Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Say what you want- he’s better than the rotating carousel of trash at qb we have had to watch.

 

He could be another Vinny Testaverde for us.  A guy with talent who was considered a bust early in his career although he made the playoffs, comes here and has a rebirth

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sellis92 said:

Say what you want- he’s better than the rotating carousel of trash at qb we have had to watch.

 

He could be another Vinny Testaverde for us.  A guy with talent who was considered a bust early in his career although he made the playoffs, comes here and has a rebirth

Trubisky last year in 9 starts had 16 TD's and 8 INT's and went 6 and 3 with a team that was 2 and 5 with Nick Foles.  He would be the best QB we have had since Vinny and it's not close.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mitch was basically in the Sam Darnold category after his time in Chicago that's why they drafted Fields. He was probably rated worse than Sam that's why he's backup in Buff with little chance to play except if an injury. He looked good in preseason so opinions on him have changed but he had the opportunity (like Sam did) and many starts and just didn't play well when he had the chance. Look he might have improved but I don't buy into giving up resources for him and besides Buff won't trade him to the Jets. If we make a deal I'd go for someone like Foles. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Biggs said:

Trubisky last year in 9 starts had 16 TD's and 8 INT's and went 6 and 3 with a team that was 2 and 5 with Nick Foles.  He would be the best QB we have had since Vinny and it's not close.  

Bears fans ran this poor guy out of town.  Now that they are watching Justin Fields stink up the joint they must be like “what were we thinking?”

  • Post of the Week 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rangers9 said:

Mitch was basically in the Sam Darnold category after his time in Chicago that's why they drafted Fields. He was probably rated worse than Sam that's why he's backup in Buff with little chance to play except if an injury. He looked good in preseason so opinions on him have changed but he had the opportunity (like Sam did) and many starts and just didn't play well when he had the chance. Look he might have improved but I don't buy into giving up resources for him and besides Buff won't trade him to the Jets. If we make a deal I'd go for someone like Foles. 

He was miles better than Darnold.  It's not even debatable. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Post of the Week 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Biggs said:

He was miles better than Darnold.  It's not even debatable. 

I stay with Zach he's only had 6 games and at times looked very good. Hopefully he can come back sometime this season. Staying on the bench out of fire for a few weeks could appreciably help him. He probably should not have started from game 1 anyways. I always thought if he played he should be on a limited playbook like Mark was his first two years and that worked out. 

  • Post of the Week 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sellis92 said:

Name the ranked defenses in college Zack played well against

Named the top 3 supermarket chains Kurt Warner bagged groceries at.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Sellis92 said:

Say what you want- he’s better than the rotating carousel of trash at qb we have had to watch.

 

He could be another Vinny Testaverde for us.  A guy with talent who was considered a bust early in his career although he made the playoffs, comes here and has a rebirth

I was thinking about bringing in Sanchez under the same premise. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sellis92 said:

He signed a one year deal and will be UFA next offseason 

Oh, so you mean sign him for next season.

Probably more a topic for the offseason then.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Warfish said:

Um, isn't Trubs the backup in Buffalo.

How exactly do we sign someone else's #2 QB?

Think he means make a trade before the deadline.  Don't think it's likely.  But maybe if he can be coaxed before his second afternoon nap, JD can put in a call to Buffalo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Warfish said:

Oh, so you mean sign him for next season.

Probably more a topic for the offseason then.

It’s the Woody era.  We start discussing next year’s offseason before Halloween 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, munchmemory said:

Think he means make a trade before the deadline.  Don't think it's likely.  But maybe if he can be coaxed before his second afternoon nap, JD can put in a call to Buffalo.

Na, see above, he means the next offseason.

Buffalo isn't trading him mid-season, he's their backup now.  They're a contender for a Super Bowl.  They're not taking that risk.

The price, if they were that stupid, would be massive.  Be assured.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Biggs said:

Trubisky last year in 9 starts had 16 TD's and 8 INT's and went 6 and 3 with a team that was 2 and 5 with Nick Foles.  He would be the best QB we have had since Vinny and it's not close.  

Before his arm fell off, that Favre guy was pretty good...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...