Biggs Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Perfect fit for New England. He’s got Vinny Testeverde arm talent with more gas in the tank then when Parcells brought him to the Jets. With there opt outs coming back and adding a dynamic playmaker on O they would contend immediately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 9 hours ago, football guy said: He's gotta be a really happy man right now. Detroit and Carolina could get into a bidding war for #2 assuming Watson remains with Houston Best possible outcome if Watson stays put for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 16 minutes ago, Prodigal Syndicate said: No thanks. Career loser and he is old. 32 brah. Not old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Had Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Wouldn't rule out the fins swapping 3 for 7, Fitz is not goona be brought back...Stafford is a good fit there should Tua have issues. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 12 hours ago, Maxman said: Deshaun's trade value just went WAY DOWN. This is great news. Not really but that would be cool. this is good for us. Miami could get Stafford for there late #1 this year and maybe one or two 2s. i dont think Miami is a serious trade partner for Watson cause i dont think they want to part with the 3rd pick. i think they could keep it in a Stafford trade. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 13 hours ago, Maxman said: Deshaun's trade value just went WAY DOWN. This is great news. Not really but that would be cool. sorry for the repost. page wouldnt post so i kept clicking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 13 hours ago, Maxman said: Deshaun's trade value just went WAY DOWN. This is great news. Not really but that would be cool. delete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 13 hours ago, Maxman said: Deshaun's trade value just went WAY DOWN. This is great news. Not really but that would be cool. delete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 13 hours ago, Maxman said: Deshaun's trade value just went WAY DOWN. This is great news. Not really but that would be cool. delete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 10 hours ago, Bungaman said: Washington Foreskins Which is another team that could be a landing spot for Stafford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 14 hours ago, Adoni Beast said: Another team who could be looking to trade up to #2...or for Sam. Beautiful. Except Stafford will be signed to start somewhere else, taking away a team that "could be looking to trade up to #2". Net effect, zero change to the value of #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 15 minutes ago, Warfish said: Except Stafford will be signed to start somewhere else, taking away a team that "could be looking to trade up to #2". Net effect, zero change to the value of #2. Well it depends. If its a team picking in the 20’s that sign Stafford, then they were never really in the mix to trade up with us. But yea if its Carolina that’s a big blow to our trade down potential. I think Carolina and now Detroit are our best trade down options. After that Denver seems determined to run it back with Lock one more time. Let’s see what happens with Dallas and Dak. San Fran might be a possibility but going from 12 to 2 would take a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 14 hours ago, Spoot-Face said: Anyone who suggests trading for Matt Stafford over Deshaun Watson while "k33pInG MOAR PicKS" gets their dick stomped on. No worries here ? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKnight83 Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 14 hours ago, Rhg1084 said: He’s still only 33, could have another 4 or 5 years of productivity He is also a slightly better Mark Sanchez. Without Megatron he was simply adequate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 13 hours ago, Adoni Beast said: Agreed, just saying that it seems to be. I’d personally draft Wilson at 2 and ship Sam off to the highest bidder. Why does it "seem to be"? Because we all heard the traditional GM/Coach speak about how they love Darnold? IMO, there is no "it seems to be". Everything said publicly is pre free agency coach/GM propaganda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 13 hours ago, Beerfish said: * * I am sure Douglas is not listening to ? us ? on this forum. ..you sure ? ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 3 hours ago, Biggs said: Perfect fit for New England. He’s got Vinny Testeverde arm talent with more gas in the tank then when Parcells brought him to the Jets. With there opt outs coming back and adding a dynamic playmaker on O they would contend immediately. ok,.. so.. has anything Like this ^ ^ ever happened before ? ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Werblin Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 15 hours ago, KRL said: I've been harping on the Jets not to become HOU or DET. Teams with high priced, stat producing QB's but incomplete rosters that don't win. And now in the space of a week both teams are in turmoil, coincidence? I don't think so. Build the roster properly first then make a splash move. Not the other way around Perhaps this is what is meant by “there are no shortcuts”? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Cowbell Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 15 hours ago, Adoni Beast said: Another team who could be looking to trade up to #2...or for Sam. Beautiful. If Sam gets traded to the Lions, he will officially be the poster boy for worst luck in the NFL ever. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Werblin Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 15 hours ago, Spoot-Face said: Anyone who suggests trading for Matt Stafford over Deshaun Watson while "k33pInG MOAR PicKS" gets their dick stomped on. Can I suggest that the Lions need to trade Stafford for more draft capital so they can trade it to the jets to move up from 7 to 2? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Cowbell Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 15 hours ago, dcJet said: If Stafford goes for a 2nd rounder or less, we ain't getting d*ck for Sammy. It's a different market for Stafford. He will go to a team that is built. Miami, Colts, Bears would actually make sense if they want to make a push. Sam is going to be traded to a team that is still building. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DetroitRed Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Pats could be interesting. Exactly where he’s going Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 53 minutes ago, GKnight83 said: He is also a slightly better Mark Sanchez. Without Megatron he was simply adequate. Passing (Stafford) Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% 1D Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD AV Career 165 165 74-90-1 3898 6224 62.6 45109 282 4.5 144 2.3 2255 87 7.2 7.1 11.6 273.4 89.9 385 2496 6.45 6.32 5.8 31 38 130 2009 21 DET QB 9 10 10 2-8-0 201 377 53.3 2267 13 3.4 20 5.3 111 75 6.0 4.3 11.3 226.7 61.0 37.1 24 169 5.23 3.64 6.0 1 1 3 2010 22 DET 9 3 3 1-2-0 57 96 59.4 535 6 6.3 1 1.0 28 36 5.6 6.4 9.4 178.3 91.3 50.1 4 36 4.99 5.74 4.0 1 1 2 2011 23 DET QB 9 16 16 10-6-0 421 663 63.5 5038 41 6.2 16 2.4 243 73 7.6 7.7 12.0 314.9 97.2 60.5 36 257 6.84 6.98 5.2 3 4 16 2012 24 DET QB 9 16 16 4-12-0 435 727 59.8 4967 20 2.8 17 2.3 267 57 6.8 6.3 11.4 310.4 79.8 56.1 29 212 6.29 5.81 3.8 3 3 13 2013 25 DET QB 9 16 16 7-9-0 371 634 58.5 4650 29 4.6 19 3.0 223 87 7.3 6.9 12.5 290.6 84.2 53.5 23 168 6.82 6.40 3.5 2 3 13 2014* 26 DET QB 9 16 16 11-5-0 363 602 60.3 4257 22 3.7 12 2.0 212 73 7.1 6.9 11.7 266.1 85.7 47.3 45 254 6.19 6.03 7.0 5 5 12 2015 27 DET QB 9 16 16 7-9-0 398 592 67.2 4262 32 5.4 13 2.2 224 57 7.2 7.3 10.7 266.4 97.0 58.3 44 251 6.31 6.39 6.9 2 3 13 2016 28 DET QB 9 16 16 9-7-0 388 594 65.3 4327 24 4.0 10 1.7 218 73 7.3 7.3 11.2 270.4 93.3 65.2 37 216 6.52 6.56 5.9 8 8 14 2017 29 DET QB 9 16 16 9-7-0 371 565 65.7 4446 29 5.1 10 1.8 210 71 7.9 8.1 12.0 277.9 99.3 65.2 47 287 6.80 7.01 7.7 1 4 14 2018 30 DET QB 9 16 16 6-10-0 367 555 66.1 3777 21 3.8 11 2.0 197 67 6.8 6.7 10.3 236.1 89.9 51.3 40 255 5.92 5.79 6.7 0 1 10 2019 31 DET QB 9 8 8 3-4-1 187 291 64.3 2499 19 6.5 5 1.7 117 66 8.6 9.1 13.4 312.4 106.0 71.3 18 137 7.64 8.15 5.8 2 1 8 2020 32 DET QB 9 16 16 5-11-0 339 528 64.2 4084 26 4.9 10 1.9 205 73 7.7 7.9 12.0 255.3 96.3 68.5 38 254 6.77 6.89 6.7 3 4 12 Passing (Sanchez) Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% 1D Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD AV Career 79 73 37-36-0 1314 2320 56.6 15357 86 3.7 89 3.8 759 74 6.6 5.6 11.7 194.4 73.2 168 1090 5.73 4.82 6.8 8 10 2009 23 NYJ QB 6 15 15 8-7-0 196 364 53.8 2444 12 3.3 20 5.5 122 65 6.7 4.9 12.5 162.9 63.0 32.8 26 195 5.77 4.07 6.7 6 2010 24 NYJ QB 6 16 16 11-5-0 278 507 54.8 3291 17 3.4 13 2.6 162 74 6.5 6.0 11.8 205.7 75.3 51.3 27 171 5.84 5.38 5.1 3 5 9 2011 25 NYJ QB 6 16 16 8-8-0 308 543 56.7 3474 26 4.8 18 3.3 172 74 6.4 5.9 11.3 217.1 78.2 42.1 39 243 5.55 5.05 6.7 4 4 9 2012 26 NYJ QB 6 15 15 6-9-0 246 453 54.3 2883 13 2.9 18 4.0 146 66 6.4 5.2 11.7 192.2 66.9 27.1 34 209 5.49 4.36 7.0 1 1 5 2014 28 PHI qb 3 9 8 4-4-0 198 309 64.1 2418 14 4.5 11 3.6 119 72 7.8 7.1 12.2 268.7 88.4 57.5 23 151 6.83 6.18 6.9 7 2015 29 PHI 3 4 2 0-2-0 59 91 64.8 616 4 4.4 4 4.4 30 43 6.8 5.7 10.4 154.0 80.7 28.1 9 54 5.62 4.62 9.0 2 2016 30 DAL 3 2 0 10 18 55.6 93 0 0.0 2 11.1 5 33 5.2 0.2 9.3 46.5 30.3 4.2 3 25 3.24 -1.05 14.3 0 2018 32 WAS 6 2 1 0-1-0 19 35 54.3 138 0 0.0 3 8.6 3 20 3.9 0.1 7.3 69.0 28.0 4.5 7 42 2.29 -0.93 16.7 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 15 hours ago, Jetty said: Colts: trade 21st overall and a 3rd rounder for Stafford Lions: trade 21st overall, 7th overall and 2nd rounder for the number 2 overall Jets: trade the 7th overall, 21st overall, 23rd overall and Darnold to the Texans for Watson why wouldn't the jets just trade the 2 pick to the texans for watson? not to rain on the parade but there is also the matter of watson's contract. i'm not 100% sure on this but he's at 40 million of salary cap hit for the 22 and 23 seasons. this may work out for the jets since they really only have maye and qwill to lock up in this time period. mosely will be coming off the books in a couple of seasons. and darnold won't be there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Dcat said: Why does it "seem to be"? Because we all heard the traditional GM/Coach speak about how they love Darnold? IMO, there is no "it seems to be". Everything said publicly is pre free agency coach/GM propaganda. True. We’ll see. I hope just draft Wilson. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 13 hours ago, Untouchable said: The sluts up north will trade for him dear Untou, hi ! ?.. please be advised - i am no longer up north ? p.s. unless of course, u consider northern georgia " up north " ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 4 hours ago, Dunnie said: 32 brah. Not old. agreed ! ? ...some folks.. Like Atlanta ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 50 minutes ago, More Cowbell said: If Sam gets traded to the Lions, he will officially be the poster boy for worst luck in the NFL ever. ..they do have a roof ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Treehorn Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 56 minutes ago, Warfish said: Passing (Stafford) Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% 1D Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD AV Career 165 165 74-90-1 3898 6224 62.6 45109 282 4.5 144 2.3 2255 87 7.2 7.1 11.6 273.4 89.9 385 2496 6.45 6.32 5.8 31 38 130 2009 21 DET QB 9 10 10 2-8-0 201 377 53.3 2267 13 3.4 20 5.3 111 75 6.0 4.3 11.3 226.7 61.0 37.1 24 169 5.23 3.64 6.0 1 1 3 2010 22 DET 9 3 3 1-2-0 57 96 59.4 535 6 6.3 1 1.0 28 36 5.6 6.4 9.4 178.3 91.3 50.1 4 36 4.99 5.74 4.0 1 1 2 2011 23 DET QB 9 16 16 10-6-0 421 663 63.5 5038 41 6.2 16 2.4 243 73 7.6 7.7 12.0 314.9 97.2 60.5 36 257 6.84 6.98 5.2 3 4 16 2012 24 DET QB 9 16 16 4-12-0 435 727 59.8 4967 20 2.8 17 2.3 267 57 6.8 6.3 11.4 310.4 79.8 56.1 29 212 6.29 5.81 3.8 3 3 13 2013 25 DET QB 9 16 16 7-9-0 371 634 58.5 4650 29 4.6 19 3.0 223 87 7.3 6.9 12.5 290.6 84.2 53.5 23 168 6.82 6.40 3.5 2 3 13 2014* 26 DET QB 9 16 16 11-5-0 363 602 60.3 4257 22 3.7 12 2.0 212 73 7.1 6.9 11.7 266.1 85.7 47.3 45 254 6.19 6.03 7.0 5 5 12 2015 27 DET QB 9 16 16 7-9-0 398 592 67.2 4262 32 5.4 13 2.2 224 57 7.2 7.3 10.7 266.4 97.0 58.3 44 251 6.31 6.39 6.9 2 3 13 2016 28 DET QB 9 16 16 9-7-0 388 594 65.3 4327 24 4.0 10 1.7 218 73 7.3 7.3 11.2 270.4 93.3 65.2 37 216 6.52 6.56 5.9 8 8 14 2017 29 DET QB 9 16 16 9-7-0 371 565 65.7 4446 29 5.1 10 1.8 210 71 7.9 8.1 12.0 277.9 99.3 65.2 47 287 6.80 7.01 7.7 1 4 14 2018 30 DET QB 9 16 16 6-10-0 367 555 66.1 3777 21 3.8 11 2.0 197 67 6.8 6.7 10.3 236.1 89.9 51.3 40 255 5.92 5.79 6.7 0 1 10 2019 31 DET QB 9 8 8 3-4-1 187 291 64.3 2499 19 6.5 5 1.7 117 66 8.6 9.1 13.4 312.4 106.0 71.3 18 137 7.64 8.15 5.8 2 1 8 2020 32 DET QB 9 16 16 5-11-0 339 528 64.2 4084 26 4.9 10 1.9 205 73 7.7 7.9 12.0 255.3 96.3 68.5 38 254 6.77 6.89 6.7 3 4 12 Passing (Sanchez) Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% 1D Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD AV Career 79 73 37-36-0 1314 2320 56.6 15357 86 3.7 89 3.8 759 74 6.6 5.6 11.7 194.4 73.2 168 1090 5.73 4.82 6.8 8 10 2009 23 NYJ QB 6 15 15 8-7-0 196 364 53.8 2444 12 3.3 20 5.5 122 65 6.7 4.9 12.5 162.9 63.0 32.8 26 195 5.77 4.07 6.7 6 2010 24 NYJ QB 6 16 16 11-5-0 278 507 54.8 3291 17 3.4 13 2.6 162 74 6.5 6.0 11.8 205.7 75.3 51.3 27 171 5.84 5.38 5.1 3 5 9 2011 25 NYJ QB 6 16 16 8-8-0 308 543 56.7 3474 26 4.8 18 3.3 172 74 6.4 5.9 11.3 217.1 78.2 42.1 39 243 5.55 5.05 6.7 4 4 9 2012 26 NYJ QB 6 15 15 6-9-0 246 453 54.3 2883 13 2.9 18 4.0 146 66 6.4 5.2 11.7 192.2 66.9 27.1 34 209 5.49 4.36 7.0 1 1 5 2014 28 PHI qb 3 9 8 4-4-0 198 309 64.1 2418 14 4.5 11 3.6 119 72 7.8 7.1 12.2 268.7 88.4 57.5 23 151 6.83 6.18 6.9 7 2015 29 PHI 3 4 2 0-2-0 59 91 64.8 616 4 4.4 4 4.4 30 43 6.8 5.7 10.4 154.0 80.7 28.1 9 54 5.62 4.62 9.0 2 2016 30 DAL 3 2 0 10 18 55.6 93 0 0.0 2 11.1 5 33 5.2 0.2 9.3 46.5 30.3 4.2 3 25 3.24 -1.05 14.3 0 2018 32 WAS 6 2 1 0-1-0 19 35 54.3 138 0 0.0 3 8.6 3 20 3.9 0.1 7.3 69.0 28.0 4.5 7 42 2.29 -0.93 16.7 0 Reading that on an iPhone... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantasy Island Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 14 hours ago, ScarletKnight89 said: Pat McAfee has been talking a lot on his podcast about the Colts needing to make a trade for Matt Stafford. I do think the Colts are a good fit. I love the Pat McAfee show on satellite radio. Hilarious. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcJet Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 2 hours ago, GKnight83 said: He is also a slightly better Mark Sanchez. Without Megatron he was simply adequate. This is a bad take. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarletKnight89 Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 4 minutes ago, Fantasy Island said: I love the Pat McAfee show on satellite radio. Hilarious. I keep forgetting he is on Mad Dog's channel on Satellite. I always just watch his show on Youtube. He's great. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munchmemory Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronx Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 16 hours ago, Bleedin Green said: The Colts immediately come to mind if they would want to double down on what they tried to do with Rivers. They also don't seem like the kind of team particularly eager to go all-in on a rookie. Colts sticking to their masterful plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, GKnight83 said: He is also a slightly better Mark Sanchez. Without Megatron he was simply adequate. On what planet is 5000 yds in one season allowed in the same conversation as the Sanchez ????? Not only that .... 8 Season over 4000 something Sanchez never sniffed. Your comment is comical. Edited January 24, 2021 by Dunnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.