Sonny Werblin Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 If drafted by a team that understands how best to use him, Pitts is a matchup nightmare. Jimmy Graham is a good example. Sean Peyton knew how to use him and in years 2 through 5 in New Orleans Graham averaged over 137 targets and 88 receptions per season. In the 6 seasons since leaving New Orleans, Graham's high for targets and receptions in any season were 96 and 65. I've got no problem picking Pitts, but if he's picked he has to be utilized to his full potential and leaned on heavily. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 2 hours ago, Philc1 said: Is better than Wilson and Fields Impossible to tell without either one ever taking an NFL snap. Yet, even if he is, he was still the worse QB in the NFL last year. So we keep him and let’s say we go 8-8 then what? Do you pay him like a FQB? It’s just a very difficult situation., 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 2 hours ago, Anthony Jet said: He’s not a Quaterback Thread should be ended right here..... It really is that simple. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYJ1 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 There aren't any. Kyle Pitts is an EXCELLENT selection just not at 2. I would trade down a few spots to maybe 5 or 7, 8 and Kyle Pitts becomes an excellent selection with great value 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantasy Island Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 2 hours ago, Philc1 said: The only legitimate reason is Penei Sewell is an equally great OL prospect and we desperately need OL too besides playmakers here's one reason: 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K_O_Brien Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Great QB + Good TE > Good QB + Great TE. And we don't even have that good QB. Pitts, with Darnold would be a complete waste and borderline stupid. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost420 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 2 hours ago, Philc1 said: Sorry but it’s true Name 1 thing Danrold does better than either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embrace the Suck Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 1 hour ago, adobolo2 said: We are not exactly know for picking quality QBs either Sure, but the topic is why not to draft Pitts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAM SAM HE'S OUR MAN Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Jet coaches NEVER know how to correctly use a TE . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adobolo2 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 33 minutes ago, Embrace the Suck said: Sure, but the topic is why not to draft Pitts. Yes but as @JetNuts replied to my comment that if we were to go on the premises that we don't pick players because of our previous bad history with that position we would never pick any players. You pick Pitts because he is a very good player and our history with Tight Ends has noting to do with it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYDreamer Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 2 hours ago, Philc1 said: The only legitimate reason is Penei Sewell is an equally great OL prospect and we desperately need OL too besides playmakers Love the talent...But I think I have to stick with Sewell. Without that OLine no QB is going to have time to throw the ball to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealeb319 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Pitts is my favorite prospect in this draft but we pretty much have 0 chance at him because if we don't take qb we are not staying at pick 2 and he won't be there for us if we move down. The kid has atlanta falcons written all over himSent from my Pixel 2 XL using JetNation.com mobile app 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTL Jet Fan Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Might be a Dolphin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 1 hour ago, playtowinthegame said: I just hope Joe channels his inner Ozzie Newsome and trades back to 4 or 8 which will give the Jets a haul of draft picks they desperately need to improve this team. It's a smart bet for Joe to have more premium draft picks in '21, '22, and '23. I don't want to put all our eggs in the Zach Wilson basket. All of our eggs? We have another first round pick, possibly two 2nd rounders if we trade Darnold & another two 3rd rounders & then in 22’ we have another two 1st round picks. What is this talk like we only have our #2 overall pick and nothing else afterwards to build the team? Some of you just want to trade back because you don’t want Wilson, it has nothing to do with picks, it can’t, that argument doesn’t make sense. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 2 hours ago, neckdemon said: Because if we don't take wilson, which its looking more and more like we will, the better option would be to take sewell or trade down Pretty interesting, Sewels stock seems to be falling. Hes been downgraded to the second OT of this draft by many. Apparently maturity issues and work ethic questions coming into play 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 37 minutes ago, NYDreamer said: Love the talent...But I think I have to stick with Sewell. Without that OLine no QB is going to have time to throw the ball to him. Sewell isn’t even the defacto #1 prospect at his position. Slater is ahead of him on multiple boards. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YankeeJet22 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 1 minute ago, Patriot Killa said: All of our eggs? We have another first round pick, possibly two 2nd rounders if we trade Darnold & another two 3rd rounders & then in 22’ we have another two 1st round picks. What is this talk like we only have our #2 overall pick and nothing else afterwards to build the team? Some of you just want to trade back because you don’t want Wilson, it has nothing to do with picks, it can’t, that argument doesn’t make sense. Yes you're correct in that we have a nice amount of picks. But trading down to add an ADDITIONAL 3 to 4 premium picks in the next couple of years would be an awesome way to build towards sustainable success. For God sakes, build a team. And your QB will be better. Maybe much better. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K_O_Brien Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 8 minutes ago, Jet Nut said: Pretty interesting, Sewels stock seems to be falling. Hes been downgraded to the second OT of this draft by many. Apparently maturity issues and work ethic questions coming into play Wouldn't surprise me. Growing chatter than the Bengals may take Chase to pair up with his LSU buddy at QB. And rely on IOL help in later rounds. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 12 minutes ago, YankeeJet22 said: Yes you're correct in that we have a nice amount of picks. But trading down to add an ADDITIONAL 3 to 4 premium picks in the next couple of years would be an awesome way to build towards sustainable success. For God sakes, build a team. And your QB will be better. Maybe much better. Both are true, sure, that would be awesome, but it’s not a must make move, it’s not worth passing on a QB at 2. You can take the QB at 2 & still build a very good roster with the current resources that the Jets have. I feel like the only situation where I could find it reasonable to pass on a QB at 2 and trade down is if they had very limited picks after 2. If we were in the Texans boat with draft capital, trading down would make more sense to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embrace the Suck Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 1 hour ago, adobolo2 said: Yes but as @JetNuts replied to my comment that if we were to go on the premises that we don't pick players because of our previous bad history with that position we would never pick any players. You pick Pitts because he is a very good player and our history with Tight Ends has noting to do with it. I think sometimes people take comments on message boards a little too seriously. Don't worry I'm not JD. I won't be handing in the card. I'm a huge fan of the TE position, and think if you want him you take him. I just remember the Jets blatantly ugly history with first round TEs and thought to make light of that history. #TEsMATTER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 46 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: Sewell isn’t even the defacto #1 prospect at his position. Slater is ahead of him on multiple boards. Hes falling. After all the hype over a guy who didnt play last season, its odd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 46 minutes ago, YankeeJet22 said: Yes you're correct in that we have a nice amount of picks. But trading down to add an ADDITIONAL 3 to 4 premium picks in the next couple of years would be an awesome way to build towards sustainable success. For God sakes, build a team. And your QB will be better. Maybe much better. At some point you have to stop collecting picks and use them where you need help. Youre not winning in this league without a QB who can get you wins. Sam hasnt been able to do that so you have to get a QB. We're in a great position to get one, we may not be in this position with a QB worth drafting for years. Grab the QB and with as many picks as high JD has accumulated he has enough bullets to bring in talent 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playtowinthegame Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 1 hour ago, Patriot Killa said: All of our eggs? We have another first round pick, possibly two 2nd rounders if we trade Darnold & another two 3rd rounders & then in 22’ we have another two 1st round picks. What is this talk like we only have our #2 overall pick and nothing else afterwards to build the team? Some of you just want to trade back because you don’t want Wilson, it has nothing to do with picks, it can’t, that argument doesn’t make sense. I'm strictly talking about turning that #2 overall pick into multiple premium picks in this draft and the next two drafts. Is Zach Wilson worth all of that? That's what I mean by putting all our eggs into one basket. Take Zach Wilson at No. 2 or trade the pick and turn it into several other premium picks who could be great players? As for you saying I don't want Wilson, you correct. On this Jets team I don't want Zach Wilson. The Jets have too many needs and they are NOT a risky pick on a quarterback, who's from BYU, away from becoming a contender. When I see the 2nd overall pick I see several picks/players I'd rather have down the road instead of a BYU quarterback who came out of nowhere with multiple shoulder injuries playing against subpar competition. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 3 hours ago, whodeawhodat said: TE isnt an impact position. I dont want to draft him at 8 either. Let some other team that is a TE away draft him. Need WR and Oline first i wonder what bellichick thinks of this as it looks like he is gearing up to run 4 TE sets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Frog Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Hahahahaaaaaa you can’t make this up. Well, Phil could. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace Frog Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 1 hour ago, Jet Nut said: Pretty interesting, Sewels stock seems to be falling. Hes been downgraded to the second OT of this draft by many. Apparently maturity issues and work ethic questions coming into play 1 hour ago, Patriot Killa said: Sewell isn’t even the defacto #1 prospect at his position. Slater is ahead of him on multiple boards. It’s funny a month ago Sewell was being talked about as being the best LT prospect in a generation, maybe ever. Now it’s likely he’s not even the best LT in a single draft? People keep using that word “generational”. I do not think that word means what they think it does. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 25 minutes ago, neckdemon said: i wonder what bellichick thinks of this as it looks like he is gearing up to run 4 TE sets The reason Bill turns to TEs is because he doesn’t know how to scout receivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrissey Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 5 hours ago, Philc1 said: Is better than Wilson and Fields So they are worse than the worst starting NFL quarterback last year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrissey Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 5 hours ago, Philc1 said: No good ones are available after Trevor at 1 Idiotic to be this confident in your analysis of college players 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 1 hour ago, Peace Frog said: It’s funny a month ago Sewell was being talked about as being the best LT prospect in a generation, maybe ever. Now it’s likely he’s not even the best LT in a single draft? People keep using that word “generational”. I do not think that word means what they think it does. I always thought that Sewells greatness was helped by not seeing him play for a year. Hes good, real good but he isnt close to being a dominating run blocker and thats usually where college OTs excel. And really, how can they name one generational player for a position after another? I thought it meant best of a generation. Guess not 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS17 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 4 hours ago, Sammybighead said: 1. He’s not a QB 2. Chase is a better WR Even in some fantasy world where we didn’t draft a QB with our first pick, Chase would be the best choice. He dominated the SEC at 19. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Not liking touchdowns? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 Good player, fine prospect, Now name me all the TE's picked really high that were pro bowlers on a regular basis and real difference makers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 5 minutes ago, PS17 said: Even in some fantasy world where we didn’t draft a QB with our first pick, Chase would be the best choice. He dominated the SEC at 19. We have 4 solid receivers now. Chase would take one of them off the field. Adding Pitts would be the biggest upgrade to the offense this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetBlue Posted March 28, 2021 Share Posted March 28, 2021 5 hours ago, Philc1 said: Pitts is going to be a way more valuable player than Adams ditto for wilson and fields No offense but you are really making a fool of yourself. Please stop, you are a better poster than this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.