predraft rankings? It seems like you're using results but what you're not doing in these examples are looking at the individual draft. For example: Stafford was clearly the better prospect and as such, was taken ahead of Sanchez/Freeman. Same for; Manning/Leaf. Newton/Locker. 3 QB's were taken ahead of JP Losman and they're probably all going to the HOF. 3 QB's were taken ahead of Rex Grossman (Palmer/Leftwhich/Boller). In regards to Trubisky/Watson/Mahomes - while they got it "right" per say, they didnt. Based on their ratings they didnt think Watson/Mahomes were 1st round worthy but the league rightfully disagreed. In regards to Jackson; Mayfield went #1 overall. The league still took Jackson in the 1st against their projections of him as a prospect. League still rightfully took Allen. So again, I dont see anything special here but maybe I dont understand what you're comparing this to. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 19, 2020 Author Share Posted September 19, 2020 31 minutes ago, MARTIN said: Its funny how there are so many analytics and metrics to determine if a qb is good or not... bc it doesn't feel like it matters at all. It's the hardest position in pro sports to evaluate and predict. And yet no position in pro sports is more important. So of course people are always going to try to get an "edge". QBASE just does better than most with its model, so its a useful tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 1 hour ago, Jetsfan80 said: Again. Find me a scout or front office that nails their evaluations of QB prospects 50+ % of the time, and can sniff out an eventual bust 75+ % of the time. QBASE would have steered us away from Mark Sanchez (-184), Bryce Petty (-292) and Christian Hackenberg (-414), and absolutely pushed the Jets to draft Russell Wilson (1561) in 2012. It also would have told us Pat Mahomes (656) would be the best QB in the 2017 class, and worth taking at 6th overall. It also would have also told the Jets to draft Lamar Jackson (656) over Sam Darnold (412) in 2018. But yeah, numbers are stupid and stuff. I, and others, will be using QBASE on this board plenty of times going forward. You're just going to have to deal with it. I sh*t on QBASE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 19, 2020 Author Share Posted September 19, 2020 Just now, neckdemon said: I sh*t on QBASE Oh wow you win this round 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 4 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: You're right, math is gay. You FEEL the Jets and Darnold are good, and have no idea why people would think otherwise. DYAR is not strict math there is a ton of judgement involved as well as the defensive rankings they use too. It is a circular stat not a straight statistic/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 On 9/19/2020 at 10:17 AM, MARTIN said: Its funny how there are so many analytics and metrics to determine if a qb is good or not... bc it doesn't feel like it matters at all. This. But we'll be firing up QBASE again around here soon enough. Can't wait to see where Lawrence, Fields and Wilson shake out. Thus far, QBASE seems to have been pretty good on Burrow and Herbert being better than Tua, but again, it's early. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan4life90 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 @Jetsfan80, let's see what QBASE has to say about Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance, etc ! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 2 hours ago, Jetsfan4life90 said: @Jetsfan80, let's see what QBASE has to say about Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance, etc ! It isn’t up yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 3 hours ago, Jetsfan4life90 said: @Jetsfan80, let's see what QBASE has to say about Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance, etc ! Their main criteria is experience as far as I know. Nearly all of their top prospects had 4 years experience. Covid has probably hurt them all to some extent but Lance especially. Lawrence is going to be an excellent prospect for them IMO. 3 full years with great production and success. The others I think will be mediocre at best with Lance essentially being considered a sure fire bust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 6, 2021 Share Posted January 6, 2021 Lawerence will be one and may get slightly dinged for supporting cast Fields will get dinged for games played and supporting cast Wilson- competition Lance- who knows? He’s barely played 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 6, 2021 Author Share Posted January 6, 2021 12 hours ago, Jetsfan4life90 said: @Jetsfan80, let's see what QBASE has to say about Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance, etc ! I'm certainly interested to see what their data says. Lawrence will get a very good score, if only because of having so many starts under his belt and putting up good numbers. Fields' score will be a bit less predictable. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Irish Jet Posted March 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 30, 2021 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimjasi Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 2 minutes ago, Irish Jet said: This should make you QBASE nerds relatively happy. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post jetstream23 Posted March 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 hour ago, slimjasi said: This should make you QBASE nerds relatively happy. Well, based on Zach Wilson's 20.2% chance we should round that up to 21% like we round up 6' 2 1/8" to 6'3". ? 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 On 9/18/2020 at 1:02 PM, Jetsfan80 said: Baker Mayfield (1480) Pat Mahomes (656) Lamar Jackson (656) Josh Rosen (623) Yeah, kind of a toss up as to whether Josh Rosen or Patrick Mahomes will be better. 1 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sperm Edwards Posted March 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 30, 2021 So it's settled then. Let's draft Pat Mahomes. 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Beerfish Posted March 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mogglez Posted March 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Irish Jet said: Been waiting for their grades. Thanks for posting. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFreak89 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 Here is Zach Wilson's write up and scores. To be optimistic, there is a 70% chance that he will at least be an adequate starter in the league. 2. Zach Wilson, BYU (5) Mean Projection in Years 3-5 0.60 TDYAR/A Bust (< 0.0 TDYAR/A) 29.0% Adequate Starter (0.0 to 0.75 TDYAR/A) 26.6% Upper Tier (0.75 to 1.5 TDYAR/A) 24.3% Elite (> 1.5 TDYAR/A) 20.2% Because of Wilson's status as a one-year wonder, there are doubts about how reflective 2020 was of his true ability. And it doesn't help that 2020 comes with questions about BYU's weak, cobbled-together schedule as a result of the pandemic. However, even with the one-year wonder penalty (which isn't too harsh because Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, and Russell Wilson were also one-year wonders), Wilson earns a high projection. Aside from carrying BYU to an 11-1 record, he completed 73.5% of his passes while regularly showing off his arm strength and putting up solid rushing numbers. Moreover, if he is taken second overall as many expect, his projection will be neck-and-neck with Lawrence's at 0.72. Having said that, in addition to one-year wonder and schedule concerns, which we have accounted for, there are also durability concerns with Wilson that are harder to quantify but are still worth taking into consideration. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 I do love me some QBase. I can’t believe people are pretending like Mac Jones can hang with Lawrence, Fields, Wilson. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RutgersJetFan Posted March 30, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted March 30, 2021 I've always interpreted their Bust category to be the most important/accurate probability. Given the margin of error that is a pretty huge difference between Lawrence/Wilson and the rest of the pack. Worth noting that those numbers are not horrible for Fields, Wilson's are just that good, and it does help illustrate how much stronger of a prospect Wilson is. He's quite a bit closer to Lawrence than he is Fields. 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 ^^Also worth noting, I think it's highly likely Fields has the more immediate impact on the league given his wheels. As a long-term solution Wilson is likely the clear #2 guy in the draft. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 6 minutes ago, kdels62 said: I do love me some QBase. I can’t believe people are pretending like Mac Jones can hang with Lawrence, Fields, Wilson. Yep. In this regard, Josh Allen already took the anomaly spot. Mac Jones is going to get someone fired. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullblast Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 20 minutes ago, Beerfish said: So it's not just me. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadienJetsFan Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 On 9/18/2020 at 4:02 PM, Jetsfan80 said: For the 109 QB's above, FO was accurate in their assessment 55 times, a little over 50 %. I can be accurate half the time too. Want sign up for a monthly subscription? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandy Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 Wow these Qbase grades are much higher than normal. Gives a ringing endorsement of Wilson though. On the Fields end its a bit lower, but compared to how their model usually works it's pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 minute ago, Grandy said: Wow these Qbase grades are much higher than normal. Gives a ringing endorsement of Wilson though. On the Fields end its a bit lower, but compared to how their model usually works it's pretty good. I dunno, there have been talks of everyone underestimating the strength of this class for quite some time. The numbers show it's not just a matter of hype, but who knows. It sure does seem like the wacky schedule from the pandemic combined with all of the attention put on Lawrence blinded everyone to it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenFish Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 Chris Simms’ approves of Wilson QBase approves of Zach Wilson Zach Wilson checked the box on the people/data that have predicted QB success the best over the years. Can’t wait to see what Joe D thinks. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdels62 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 19 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said: I've always interpreted their Bust category to be the most important/accurate probability. Given the margin of error that is a pretty huge difference between Lawrence/Wilson and the rest of the pack. Worth noting that those numbers are not horrible for Fields, Wilson's are just that good, and it does help illustrate how much stronger of a prospect Wilson is. He's quite a bit closer to Lawrence than he is Fields. For reference. 2 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shockwave Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 Quote Moreover, if he is taken second overall as many expect, his projection will be neck-and-neck with Lawrence's at 0.72. So Let me get this straight. Lawrence is projected at .73. Wilson at .72. Nearly Identical. Qbase is prediction Lawrence and Wilson as the 9th and 10th best QB's to come out since 2004 ? Kinda shocked Wilson is so close to Lawrence. Also I am shocked Mariota is stuck on the bench somewhere so young. Would love to have him here with Wilson or Fields this year. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 40 minutes ago, CanadienJetsFan said: I can be accurate half the time too. Want sign up for a monthly subscription? Not on QB's you can't. No one can without good data. No GM, scout, analyst, fan, prognosticator, QB coach or former QB can get it right on QB's at a 50 % rate without good data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 hour ago, jetstream23 said: Yeah, kind of a toss up as to whether Josh Rosen or Patrick Mahomes will be better. Almost no one here thought Rosen would bust. Many here thought Mahomes would bust. QBASE having Mahomes with a higher score than Rosen is the applicable point to be made here. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wit Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 I too can make my mock draft and then out phony numbers next to the players to “predict” at a fifty percent rate who will bust. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.