jetsrule128 375,399 Posted Wednesday at 12:53 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:53 AM Curious to hear Jets fans thoughts on this debate 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
joewilly12 24,373 Posted Wednesday at 12:55 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:55 AM Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Integrity28 73,584 Posted Wednesday at 12:55 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:55 AM Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grandy 3,393 Posted Wednesday at 12:55 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:55 AM 3rd option: F*ck no 2 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ljr 2,816 Posted Wednesday at 01:02 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:02 AM only if I get at least a 6th round pick in the 2022 draft 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post JTJet 5,403 Posted Wednesday at 01:10 AM Popular Post Share Posted Wednesday at 01:10 AM Interesting. The same people advocating to trade Sam because he sucks are most likely the same people that would be afraid to trade him to NE. Why? If he universally sucks, then we should universally want him in NE.. right? That's how that's supposed to work. Derp. 9 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Charlie Brown 9,490 Posted Wednesday at 01:12 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:12 AM The one team that the Jets will NOT trade Sam Darnold to is New England!!!1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post heymangold 1,988 Posted Wednesday at 01:13 AM Popular Post Share Posted Wednesday at 01:13 AM Cam Newton literally won a MVP 5 years ago and was better then Darnold last year - if the pats are going to give pick 15 for Darnold, I’ll take it and run. 7 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
KRL 11,969 Posted Wednesday at 01:16 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:16 AM If NE is willing to pay a "double QB premium" of two #1's (2021 & 2022) I would be willing to listen 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post JiF 150,008 Posted Wednesday at 01:18 AM Popular Post Share Posted Wednesday at 01:18 AM And play him twice a year? Absolutely! 4 1 2 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jet Nut 16,117 Posted Wednesday at 02:14 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:14 AM 1 hour ago, JTJet said: Interesting. The same people advocating to trade Sam because he sucks are most likely the same people that would be afraid to trade him to NE. Why? If he universally sucks, then we should universally want him in NE.. right? That's how that's supposed to work. Derp. Simple. Theyre hedging their bets. If theyre wrong they dont want to make it a million times worse by being wrong in the hands of Belichick and the Pats for the next 10 friggen years. That would be worse than Brady 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jet Nut 16,117 Posted Wednesday at 02:15 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:15 AM 1 hour ago, Charlie Brown said: The one team that the Jets will NOT trade Sam Darnold to is New England!!!1 #endthread 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Crusher 219,625 Posted Wednesday at 02:16 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:16 AM 1 hour ago, jetsrule128 said: Curious to hear Jets fans thoughts on this debate You should stay away from sharp objects, 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
prime21 5,627 Posted Wednesday at 03:56 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 03:56 AM The price for NE would be two #1’s. Wont happen but might as well give them a price. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SayNoToDMC 14,896 Posted Wednesday at 04:14 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 04:14 AM I wouldn't trade him to them for all their picks. Last thing I need as a Jets fan is him to succeed there. I wish him the best anywhere else Quote Link to post Share on other sites
#27TheDominator 211,104 Posted Wednesday at 04:43 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 04:43 AM 2 hours ago, The Crusher said: You should stay away from sharp objects, Disagree. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beerfish 33,443 Posted Wednesday at 04:47 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 04:47 AM Yes I would if they were the highest bidder. If the Jets think Darnold is not good there should be zero fear of dealing him to new england. If they think he is a threat they should not be trading him at all. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spoot-Face 25,321 Posted Wednesday at 04:50 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 04:50 AM F*ck it. If they gave us a 1st round pick, sure, why not? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Maxman 539,285 Posted Wednesday at 05:27 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:27 AM Is there an option that has someone just kicking me in the nuts and I fall on the keyboard which deletes my moderator rights so that threads like this are no longer my problem? I pick that one. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Warfish 29,036 Posted Wednesday at 05:44 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:44 AM No. Not because I fear Sam. But because I don't trade with hated rivals. I'm old school that way. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gibby 1,039 Posted Wednesday at 01:45 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:45 PM 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jetspenguin 2,052 Posted Wednesday at 01:47 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:47 PM Curious to hear Jets fans thoughts on this debate This is a debate?Sent from the Suicide Watch desk. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TeddEY 262,249 Posted Wednesday at 02:13 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:13 PM 13 hours ago, JTJet said: Interesting. The same people advocating to trade Sam because he sucks are most likely the same people that would be afraid to trade him to NE. Why? If he universally sucks, then we should universally want him in NE.. right? That's how that's supposed to work. Derp. Sam is the worst QB in the NFL at it would be AWESOME if we traded him to New England. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Biggs 10,243 Posted Wednesday at 02:22 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:22 PM Not just yes. Hell yes! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Morrissey 13,033 Posted Wednesday at 02:25 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:25 PM Yes. 3 first rounders. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UntouchableCrew 6,074 Posted Wednesday at 05:49 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:49 PM If they offered the most to acquire him? Sure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slimjasi 10,316 Posted Wednesday at 05:51 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:51 PM I would because I genuinely think he's a bad NFL starting QB, but the Jets never would, so there is no use in discussing it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slimjasi 10,316 Posted Wednesday at 05:52 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:52 PM A more interesting question is whether NE would even be interested in trading for Darnold. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Beerfish 33,443 Posted Wednesday at 05:57 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:57 PM 1 minute ago, slimjasi said: A more interesting question is whether NE would even be interested in trading for Darnold. I think that would be the very best match for both Darold and NE, I've said it for a while. NE gets a still cheap young QB worth taking a chance on that would not cost them an arm and a leg to acquire. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flea Flicking Frank 50 Posted Wednesday at 06:02 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:02 PM If BB really wanted to play Jedi mind games with JD, he would absolutely call and offer a trade, interested or not. Its even more of a mind hump if he doesnt want him and is trying to get JD to think there is something worth keeping 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mrcoops 4,708 Posted Wednesday at 06:05 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:05 PM For a Deshaun Watson type price, yes. Anything less, they can go F themselves. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ron Jeremy 8 Posted Wednesday at 06:15 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:15 PM Yes because Darnold is sh*t. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jetsfan80 121,108 Posted Wednesday at 06:15 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:15 PM 1,000x yes. Our gain, their loss. However, given that Darnold has saved some of his worst career performances for NE, I find it hard to believe Belichick would have any interest: 12/30/18: 16-28, 167 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs, 74.6 QB Rating 10/21/19: 11-32, 86 yards, 0 TDs, 4 INTs, 3.6 QB Rating 1/3/21: 23-34, 266 yards, 1 TDs, 2 INTs, 76.3 QB Rating Total: 50-94 (53 %), 519 yards, 5.5 YPA, 1 TD, 6 INTs Quote Link to post Share on other sites
munchmemory 12,412 Posted Wednesday at 06:25 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 06:25 PM Absolutely. Guarantees us two wins next season. 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wonderboy 4,561 Posted Wednesday at 09:20 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:20 PM 20 hours ago, Grandy said: 3rd option: F*ck no 4th option Trade the OP before any further thread privileges. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.