Poll: If Woody moved the Jets to London would you still remain a Jet fan?

[TuscanyTile2]

13 minutes ago, rangerous said:

it depends.  would they still be broadcast on "free" tv?

 

 

[slats]

4 hours ago, T0mShane said:

The Jets could play their games in my front yard and I still wouldn’t be a Jets fan. 

As if you have a yard. 

[Beerfish]

8 minutes ago, slats said:

As if you have a yard. 

[Obrien2Toon]

The Nets moved 30 minutes away and I stopped rooting for them 

[UntouchableCrew]

The Jets aren't leaving NY.

Multi-billion dollar franchises don't leave primer markets.

But no, I don't think so. If they abandoned the Jets name then obviously not.

[Dcat]

5 hours ago, T0mShane said:

The Jets could play their games in my front yard and I still wouldn’t be a Jets fan. 

 

45 minutes ago, slats said:

As if you have a yard. 

 

37 minutes ago, Beerfish said:

probably looks more like this

[JohnnyLV]

5 hours ago, JetsFanatic said:

Not if Carton is correct. He said they have to leave the name and history here along with a new expansion team that inherits the name, Jets. So basically he is saying the Jets aren’t leaving, Woody is. 
 

it’s also nonsense. Lol

If they kept the Jets name and were in London I would follow them. If the name changed and there was an expansion team with the Jets name I would follow the "new Jets"

[Rangers9]

I wouldn’t expect it since Woody was wildly unpopular during his time as Ambassador there. 

[southparkcpa]

7 hours ago, BigRy56 said:

Absolutely not. It’s bad enough they play in New Jersey 

When the Browns went to Baltimore, no fans stayed on that I know of.   I hope same here.  **** Woody. 

[JustEndTheSuffering]

I don't understand those of you saying you'd stick with the team as long as they kept the name. **** that, them playing across the Hudson River is bad enough but London? Forget it, my Jets fandom would be over, and I would have to wait for another NY team to replace them hopefully with a new stadium IN NEW YORK like the name says.

[Xtina]

8 hours ago, The Gun Of Bavaria said:

 

How awesome would it be to have a "New Jets" that's just as bad as the "Old Jets". 

Same new Jets? 

[oatmeal]

7 hours ago, IndianaJet said:

I haven't listened to Carton or whoever it was, but my initial thought is that unless the NFL offers Woody some ridiculous compensation package, it would be one of the dumbest business decisions he could make.

But then again, it's Woody, sooooo........

Collective bargaining agreement, the money is still the same if they moved to Mars 

[oatmeal]

3 hours ago, UntouchableCrew said:

The Jets aren't leaving NY.

Multi-billion dollar franchises don't leave primer markets.

But no, I don't think so. If they abandoned the Jets name then obviously not.

All the owners share profits

[Bosleyjet74]

Where has all this jets moving to London coming from. Miami have signed up to 3 different markets so they moving three times. It won’t be happening all they have signed up to is grow the fan base in uk. Not that they need too as being a uk based fan we have one of the top fanbases as it is over here. 
as it is the jets are one of the most profitable sides in the nfl no way they would leave all that to become a uk based side which would go bust in few years

[NYJ37/12]

Why are we doing this?

[oatmeal]

5 minutes ago, Bosleyjet74 said:

Where has all this jets moving to London coming from. Miami have signed up to 3 different markets so they moving three times. It won’t be happening all they have signed up to is grow the fan base in uk. Not that they need too as being a uk based fan we have one of the top fanbases as it is over here. 
as it is the jets are one of the most profitable sides in the nfl no way they would leave all that to become a uk based side which would go bust in few years

Well if we are going with what craig proposed the Jets wouldn’t really be moving, just woody, this terrible team and staff.
 

I mean I personally can’t dismiss this because our owner was just over there for 4 years and the NfL already said they will have international teams sometime in the near future…

As we all know these big money deals are already made and handed behind the scenes, years in advance 

 

Hopefully if this is true and Carton is correct, the NFL does this during a season where there is a special QB available in the draft 

[UntouchableCrew]

19 minutes ago, oatmeal said:

All the owners share profits

So?

It's still an asset that appreciates.

Woody bought the Jets for 635 million in 2000.

Forbes estimates them as being worth 3.55 billion in 2021... And they'd probably sell for more.

And I'll tell you, the Jets aren't the 17th most valuable franchise in the world because they're well run. It's because they're based in New York.

[Vader]

Dem bums

[jeremy2020]

Invalid question. The NFL would never *move* a team to London. If London gets a team in the next 10-15 years, it will be a new expansion franchise. 

CHange it to "If the Jets move.."

[NIGHT STALKER]

Hell no!  I could enjoy the remaining years of my life, save money, save TV sets...you all know the drill.

[New York Mick]

8 hours ago, slimjasi said:

Lol the jets aren’t leaving New York 

 

 

[New York Mick]

Yea, I’m already 1200 miles away from the stadium so what’s another 3000 miles. 

[Anthony Jet]

No. I root for the NY Jets

[slimjasi]

19 minutes ago, New York Mick said:

 

[Grandy]

Heck no.

I'd just settle on rooting for the team that I like the most in terms of look, so the Colts.

[CSNY]

They have a better shot at finding Jimmy Hoffa than me still root for that team

NOT A CHANCE IN HELL 

[HessStation]

OMG no ???????

[Mogglez]

Absolutely not.

[Warfish]

I'd prefer they move to Edinburgh.

[jamesr]

Same new Jets? 

One team would be the Same Old New Jets, the other would be the Same New Old Jets.

I'm just not sure which way round it would be.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

[32EBoozer]

16 hours ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

 

 

What a pleasant man….. just the type to snap and take out the entire BBC building in one fell swoop. 

[32EBoozer]

12 hours ago, UntouchableCrew said:

And I'll tell you, the Jets aren't the 17th most valuable franchise in the world because they're well run. It's because they're based in New York.

I believe London would increase the team’s value. I believe retail/housing costs per sq/foot is higher than NY. Exchange rate favors BP

[UntouchableCrew]

1 hour ago, 32EBoozer said:

I believe London would increase the team’s value. I believe retail/housing costs per sq/foot is higher than NY. Exchange rate favors BP

No chance.

[Waka Flocka Flacco]

10 hours ago, Warfish said:

I'd prefer they move to Edinburgh.

If the skirt fits.

[68JET11]

Voted = I'm out.

If they are required to keep our name, the Parcell's uni's and helmet, I might consider staying if that team is owned by someone who is not named Woody Johnson.