Jump to content

Who has more trade value: Wentz or Darnold


Recommended Posts

Darnold because of age and contract but..

Wentz’s career is very salvageable. One down year isn’t enough for me to write off an otherwise 27TD-7INT career passer. He’s been a lot more successful in this league.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

Darnold because of age and contract but..

Wentz’s career is very salvageable. One down year isn’t enough for me to write off an otherwise 27TD-7INT career passer. He’s been a lot more successful in this league.

this hit from Clowney took 5% off Wentz' completion percentage 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

Darnold because of age and contract but..

Wentz’s career is very salvageable. One down year isn’t enough for me to write off an otherwise 27TD-7INT career passer. He’s been a lot more successful in this league.

The truth is, Wentz has been a much better player than Darnold. Wentz sucks this year, but was a legit MVP candidate a few years ago before his injury

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

Darnold because of age and contract but..

Wentz’s career is very salvageable. One down year isn’t enough for me to write off an otherwise 27TD-7INT career passer. He’s been a lot more successful in this league.

imo wentz needs a sit down moment much like tannehill had with the titans.  he needs to reassess what he wants to be. he's got a ton of talent but probably isn't a very nice person and he's going to be haunted by not winning a superbowl like foles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wentz is more talented but seems like a bit of a headcase and has major injury concerns (not that Darnold doesn't) plus a giant price tag. In a vacuum I'd pick Wentz but with all those other factors it doesn't make sense.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, slimjasi said:

The truth is, Wentz has been a much better player than Darnold. Wentz sucks this year, but was a legit MVP candidate a few years ago before his injury

 

Yes he looked great on a SuperBowl caliber roster. So did Nick Foles.  Amazing what happens when you build a team from the inside out.

  • Post of the Week 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wentz comes with 4 yrs left, $96 million total.   But it's essentially a 2 yr $47 million deal. Darnold comes with 1 year and an option year that you have to make a decision on right after the draft that'll cost at least $25 million.  

The better player by far is obviously Wentz. I don't want Wentz but between the two you'd take Wentz in my opinion. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of the above.

actually depends what you want them for.  Wentz is way to expensive to be a back up. Both are injury prone.  Wentz has shown in the past he can play.  Darnold hasn't.

Like I said, None of the above. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, flgreen said:

None of the above.

actually depends what you want them for.  Wentz is way to expensive to be a back up. Both are injury prone.  Wentz has shown in the past he can play.  Darnold hasn't.

Like I said, None of the above. 

Well considering both are likely to be traded I asked a simple question who has more value. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rhg1084 said:

Well considering both are likely to be traded I asked a simple question who has more value. 

If I were a GM I wouldn't trade for either of them, so to this wan-a-b Gm, neither has any value 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...