The Count of Monte Cristo Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 minute ago, fltflo said: Donald your tee time is up. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Yes, yes, anti bias for everyone is ugly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fltflo Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 So many seem be to be on Wilson as the better prospect. Theisman even feels he’s better than Lawrence. And there are other prominent former QB’s that believe Wilson is the pick @ #2, regardless if it’s the Jets or who they may trade with. One thing is for sure, as you stated, Sam I Am will be Sam I’m not....a Jet next season. 1st choice - Watson, but no more than 2#1’s unless we can get a #1 for Darnold and throw that in the package. 2nd choice - Trade Darnold, trade back and take either of the three of Wilson, Fields, Lance. 3rd choice - Trade Darnold, trade back, sign a FA QB and get a QB next year if you’re not enamored with the other top 4. I’ll take one from Column three pleaseSent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fltflo Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 Answer this question and do it honestly. If he were black and not rich and white, would anyone DARE call him the names that I hear him being called? Tell the truth now. Yes or no. I'm not the one bringing race into it. It's already there, it's been there and no one says a word about it. Well, I said a word about it. I'm sorry if fairness doesn't appeal to some of you. In retrospect, I shouldn't have expressed that part of the equation and would take it back if I could. Evaluating a player by calling him "creepy looking" was stupid enough and childish enough on it's own. Of course, I still would have been told to get the stuff out of here. Side note: Those people that commend your English are morons and no one should tolerate it. It is true in the reverse as well, however.Oh Max. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderboy Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 14 hours ago, Integrity28 said: I didn’t watch that far, tbh. The kids is a marmot. 14 moms and 1 dad. My guess is this is a completely fake story and he was just going dmfull David Koresh for the cameras. This does not bode well for Wilson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heymangold Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 35 minutes ago, fltflo said: So long as it’s not us doing the picking of either one. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app sorry bro, darnold ain't the guy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Morrissey said: Are you going to show your face around here if you’re totally wrong? No one should be this confident about draft prospects Wrong about what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiF Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 1 hour ago, TheMo said: I know I will be. I literally thought Josh Allen was the worst. No chance to be any good. Dead wrong. But I still think he is an outlier. @JiFand I could be wrong about Wilson, but I think if you applied our logic to a Wilson/Fields debate in 10 iterations it would prevail about 80% of the time. To me the biggest error in the 2017 draft wasn’t trubisky over mahomes it was trubisky over Watson. And that similar break down in logic seems to be going on with Fields/Wilson IMHO. Again not impossible that he does well but lower chance than Fields. Oh wrong that Fields is better then Wilson? Yeah, I'll 100% show face. I admitted that I got that draft wrong too, thought Darnold was the best prospect but I honestly kind of hated them all. I wanted Watson/Mahomes and was more pissed that we didnt take one of them then I was excited about 18. I can remember passionately arguing with people saying we should pass on those 2 for the 18 class. And I've said this many times before, I have no clue if Fields is going to be great at the next level. I dont have the same confidence as I did, say Watson but if I had the choice, there is no way in hell I'd take Wilson over Fields. It's honestly totally baffling to me that anyone would. They both need development, who would you rather coach up? A small framed, injury riddled, mediocre athlete, who has 1 year of production vs. horrible competition and was horrendous the years before all because he has a live arm OR would you take the all world freak athlete, #2 prospect in the country since his freshman year of high school, Ivy league brain, highly productive vs. high level competition, outshined the "generational prospect" on the national stage, tough bad ass alpha male? I mean, it's just weird anyone would go the other way, but whatevs, to each their own. I have no crystal ball but I'll take the freak to develop, thank you very much. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 6 hours ago, The Count of Monte Cristo said: Answer this question and do it honestly. If he were black and not rich and white, would anyone DARE call him the names that I hear him being called? Tell the truth now. Yes or no. I'm not the one bringing race into it. It's already there, it's been there and no one says a word about it. Well, I said a word about it. I'm sorry if fairness doesn't appeal to some of you. In retrospect, I shouldn't have expressed that part of the equation and would take it back if I could. Evaluating a player by calling him "creepy looking" was stupid enough and childish enough on it's own. Of course, I still would have been told to get the stuff out of here. Side note: Those people that commend your English are morons and no one should tolerate it. It is true in the reverse as well, however. So, here is the thing. I am disappointed in you for doing this here again. I actually unbanned your other account about 3 weeks after it was banned. Was willing to give you another shot, had you logged in under that you would have had that shot. I like when an account with 160 posts says that they have debated posters here and won many times. That is always very telling. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 This thread can now continue without the garbage please. I am not deleting any of the old stuff but I ask that you just move past it otherwise we will just have to lock the thread. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 2 hours ago, Maxman said: So, here is the thing. I am disappointed in you for doing this here again. I actually unbanned your other account about 3 weeks after it was banned. Was willing to give you another shot, had you logged in under that you would have had that shot. I like when an account with 160 posts says that they have debated posters here and won many times. That is always very telling. Permo ban I hope this time, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 7, 2021 Share Posted March 7, 2021 2 hours ago, BurnleyJet said: Permo ban I hope this time, I didn't even touch his other account this time. That is on him either way... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 This was a great thread. That Count of Monte Cristo, boyitellya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.