Jump to content

Bridgewater criticizes Rhule


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Glad we avoided Rhule as coach.  This guy's answer to the qb position is to sign Bridgewater to a 3 year deal and after that blew up in his face, trade a 2nd for Darnold and commit to him for a 5th ye

I’m a pro you know I could throw all of that out there man but that ain’t me. Lol.  Didn’t he just throw it out there in this interview.  People are funny. 

^^^^doesnt know how to shut his moth.

Bridge will be out of work once Aaron Rodgers is traded to Denver.

Same goes for Rhule when Carolina fans figure out that Darnold is lousy.

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Biggs said:

In fairness to Teddy, he did play QB for Mike Zimmer and Sean Payton.   He might know something about good NFL coaching.  

None of those good coaches NFL wanted him starting anymore.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, undertow said:

None of those good coaches NFL wanted him starting anymore.

Without having a horrific injury Teddy is likely still starting in MN.  He’s a very good spot starter and high end backup.  He’s very accurate and he’s probably right about Carolina.  Rhule was a downgrade at HC for them. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Joe W. Namath said:

Glad we avoided Rhule as coach.  This guy's answer to the qb position is to sign Bridgewater to a 3 year deal and after that blew up in his face, trade a 2nd for Darnold and commit to him for a 5th year?

What a dope!

are you sure the head coach is making personnel decisions?

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Darnold didn't have to practice Red Zone or 2 minute either since we were never in position to score or in tight games so they have that in common

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said:

In Rhule's defense, with Teddy at QB there wasn't much chance of getting in the RZ. 

Sure he's 9 TD in 5 starts and 5 wins for NO including a QBR of 99.1 says Rhule is a genius.   Rhule signed him to a long term deal and doubled down on Darnold without any results.   Maybe Rhule isn't a great NFL HC.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Morrissey said:

are you sure the head coach is making personnel decisions?

Matt Rhule has it written in his contract that he has final say on the roster.  Of course he's making the decision on the QB.   That's also one of the reasons he's not the HCNYJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Warfish said:

Bitter cast-off players being bitter, news at 11.

Adams was right about Gase.  He was also bitter.  The two aren't mutually exclusive. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Joe W. Namath said:

Glad we avoided Rhule as coach.  This guy's answer to the qb position is to sign Bridgewater to a 3 year deal and after that blew up in his face, trade a 2nd for Darnold and commit to him for a 5th year?

What a dope!

Well I am sure the GM has a lot of input but not taking Jones or Fields at 8 IMO was just dumb. Yes you have 1 less player for 2020 in the draft but you have insurance against Darnold and even if they did not play Fields or Jones would still fetch a first in a trade a year or 2 down the road.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Biggs said:

Matt Rhule has it written in his contract that he has final say on the roster.  Of course he's making the decision on the QB.   That's also one of the reasons he's not the HCNYJ.

Generally that does not extend to the draft, but I do think he has more power in personnel than most HCs

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, johnnysd said:

Well I am sure the GM has a lot of input but not taking Jones or Fields at 8 IMO was just dumb. Yes you have 1 less player for 2020 in the draft but you have insurance against Darnold and even if they did not play Fields or Jones would still fetch a first in a trade a year or 2 down the road.

Agreed. I actually think it would have been a safer move to take a QB early because it would give him two chances at QB vs the one with Darnold. 

He picked Teddy, that didn't work. 
He traded for Darnold, and if that doesn't work will the Panthers give him a 3rd chance at a QB?  

And if the Panthers go 6-10, they won't really be in position to take a QB at 1/2. And they won't even have a 2nd round pick to use to trade up because they used that pick to get Darnold. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Anthony Jet said:

No body knows how to shut there moth these days.... and I like bridgewater 

The organization pretty publicly dragged him. Not to say this is the most professional way to go but I can understand why he'd have bad feelings toward the Panthers.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, johnnysd said:

Well I am sure the GM has a lot of input but not taking Jones or Fields at 8 IMO was just dumb. Yes you have 1 less player for 2020 in the draft but you have insurance against Darnold and even if they did not play Fields or Jones would still fetch a first in a trade a year or 2 down the road.

Unless they were like the Jets and thought the only 2 QB's in this draft that were better than Sam were TL and Wilson.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...