Bowles Movement Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 9 minutes ago, TokyoJetsFan said: you clearly didn't read the article I read every word. Im exaggerating to make a point, but the point is that there are more first rd WRs that succeed than second and third round receivers. Because some from the later rounds arent Denzel Mims doesnt mean that you are more likely to get a Chase in round 3 than in the top 10 picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 We should trade mister white for a conditional 2023 6th load up for next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tfine Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 Trade one of our first round picks for Metcalf Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyJersey Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 3 hours ago, johnnysd said: It means nothing. Literally. And in the literal word of the word literally. Past results have nothing whatsoever to do with what the results will be from this draft. The draft is just odds. The likelihood of being a bust increases with every additional pick in the draft. There will be busts in the first and HOFers in the 7th. It's just odds. Just because 2nd rounders seem to have a similar hit rate to 1st rounders in the past does not apply to this group. It might, but avoiding a 1st rounder because there were a lot of succesfull 2nd rounders before is flat idiotic. Nothing you said makes the Jets drafting a WR in the first round less stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 4 hours ago, Jet Nut said: Who care either way. No one other than Pro Football Reference uses their numbers to rank/rate QBs. Give me a break Wirth basic respect for that mistake. Seriously? I'm saying as bunched up Lawrence, Wilson and Fields were it means nothing. I know you live and die by the printed word, I dont. I watch and think. Fields was worse than Wilson, much worse One more time, who gives a F*ck if its PFR or PFF? QBR isnt QB rating, one has been around forever and other was invented by ESPN a few years ago. You need to heed your own advice. Again, I dont give a F what the numbers are, I watch all the games, you read all the numbers and have one hell of a shltty history of picking QBs. You can live by stats, pick your QBs and draft picks over PFR or PFF or whoever. You are one nasty poster when someone disagrees with you. Dont resend if you dont want to waste youre time. Should have expected that same tired old response from you, ever tie someone doesnt agree with you thats where you wind up I tried. Be well Nut. I wish you the very best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.