Jump to content

If Watson doesn't happen, which do you prefer?


If Watson doesn't happen, which do you prefer?  

178 members have voted

  1. 1. If the Watson trade doesn't happen, which of these do you prefer?

    • Sam Darnold Re-roll
    • Zack Wilson
    • Justin Fields
    • Trey Lance
    • Mac Jones
    • A-veteran-to-be-named-later (specify below)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have no ******* idea tbh, I just wanna have fun watching this team again. 

Delete your accounts.  

lololololol 38 % prefer Darnold. You losers deserve what you get.  

Posted Images

Trey Lance and Darnold re-roll.  See who works out.  Assumes Lance goes 5-10 and we can get good compensation for trading down.

Why?

Given the success of Josh Allen and Dak Prescott, I am not sure that Lance is a biggest stretch than Darnold, Fields or Wilson.

But I am not convinced that Darnold is going to work out either, particularly if he gets more expensive.  

I think it is worth the 2 and the Seattle picks for Watson.  Not more.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted #1 as long as we trade own from #2 and get significant draft resources out of it.

I would not be opposed to trading down, still picking a QB if there is one we like and rolling with darnold to start net year.

If that is not the plan then I change it to taking a QB at #2.  (probably wilson)

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

..watson is NOT happening for us. sam will be the starter ( unless he's injured ). regardless of what i prefer.. that's the way is gonna be   😒

 

 

 

cheers ~ ~ 

:beer:   

  • Upvote 2
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GreenFish said:

I really like Wilson. But I’m at the point where I think the best thing to do is trade back and just push the QB decision off at least another year. Could be QB fatigue though. 

Agreed, could be, as you put it, QB fatigue but at this point I’m in the more of a trade down acquire more picks, build the team and bring in a veteran to compete with Sam (dalton, Winston ). And this coming from someone that doesn’t have much faith in Sam 

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Fields and Wilson. I'd actually prefer Wilson but I chose Fields. I think the concerns about Fields are way overblown. And the injuries with Wilson scare me. Surgeries on both shoulders and his throwing hand is enough to make me think twice.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Post of the Week 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, varjet said:

Trey Lance and Darnold re-roll.  See who works out.  Assumes Lance goes 5-10 and we can get good compensation for trading down.

Why?

Given the success of Josh Allen and Dak Prescott, I am not sure that Lance is a biggest stretch than Darnold, Fields or Wilson.

But I am not convinced that Darnold is going to work out either, particularly if he gets more expensive.  

I think it is worth the 2 and the Seattle picks for Watson.  Not more.  

I'm not going to pretend that I know a SINGLE thing about Lance. If he is a multi-year project, it would make sense to roll with Darnold or a hold-the-fort veteran. We are SO far away from competing that I would rather suffer a few more years while a young team develops in order to finally put a competitive team on the field than "improve" to a perennial middle of the pack team. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Anthony Jet said:

Agreed, could be, as you put it, QB fatigue but at this point I’m in the more of a trade down acquire more picks, build the team and bring in a veteran to compete with Sam (dalton, Winston ). And this coming from someone that doesn’t have much faith in Sam 

Totally agree and I'm putting my name on it. Sam re-roll. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't vote because I don't know either, but I'm in the trade down camp, and getting either Lance or M. Jones later in the 1st.  That all goes away if JD can get a TEAM friendly trade for Watson. No trading QW, or #2 involved, start and end with the 3 picks from Seattle, and Darnold and we got a deal, otherwise I'm ready to roll with Sam, a VET, Morgan, and the drafted rooking competing for the starting spot next year with at least 3-5 more draft picks from trading out of #2.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Plan A) Watson

Plan B) Draft QB you love at #2

Plan C) If you aren't 100% sold on a QB then weigh options of trading #2 overall vs trading Sam - which team appears more desirable after compensation?

Plan D) Stay at #2 take a non QB and roll with Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as I woukd like the team to run again with Sam and draft Smith,, I think the best thing for everyone is trade Sam and start over with Fields. I just can't  see the team really continuing with Darnold. I do not think San Is bad, I think he will be a good QB but at this point, there would just be a lot less baggage to deal with if we draft a QB.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going with Fields but honestly the worse case scenario of keeping Sam and perhaps trading down for a potential stud and more picks would be good too.  Obviously there is a pecking order of what we prefer but I think in any decision we make we will be in a much better situation this season.      

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Would like to see them trade down for a haul keep Sam and pick up Mac Jones somewhere middle to late first round. Build team first as there are way too many needs as of now and after talent is upgraded then a fair determination can be made of Sam and Jones then let them compete for the spot along with Captain Morgan 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would probably go with Wilson at #2 based on the offense that they are bringing in, it resets the rookie contract and gives the team a much needed fresh start. Trade Darnold and recoup a 2nd.

It's not what I think the team will end up doing though, I've resigned myself to a 4th year of Darnold for awhile and trading back in the draft. I can see the allure of a big package for the #2 overall pick but I'm pretty sure this is going to land us in no-man's land next year when Darnold flops again.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...