FidelioJet 9,029 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 18 minutes ago, k-met57 said: this is wrong. the only factor here is the evaluation this FO has of Wilson or Fields. Nothing carries more risk than hitching their horse to a rookie they are not completely in love with just because he is cheap. they will all lose their jobs in 3 years if that falls through. Nah. With Sam he's has this year - thing will get very ugly very fast if Sam doesn't produce. With a rookie he has a three year window to see real production. When all is said and done they are going to make the move for job preservation over anything else. It's human nature. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
k-met57 2,690 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 hour ago, FidelioJet said: Nah. With Sam he's has this year - thing will get very ugly very fast if Sam doesn't produce. With a rookie he has a three year window to see real production. When all is said and done they are going to make the move for job preservation over anything else. It's human nature. good football people dont do the thing that buys them time from being fired, they do the thing that can get them to wins...whatever that is. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FidelioJet 9,029 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, k-met57 said: good football people dont do the thing that buys them time from being fired, they do the thing that can get them to wins...whatever that is. The bottom line is, it's the safer move. You can make an argument either way, keeping Sam or not = but they were always going to come the conclusion to move on from Sam. Because ultimately it's the safest move they can make. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dunnie 2,939 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 The bottom line is, it's the safer move. You can make an argument either way, keeping Sam or not = but they were always going to come the conclusion to move on from Sam. Because ultimately it's the safest move they can make.I still think there is an unlikely scenario where we have Wilson/Lance in camp WITH Darnold. ... just have a feeling ... like not getting over diarrhea. Sent from my SM-G950U1 using JetNation.com mobile app Quote Link to post Share on other sites
k-met57 2,690 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
k-met57 2,690 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 21 minutes ago, FidelioJet said: The bottom line is, it's the safer move. You can make an argument either way, keeping Sam or not = but they were always going to come the conclusion to move on from Sam. Because ultimately it's the safest move they can make. drafting a rookie out of college is hardly a safe move by any measure. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post oatmeal 1,113 Posted February 22 Popular Post Share Posted February 22 9 minutes ago, k-met57 said: drafting a rookie out of college is hardly a safe move by any measure. 10 minutes ago, k-met57 said: Ummm... ^^^^ Am I missing something? Please someone find the stat of Justin or Zach leading the FBS in turnovers? Sam also has the weaker arm out of the 3, worst accuracy and not as fast of a runner. I really don’t get the logic 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
peebag 7,565 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 On 2/20/2021 at 3:09 PM, y2k8 said: Is that an old report or a new report? Who are his sauces? Alfredo and Margherita assured him it was true. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
More Cowbell 4,927 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 On 2/20/2021 at 4:32 PM, oatmeal said: Aka we want to trade Sam and hope to get back more than a pack of skittles. But if they are truly split plz Woody fire that Sam supporting half, we don’t need them pushing us to a colts/bears type team We should only trade Sam if the team is set on going in the direction of a new QB. That most likely means drafting him. I have no doubt the Watson trade thing is all but dead at this point. If Wilson or Fields is the guy that JD wants to hitch his wagon to, then yes, tell the Sam supporters suck it up, we are going with a new guy, but if JD is not convinced that either of those two will be great QB's, then we need to stay with Sam. I am sick of watching this team screw up high draft picks. We can get a great player at two or trade it for multiple picks, possibly two firsts. I much rather go with Sam then take a guy we are not 100% confident in. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Philc1 14,208 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 hours ago, k-met57 said: 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Philc1 14,208 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 hours ago, oatmeal said: Ummm... ^^^^ Am I missing something? Please someone find the stat of Justin or Zach leading the FBS in turnovers? Sam also has the weaker arm out of the 3, worst accuracy and not as fast of a runner. I really don’t get the logic When your entire schedule is facing East Tampon State and the Coast Guard Academy you had better not turn the ball over Quote Link to post Share on other sites
k-met57 2,690 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 4 hours ago, oatmeal said: Ummm... ^^^^ Am I missing something? Please someone find the stat of Justin or Zach leading the FBS in turnovers? Sam also has the weaker arm out of the 3, worst accuracy and not as fast of a runner. I really don’t get the logic Geno Smith had 42 TD's, 6 picks, and completed 71% of his passes in college. That is what you are missing. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pointman 5,250 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 7 hours ago, Ghost said: We’re going to regret getting rid of Sam. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BroadwayRay 3,151 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 6 hours ago, k-met57 said: Really? Darnold throws an accurate deep ball? In what fantasy land is that true? Darnold played a full college season where he had only four turn-over worthy passes in 353 dropbacks? Darnold throws four turnover worthy passes per game. Dan Orlovsky, you are increasingly looking like you are full of sh*t. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
k-met57 2,690 Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 2 hours ago, BroadwayRay said: Really? Darnold throws an accurate deep ball? In what fantasy land is that true? Darnold played a full college season where he had only four turn-over worthy passes in 353 dropbacks? Darnold throws four turnover worthy passes per game. Dan Orlovsky, you are increasingly looking like you are full of sh*t. Only thing you can blame Dan for (Simms does the same) is he is sympathetic to QB’s in sh*t situations...otherwise....I’ll take his word over yours lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.