Jump to content

OT- momentum rapidly growing for expansion of CFB playoffs to 8 or more..


Recommended Posts

Finally a chance for a non-P5 to join the playoff party.  This was a long overdue endgame.  Boise State, Western Michigan and UCF never got their chance but someone like them might. 

Would they likely get crushed against the likes of Alabama or Clemson?  Likely, yes.  Do they still deserve a chance to crash the P5 party?  Also yes.  

It would be nice if there was a mechanism where the highest-rated Group of 5 team gets a bid, but I doubt that will be the case.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Momentum rapidly growing for College Football Playoff expansion to eight or more teams

Expansion will likely be agreed upon soon, but it will not be put in place for a couple years

By Dennis Dodd

College Football Playoff expansion discussions are moving faster than anyone initially thought. Doubling the CFP field to eight teams is all but assumed at this point, but expansion may not stop there, multiple industry sources tell CBS Sports. 

"Expansion is coming, and it may be as soon as this summer. It might even be more than [eight teams]," an FBS athletic director, who recently spoke with their league's commissioner, told CBS Sports.

Yahoo Sports reported Tuesday that a 12-team model is favored by multiple parties. CFP executive director Bill Hancock's bold assertion the bracket could expand to as many as 16 teams -- found in the 17th paragraph of an otherwise sleepy April press release -- ignited increased speculation.

"The SEC is going to push 12 because of their brand. I'm hearing 12," a Group of Five AD told CBS Sports.

A 12-team field would presumably allow for six automatic bids -- Power Five conference champions and the top-ranked Group of Five team -- along with six at-large bids.

While the SEC might not be overtly driving the discussion for 12 teams, such a structure would likely benefit the game's most powerful conference. In an eight-team bracket, the SEC would all but be guaranteed two spots annually. In a 12-team bracket, that number could be three or four teams given the current strength of the league and how well it performs in the CFP Rankings.

"The SEC wants more at-larges," one AD located in the South said. 

Outgoing Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott told the New York Timeson Monday that he expects a decision "in principle" by the commissioners next week when they meet June 17-18 in Chicago. Incoming Pac-12 commissioner George Kliavkoff came out in support expansion in what was a prominent part of his introductory press conference.

 

Talks have progressed since April. A working group made up of Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby, Mountain West commissioner Craig Thompson, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and Notre Dame AD Jack Swarbrick -- chairman of the group -- will update their peers next week. The presidents who oversee the CFP will meet on June 22 in Dallas. 

It's not clear yet when a detailed expansion announcement could come. The commissioners could recommend one or multiple models to the presidents next week.

Thoughts seem to be coalescing around a final decision on the future look of the CFP coming by September at the latest. A meeting between the CFP Management Committee (commissioners) and CFP Board of Managers (presidents) has already been scheduled for that month.

Driving the discussion now are several factors. Obviously, there is the money. Two industry sources said, depending on the size of the field, an expanded playoff could be worth two or perhaps even three times more than the current $7.2 billion that ESPN is paying the CFP. The average annual payout of the current deal is $475 million. However, typical of media rights deals the payout is backloaded to increase in the final years. 


A significant part of the discussion is less about access and more about enhancing the value of the regular season. A sort-of playoff fatigue has formed around the recent stranglehold Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State and Oklahoma have put on the game.

"We could go to 24 , and you might still have Alabama and Clemson playing for the championship," said one person with intimate knowledge of the process. 

Concern was expressed that ESPN's "Who's In?" advertising campaign for the CFP has drained interest from the second half of the college football season. That source wasn't the only one who thought the playoff-or-bust mentality had impacted interest. A growing number of ADs and coaches have been critical.

There has been enough thought on the subject that one Power Five source speculated about the impact of a 24-team field.

"You'd have half of FBS that would still be alive in November for those slots," the source said. "We're not going to 24, but theoretically, that's what I think we can accomplish with this."

College football has long lacked the Cinderella factor. An expanded bracket would at least make it more possible for a Group of Five program to have an automatic berth. Such a team playing for the national championship simply hasn't happened in the 23-year history of the BCS and CFP. While technically no team gets an automatic berth now with four at-large bids, an undefeated Power Five program is going to be given far more consideration than an undefeated Group of Five. 

In the CFP, the highest-ranked Group of Five conference champion is guaranteed only a New Year's Six bowl. It must make it into the top four to be in the playoff. Cincinnati (2020) and UCF (2018) were the highest-ranked Group of Five teams in the CFP era. Both finished No. 8.  

Last month, before playoff discussions had become more focused, several sources told CBS Sports that Group of Five access was going to be a tipping point.

"There will be a lawsuit if they don't [give the Group of Five an automatic berth]," one Group of Five AD said.

"To me that's a non-starter," said MAC commissioner Jon Steinbrecher. "If [a guaranteed spot is] not there, why are we doing it? We've set up a rather anti-competitive system."

Since 2013, the FCS has put 24 teams in its NCAA-sponsored playoff. That represents almost one-fifth of the FCS membership. In FBS, only four of 130 (3%) get in the CFP.

In the end, the presidents will have to be convinced that an expanded field can preserve whatever level of integrity they attach to the process. Remember, this was a group that, in the BCS days, drew a line in the sand: no more second-semester football. Then in 2019, major college football played its longest season ever lasting 143 days. 

Approving expansion of the bracket and the timing of actually changing the playoff field are two different things. ESPN and the CFP still have five years left on the original 12-year contract. When there were three years left on the contract, Hancock said no expansion would happen for at least two years. 

ESPN's motivation to do a new deal inside the contract would be cost certainty. That would keep the CFP from hitting the open market. Unless and until that contract runs out, ESPN has exclusive negotiating rights.

As far the bowls are concerned, tearing up that deal and installing a new one could be "pretty disruptive," according to source. It's not that it couldn't be done, but the New Year's Six bowls all have contracts aligned based on the current CFP. For example, the Rose Bowl gets its traditional best-available Big Ten and Pac-12 teams in years when it doesn't host the semifinal. In expansion, the quality of those teams could be diminished.

Those selections might be moved down a peg if one or both conferences have two teams in an expanded playoff. After the 2016 season, Ohio State played in the CFP despite not winning its division in the Big Ten. That left Big Ten champion Penn State playing in the Rose Bowl against the Pac-12's USC, which had finished second behind Colorado in the Pac-12 North. 

The Rose Bowl had to be convinced to give up its exclusivity to its two traditional conferences to join the BCS in 1998. Eight times since, at least one non-traditional team has played in the "Granddaddy of 'em All" due to BCS and CFP commitments.

In an eight-team field, speculation has centered around five automatic qualifiers from the Power Five, something that wasn't possible with only four slots in the current CFP. One source said there might be no automatic berths in an expanded field; however, weight would likely be given to conference champions. 

That would prevent the equivalent of an NCAA Tournament "bid stealer." Example: If Northwestern at 8-4 would had beaten Ohio State in the 2018 Big Ten Championship Game, the Wildcats could have earned an automatic berth in an expanded bracket that otherwise would have gone to a higher ranked at-large team from another conference.  

Guaranteeing the Group of Five a spot in an eight-team field presents problems as that would potentially lead to six guaranteed spots. There is concern that deserving at-large teams could be left out. In 2020, the six automatic qualifiers would have been No. 1 Alabama (SEC), No. 2 Clemson (ACC), No. 3 Ohio State (Big Ten), No. 6 Oklahoma (Big 12), No. 8 Cincinnati (Group of Five) and No. 25 Oregon (Pac-12).

In that scenario, at least four top 10 teams would be left out in an eight-team field. Only two at-large spots would be left. That is another reason why a 12-team bracket may is preferred. 

With an expanded bracket, the playoff would likely start in mid-December. In some years, that would be within a week or so of conference championship games. 

If the regular season started in the last week of August, another weekend could be created to ensure a 12-game season could be played while retaining those league championship games. That so-called "Week Zero" in late August is now reserved for a soft opening of the season by a handful of teams. 

 

 

 

 
 
  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jet Nut said:

 

A 12-team field would presumably allow for six automatic bids -- Power Five conference champions and the top-ranked Group of Five team -- along with six at-large bids.

 

Yes, this.  Perfect.  Do it, NCAA.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, OilfieldJet said:

Not a surprise, just like Watergate, follow the money.

Remember when so many fought against the playoff because of "bowl tradition" and other stupid reasons?  Then the money started flowing in and everything changed.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, PS17 said:

Eight is the perfect number. Go beyond that and the regular season is very diluted.

I like the idea of the top teams getting rewarded with a bye.  12 makes sense to me.  As would 10 (with the bottom 4 playing in).  

It's awfully hard to dilute a regular season that is only 11-12 games long and has 130 FBS programs.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 teams would be great.  There would be no logical argument that the 13th team was somehow the best in the country.  It's never made sense to me how an undefeated team (or more than one) didn't get a shot regardless of the conference they come from.  This would likely solve that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes a world of sense. But for crissakes have the championship on a Friday night rather than a Monday after a week of NFl playoff games. If the big games sucks like this year's did, people are going to sleep rather than watching the 4th quarter. The NFL has no issue getting huge ratings for a Super Bowl at 630 on a Sunday and everyone watches until the end. Put the big game on Friday at 9PM, everyone is partying and not turning it off.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Twelve seemed like too many to me but after seeing how they're going to do it I think it makes sense.

I'm a little sad to essentially see the end of bowl games (or at least, the end of non-major bowl games that will comprise the playoff) but that always seemed like a by-product of a playoff.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/8/2021 at 8:46 PM, Jetsfan80 said:

Finally a chance for a non-P5 to join the playoff party.  This was a long overdue endgame.  Boise State, Western Michigan and UCF never got their chance but someone like them might. 

Would they likely get crushed against the likes of Alabama or Clemson?  Likely, yes.  Do they still deserve a chance to crash the P5 party?  Also yes.  

It would be nice if there was a mechanism where the highest-rated Group of 5 team gets a bid, but I doubt that will be the case.

Interestingly based on the current proposal there would have been two group of five champions that made it in 2020 -- Cincinnati and Coastal Carolina. It takes the top six conference champs regardless of conference.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, UntouchableCrew said:

Twelve seemed like too many to me but after seeing how they're going to do it I think it makes sense.

I'm a little sad to essentially see the end of bowl games (or at least, the end of non-major bowl games that will comprise the playoff) but that always seemed like a by-product of a playoff.

Bowl games basically disappeared (figuratively, not literally) once they went to the playoff.  Nobody cares anymore.  Players skip the bowl games, coaches use them as scrimmages for freshman/sophs.  At least an expanded playoff will mean more meaningul college games in December -- should be great to watch. 

And selfishly, it will open up a spot for teams like the Dawgs who are perenially top 8, but can't seem to get by one dominant team in the conference.  It gives us another shot.  Although with our luck, we will win the SEC first year of the expanded playoff and then lose to a Bama team that only got in due the the larger field.  Would be very Dawgsy.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Lith said:

Bowl games basically disappeared (figuratively, not literally) once they went to the playoff.  Nobody cares anymore.  Players skip the bowl games, coaches use them as scrimmages for freshman/sophs.  At least an expanded playoff will mean more meaningul college games in December -- should be great to watch. 

And selfishly, it will open up a spot for teams like the Dawgs who are perenially top 8, but can't seem to get by one dominant team in the conference.  It gives us another shot.  Although with our luck, we will win the SEC first year of the expanded playoff and then lose to a Bama team that only got in due the the larger field.  Would be very Dawgsy.

Yeah, the teams that will benefit the most from this are the 2nd tier (non Alabama) teams in the SEC (UGA, Florida, LSU, TA&M), the Pac 12 and group of five teams. Maybe even the 2nd tier of the Big Ten, teams like Penn State, Michigan, and Wisconsin who can't by tOSU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Format?

I think a bye for the top 4 rated teams, 8 teams play and then the remaining 8 go at it.  Is that the idea?

Then you probably would not get Bama playing Appalachian state

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said:

Wonder how that's going to work schedule-wise. If it's twelve teams wouldn't that bleed into the start of Spring semester for some of the schools? That's brutal for the players. 

I would imagine some of the very first "bowl games" will be the 1st round, ahead of even some of the sh*ttiest regular bowls.  

Funny how the NCAA used the scheduling problem as a reason not to go to a playoff, but now somehow that isn't even a consideration.  All about those sweet, sweet dollars.

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Beerfish said:

Format?

I think a bye for the top 4 rated teams, 8 teams play and then the remaining 8 go at it.  Is that the idea?

Then you probably would not get Bama playing Appalachian state

Well, you might get Bama playing a team like App St, just not until the 2nd round.  App would have to pull off a 1st round upset against the 5 seed to pull that off, in your scenario.

I would imagine it would be like the NFL where you "re-seed" going into round 2.  1-seed would play the lowest seeded team of the 4 first round winners, while the 4-seed would play the highest remaining seed.  Something like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Lith said:

Bowl games basically disappeared (figuratively, not literally) once they went to the playoff.  Nobody cares anymore.  Players skip the bowl games, coaches use them as scrimmages for freshman/sophs.  At least an expanded playoff will mean more meaningul college games in December -- should be great to watch. 

And selfishly, it will open up a spot for teams like the Dawgs who are perenially top 8, but can't seem to get by one dominant team in the conference.  It gives us another shot.  Although with our luck, we will win the SEC first year of the expanded playoff and then lose to a Bama team that only got in due the the larger field.  Would be very Dawgsy.

 

Exactly.  The other bowls are like the football equivalent of the NIT these days.  They're only big for teams who rarely go to bowl games.  So you might as well expand the tournament.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think 8 is too much. Either way byes for the top 2 teams is a must.

6 teams with the top 2 getting byes is perfect imo. If a group of 5 team can't make it to the top 6, then they dont deserve a spot imo.

Im way less concerned about the bowl games losing luster as opposed to regular season games losing luster. Thats what makes cfb great and unique, its a sport judged on the season, not the playoffs.

Go watch Sprite Ball if you want to care about the playoffs and not care about the regular season, just my two cents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an Alabama fan, thanks to Joe Willie, I'm thrilled with this development. Anytime they are in the tournament it's theirs to lose!! 6 National Championships in 12 years, it doesn't get better than that!! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said:

 

Exactly.  The other bowls are like the football equivalent of the NIT these days.  They're only big for teams who rarely go to bowl games.  So you might as well expand the tournament.   

Yup.  A few years ago I happened to be in Florida for New Year's.  Georgia was playing Michigan State in the Outback Bowl and I decided to go.  We lost what should have been heartbreaking 2 or 3 OT thriller.  Kicker missed a chip shot in either 2nd or 3rd OT.  I should have been crushed.  Would have been nice to win, but it really didn't matter.  It was like watching the Jets lose a preseason game.  Nice to get a W if you can, but once its over, you don't really care.  This will give college football fans more meaningful games to watch in December.  I like it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can have the bowls rotate through sponsoring the playoff games. If anything, it could be more of a cash cow. Can charge a hell of a lot more for a game people will watch vs. a game only partisans Or Alums will watch. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...