Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTJet Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 6 minutes ago, Tranquilo said: Where did you find your stats? I'm looking at playprofiler and he's at 2 for 2020 and for 2019 here. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DaviCo03.htm Look under advanced receiving and rushing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
football guy Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 14 minutes ago, Guilhermezmc said: the jets do love their injury prone players I'm not crazy about this either. As good as he is, he's missed so many games over the past 4 seasons. I haven't gotten word from a team source yet, but reading the tea leaves this is why they want Scherff: Joe Douglas loves the player. He's been hoping to get this opportunity for 3 offseasons now. Scherff is a great fit for the offense and a difference-maker when on the field. The desire to add more edgy/nasty guys up front is real, and Scherff provides that. They are comfortable with their scheme/depth they are building in the event any of their OL get hurt. Puts less pressure on the team to draft an OL with #4 or #10, but still can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Just now, football guy said: I'm not crazy about this either. As good as he is, he's missed so many games over the past 4 seasons. I haven't gotten word from a team source yet, but reading the tea leaves this is why they want Scherff: Joe Douglas loves the player. He's been hoping to get this opportunity for 3 offseasons now. Scherff is a great fit for the offense and a difference-maker when on the field. The desire to add more edgy/nasty guys up front is real, and Scherff provides that. They are comfortable with their scheme/depth they are building in the event any of their OL get hurt. Puts less pressure on the team to draft an OL with #4 or #10, but still can. All of that makes a ton of sense to me. I’m all for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenFish Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 T minus 16 minutes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy2020 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 23 minutes ago, Tranquilo said: Davis had 3 drops in 2019 and 1 drop in 2020 I'm curious as to your source. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/receiving_advanced.htm says 4 in 2019 and 3 in 2020. Not that I consider drops to be a worthwhile stat on it's own. Too subjective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Just now, GreenFish said: T minus 16 minutes. Calm before the storm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 5 minutes ago, JTJet said: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DaviCo03.htm Look under advanced receiving and rushing. I see. The numbers seem to vary in different places. His drop percentage is lower on here than what @oatmeal cited. Either way, I wouldn't worry about drops. Kupp and Hill had 7 and 8 drops according to the pro-football reference numbers, and in his last year with the Titans, Davis had a lower drop percentage than both of them the past few years. Keenan Allen has 8 here and 11 on NBCSports. It's whatever, especially when his career catch % isn't bad. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post sourceworx Posted March 14, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted March 14, 2022 LOL I'm totally not getting any work done today. 2 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, football guy said: I'm not crazy about this either. As good as he is, he's missed so many games over the past 4 seasons. I haven't gotten word from a team source yet, but reading the tea leaves this is why they want Scherff: Joe Douglas loves the player. He's been hoping to get this opportunity for 3 offseasons now. Scherff is a great fit for the offense and a difference-maker when on the field. The desire to add more edgy/nasty guys up front is real, and Scherff provides that. They are comfortable with their scheme/depth they are building in the event any of their OL get hurt. Puts less pressure on the team to draft an OL with #4 or #10, but still can. You think they can sign Scherff and still go OL at 4? Is that a we're trading Becton scenario? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 2 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said: I'm curious as to your source. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/receiving_advanced.htm says 4 in 2019 and 3 in 2020. Not that I consider drops to be a worthwhile stat on it's own. Too subjective. NBCSports, Sports Info Solutions, playerprofile all have different numbers. Anyway, I don't think they're an issue. If he had an atrocious career catch percentage, maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post sourceworx Posted March 14, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 MVS seems like a super odd target to me. Very low catch rate, no broken tackles, high depth of target. He seems like what we thought Mims could add to this team, but they didn't seem to want it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBeardedSavage Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, football guy said: I'm not crazy about this either. As good as he is, he's missed so many games over the past 4 seasons. I haven't gotten word from a team source yet, but reading the tea leaves this is why they want Scherff: Joe Douglas loves the player. He's been hoping to get this opportunity for 3 offseasons now. Scherff is a great fit for the offense and a difference-maker when on the field. The desire to add more edgy/nasty guys up front is real, and Scherff provides that. They are comfortable with their scheme/depth they are building in the event any of their OL get hurt. Puts less pressure on the team to draft an OL with #4 or #10, but still can. It's wild to me, considering this team's very recent history, that our two biggest 'targets' in free agency are a high priced safety and an injury prone guard? Both of these guys seemingly in line to make, what, 12+ mil a season? Without being sarcastic, I'm genuinely trying to understand the logic here, and I truly don't see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Beerfish Posted March 14, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted March 14, 2022 HA HA HA HA! Washington is so stupid! They took Bradnon Scherf, a friggin guard ha ha ha ha ha and Leo Willimas fell into our laps! BEST player in the draft baby! 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Just now, RedBeardedSavage said: It's wild to me, considering this team's very recent history, that our two biggest 'targets' in free agency are a high priced safety and an injury prone guard? Both of these guys seemingly in line to make, what, 12+ mil a season? Without being sarcastic, I'm genuinely trying to understand the logic here, and I truly don't see it. Great fit for the offense and vet presence and nasty. I'm not saying I agree with it, but I see the logic. I would probably go after James Daniels instead, but I can't say I know more about the offense and fit than they do. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcoops Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 minute ago, #27TheDominator said: MVS seems like a super odd target to me. Very low catch rate, no broken tackles, high depth of target. He seems like what we thought Mims could add to this team, but they didn't seem to want it. I'm seriously hoping that one is bull. He would be a bizarre addition. We have much younger, much cheaper options to drop passes for us. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Just now, Beerfish said: HA HA HA HA! Washington is so stupid! They took Bradnon Scherf, a friggin guard ha ha ha ha ha and Leo Willimas fell into our laps! BEST player in the draft baby! I remember this so vividly. I was pissed. Knew we missed out. Scherff was the guy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, Tranquilo said: I see. The numbers seem to vary in different places. His drop percentage is lower on here than what @oatmeal cited. Either way, I wouldn't worry about drops. Kupp and Hill had 7 and 8 drops according to the pro-football reference numbers, and in his last year with the Titans, Davis had a lower drop percentage than both of them the past few years. Keenan Allen has 8 here and 11 on NBCSports. It's whatever, especially when his career catch % isn't bad. Those dudes mentioned make plays, are true ones and Davis drops key drive killing passes, you tried it though. ? imagine comparing Corey Davis to Keenan Allen, Kup and Hill. Proven wrong once again, this is the heights of Jets fandom 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcoops Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Jetlife33 said: Wow. Rosenhaus is so good at what he does. Having him represent Berrios is a little scary, because you know he's going to get maximum dollars from someone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Just now, oatmeal said: Those dudes mentioned make plays, are true ones and Davis drops key drive killing passes, you tried it though. ? imagine comparing Corey Davis to Keenan Allen, Kup and Hill. Proven wrong once again, this is the heights of Jets fandom My point was that even the best players drop passes. And last year was Corey Davis's worst season yet. He will bounce back. Not everything is a definitive statement about fandom. Leave your NYPost posts elsewhere. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted March 14, 2022 Author Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
football guy Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said: You think they can sign Scherff and still go OL at 4? Is that a we're trading Becton scenario? I doubt it would happen, but can't rule anything out. More likely they would make Becton, Fant, and rookie compete for LT/RT, and would welcome the depth at tackle. What appears more likely today: sign Scherff, then draft versatile T/G/C prospects on day 2-3 that they can groom and develop into future starters. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.