Jump to content

***Official NFL Playoff Weekend Game Thread***


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Lith said:

Is it that hard for the league to change the rule.  Fumble out of bound in EZ should return to the team that had possession at spot of fumble.  Nowhere else on the field do you lose a fumble when it goes out of bounds.

Where do you put the ball?   Everywhere else you can spot the ball where it went out.   It’s a crazy rule but fumbling out of bounds through the end zone means you didn’t have possession or it’s a TD and there isn’t a place to spot the ball for the O.  In a crazy way it makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Biggs said:

Where do you put the ball?   Everywhere else you can spot the ball where it went out.   It’s a crazy rule but fumbling out of bounds through the end zone means you didn’t have possession or it’s a TD and there isn’t a place to spot the ball for the O.  In a crazy way it makes sense. 

A fumble out of your own EZ is a safety....the rule kinda stinks but I get it. Fumbling is avoidable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Beerfish said:

I get nam like flashbacks on Austin Sefarian Jenkins when I see that play.

Edit: I get scooped by two other posters before I say this?  Clearly i am not as smart as I thought I was.

I'm not sure if I should take offense to that or not.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you guys noticing in this first half it’s like 

Catch by Hill

Catch by Kelce

Catch by Hill

Catch by Hill

Catch by Kelce 

Catch by Kelce 

Catch by Hill

Cstch by Hill 

Catch by Kelce 

Having Star Offensive players is pretty, pretty, pretty, good! 

  • Post of the Week 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

A fumble out of your own EZ is a safety....the rule kinda stinks but I get it. Fumbling is avoidable.

I don’t mind either rule.  They both make sense.  There’s nowhere to spot the ball.  
 

what was horrible is the league that’s supposed to protect players from head trauma doesn’t allow a head to head shot to be challenged.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jetster said:

Are you guys noticing in this first half it’s like 

Catch by Hill

Catch by Kelce

Catch by Hill

Catch by Hill

Catch by Kelce 

Catch by Kelce 

Catch by Hill

Cstch by Hill 

Catch by Kelce 

Having Star Offensive players is pretty, pretty, pretty, good! 

Hardman is having a good game too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jetster said:

Are you guys noticing in this first half it’s like 

Catch by Hill

Catch by Kelce

Catch by Hill

Catch by Hill

Catch by Kelce 

Catch by Kelce 

Catch by Hill

Cstch by Hill 

Catch by Kelce 

Having Star Offensive players is pretty, pretty, pretty, good! 

 

Just now, Philc1 said:

Hardman is having a good game too

Offensive playmakers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Biggs said:

I don’t mind either rule.  They both make sense.  There’s nowhere to spot the ball.  
 

what was horrible is the league that’s supposed to protect players from head trauma doesn’t allow a head to head shot to be challenged.  

You can’t allow non penalties to be reviewed. Game is tedious enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Biggs said:

Why not.  Coaches get 3 challenges.  It’s costly to give up TO.  Get it right.  

Ah true. I thought you wanted a booth review. Though even under 2 minutes I wouldnt want a tackle to be reviewed by the booth. Too much funny business.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...