Jump to content

Patriots | Team not likely to franchise Vinatieri


Smizzy

Recommended Posts

Patriots | Team not likely to franchise Vinatieri

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:32:58 -0800

Tom E. Curran, of the Providence Journal, reports New England Patriots PK Adam Vinatieri is not likely to have the franchise tag slapped on him by the team. The team is not willing to spend $3.01 million on him for the 2006 season and must hope to re-sign before March 3 to prevent him from hitting the free agent market

.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Vinatieri is a commercial hoe in New England - he's on TV pimping Ford trucks, Papa Gino's Pizza, Bernie and Phil's furniture and Dunkin Donuts coffee. you have to wonder if the commercial success/money gets lost on them. Anyway, If he must go:

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU! I AM ENTERNALLY GRATEFUL FOR EVERYTHING YOU HAVE DONE FOR THE NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Vinatieri is a commercial hoe in New England - he's on TV pimping Ford trucks, Papa Gino's Pizza, Bernie and Phil's furniture and Dunkin Donuts coffee. you have to wonder if the commercial success/money gets lost on them. Anyway, If he must go:

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU! I AM ENTERNALLY GRATEFUL FOR EVERYTHING YOU HAVE DONE FOR THE NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS.

Well said Garb, and it's time to move on.

If we were Jet fans, we'd be screaming for the Pats to resign him at $6 mil per year just for what he did in the past.

Thank God we are not Jet fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news is there are a couple good free agent kickers floating around out there with very similar stats. The only difference is they haven't made two Super Bowl winning kicks which equates to at least a $1 million savings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news is there are a couple good free agent kickers floating around out there with very similar stats. The only difference is they haven't made two Super Bowl winning kicks which equates to at least a $1 million savings.

Yeah, I hear Scott Norwood is available.

He has similar stats, and he also hasn't made 2 Super Bowl winning kicks.

Good luck with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I hear Scott Norwood is available.

He has similar stats, and he also hasn't made 2 Super Bowl winning kicks.

Good luck with that.

To assume that anyone else would have missed the kicks that Vinatieri made in the Super Bowl is just silly. They were big kicks, but nothing special. The only kick that not many other kickers would have made was in the Oakland game. Scott Norwood is an exception, not the rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Alk, there is a bronze plaque embedded in the parking lot at Gillette - near the pro-shop (supposed to be the very spot that Adam made the kick in the old Foxboro Stadium) - commemorating that famous "snow bowl" (tuck rule game) kick. Kind of cool for Patsie fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To assume that anyone else would have missed the kicks that Vinatieri made in the Super Bowl is just silly. They were big kicks, but nothing special. The only kick that not many other kickers would have made was in the Oakland game. Scott Norwood is an exception, not the rule.

Heck Yeah. I mean look at someone like Vanderjagt. Most accurate kicker in league history, I am sure that when he comes down to a big game, game-winning kick, he will nail it right down center.

Nothing special.

Most kickers make those

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck Yeah. I mean look at someone like Vanderjagt. Most accurate kicker in league history, I am sure that when he comes down to a big game, game-winning kick, he will nail it right down center.

Nothing special.

Most kickers make those

I don't care how you twist it, I'm going to be pissed if we pay our kicker $3 million for next season. Would you be willing to do that? Nevermind, you guys already wasted a 2nd. rounder on a kicker, I already know your answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care how you twist it, I'm going to be pissed if we pay our kicker $3 million for next season. Would you be willing to do that? Nevermind, you guys already wasted a 2nd. rounder on a kicker, I already know your answer.

No one is saying to pay him $3M but at least negotiate and give him what he has earned and keep him on the team, he is after all the MOST CLUTCH KICKER OF ALL TIME (right TX? ;))

You guys (panzies that is) are ridiculous, you think nothing can keep you from being champs as long as BB is still there. Lose your OC, DC, DC#2/BB mentee, get rid of the best kicker to probably ever play the game . . . the list goes on and on, but don't worry you still have BB. :rolleyes:

Talk about a delusional fan base!

How's that Lombardi trophy you won this year w/o Weiss and Crennel? Thought so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were big kicks, but nothing special.

The only kick that not many other kickers would have made was in the Oakland game.

Great points Husker.

The two Super Bowl kicks were nothing special. That's what kickers are paid to do.

The kick against the Raiders in a driving blizzard has to be the greatest (and most clutch) kick in NFL history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying to pay him $3M but at least negotiate and give him what he has earned and keep him on the team, he is after all the MOST CLUTCH KICKER OF ALL TIME (right TX? ;))

You guys (panzies that is) are ridiculous, you think nothing can keep you from being champs as long as BB is still there. Lose your OC, DC, DC#2/BB mentee, get rid of the best kicker to probably ever play the game . . . the list goes on and on, but don't worry you still have BB. :rolleyes:

Talk about a delusional fan base!

How's that Lombardi trophy you won this year w/o Weiss and Crennel? Thought so.

$3 million IS what it would cost to franchise him which is what we had to do last year due to the fact that we couldn't reach an agreement with him. Our SB hopes don't hinge on a kicker. They hinge on putting a decent secondary together, finding a starting ILB and keeping our offense together which would mean re-signing Givens. Vinatieri's best chance at getting a ridiculous deal has passed. His last Super Bowl winning kick was 3 years ago and he was pretty ordinary this season. If we can sign him to a reasonable contract I'm all for it but anything over $2 million and he can get bent. And yes, this team lives and dies with Belichick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$3 million IS what it would cost to franchise him which is what we had to do last year due to the fact that we couldn't reach an agreement with him. Our SB hopes don't hinge on a kicker. They hinge on putting a decent secondary together, finding a starting ILB and keeping our offense together which would mean re-signing Givens. Vinatieri's best chance at getting a ridiculous deal has passed. His last Super Bowl winning kick was 3 years ago and he was pretty ordinary this season. If we can sign him to a reasonable contract I'm all for it but anything over $2 million and he can get bent. And yes, this team lives and dies with Belichick.

Talk about putting all your eggs in one bbbasket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying to pay him $3M but at least negotiate and give him what he has earned and keep him on the team, he is after all the MOST CLUTCH KICKER OF ALL TIME (right TX? ;))

You guys (panzies that is) are ridiculous, you think nothing can keep you from being champs as long as BB is still there. Lose your OC, DC, DC#2/BB mentee, get rid of the best kicker to probably ever play the game . . . the list goes on and on, but don't worry you still have BB. :rolleyes:

Talk about a delusional fan base!

How's that Lombardi trophy you won this year w/o Weiss and Crennel? Thought so.

AV has been the highest paid kicker in the NFL for the past 4 years.

He has earned the money that he has been paid.

There is no way the Pats should tag him and pay him $3.3 million next year.

Paying a kicker $3.3 mil would be the equivalent of drafting one in the 2nd round.

Only stupid teams do things like that.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than AV who is the highest paid kicker in the league, w/o a franchise tag? Whatever it is AV should be signed for more than that, period.

That would be Neil Rackers who is being paid $1.8 million next season. By the way, as it stands, it could be argued that he is actually a better kicker than Vinatieri at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How so? I guess the coach isn't that important, I almost forgot how dominating you guys were with Herm running the circus.

The coach is VERY important, I never meant to imply otherwise and yes we do have experience with a pos coach and what that brings. I was just saying that you guys are becoming the one thing you say you hate about jets fans and that is being delusional. Which you are if you don't think you need to keep key players on the team. Go talk to Tuna about how unimportant a kicker is. Oh yeah, give Dungy a call while you're at it.

And TX, those kicks "may be what they get paid to do" but they aren't always successful, AV was ALWAYS successful on those kicks and that is worth a lot in my book (not $3M but should be highest paid in the league). It's ok you guys disagree, just don't come crying to us when you get knocked out/miss the playoffs because it sailed left or hit the cross bar.

:Nuts:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be Neil Rackers who is being paid $1.8 million next season. By the way, as it stands, it could be argued that he is actually a better kicker than Vinatieri at this point.

I think Rackers plays for Arizona, nice weather there for kickers wouldn't you say??? AV plays in the brutal northeast and drills those mothers through the uprights regularly and in clutch situations. I think he should get more than Rackers but 3.3 is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coach is VERY important, I never meant to imply otherwise and yes we do have experience with a pos coach and what that brings. I was just saying that you guys are becoming the one thing you say you hate about jets fans and that is being delusional. Which you are if you don't think you need to keep key players on the team. Go talk to Tuna about how unimportant a kicker is. Oh yeah, give Dungy a call while you're at it.

And TX, those kicks "may be what they get paid to do" but they aren't always successful, AV was ALWAYS successful on those kicks and that is worth a lot in my book (not $3M but should be highest paid in the league). It's ok you guys disagree, just don't come crying to us when you get knocked out/miss the playoffs because it sailed left or hit the cross bar.

:Nuts:

I do think you need to keep your important players around. Your idea of important and mine are evindentally very different. My idea of important is Seymour, Brady, Branch and Givens, Vinatieri is pretty far down on that list especially if we have to break the bank for him and spend money that could be used to keep one of the players I mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Rackers plays for Arizona, nice weather there for kickers wouldn't you say??? AV plays in the brutal northeast and drills those mothers through the uprights regularly and in clutch situations. I think he should get more than Rackers but 3.3 is ridiculous.

I agree, he should get more than Rackers but if anyone wanted to argue the other way, they would at least have a leg to stand on. Rackers hit 95% of his kicks last season. 3.3 isn't even ridiculous, I don't think there's even a word for what that is. Maybe Bartoniculous?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...