Would trading up from 35 for a WR complete the PERFECT first round for the Jets?

[The Buffalo Jet Fan]

 

[Jet_Engine1]

Sure. Why not.

[bla bla bla]

100% this is what I expect us to do. Value is jumping in front of the Chiefs and Packers at the end of the 1st for a 5 year rookie WR

[Waka Flocka Flacco]

Moving up from 35 for a receiver makes enough sense because they were planning to fill the rotation with 4, 10, and turning 35/38/69 into  Tyreek Hill. I don't know how likely it is that Gardner would be one of the other two with all the corners returning plus Reed when they have unreplaced snaps from Crowder, Cole, and Fatukasi and are counting on Carl Lawson and Becton to return from injury to replace Shaq Lawson and Moses.

[BurnleyJet]

Corner, Edge, WR. 

Sauce is Elite, plenty of Edges to pick at 10 then Trade back in for Olave, Burks, London, whoever is left come back end of the 1st.

[TuscanyTile2]

Not to me.  4 picks in the top 38 and we still have to trade up?!  I want JD to use all 4 picks (or trade down and get more picks). 

[bla bla bla]

5 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Not to me.  4 picks in the top 38 and we still have to trade up?!  I want JD to use all 4 picks (or trade down and get more picks). 

You are saving +$15m in cap by trading up and getting the 5th year option.

[Gastineau Lives]

I'd be ecstatic with edge, sauce and Burks

[GangGreen Machine]

I don’t want the WR scraps at #35. We’ve been through this in 2020. 
 

Jets should go get their guy, most likely Burks or Watson around the 20th selection. 

if not consider the Jets only WR options at #35 as guys like Skyy Moore, David bell, or Alec pierce.

London, Williams, Wilson, Olave, Watson, Dotson, and Burks will most likely be goners. 

[Beerfish]

Trade down from 4 or 10 then trade back up into the bottom on the 1st round.

[DoomProphet]

If picks 4 & 10 were Sauce & JJ then absolutely!

[artemusclyde]

Just take a wr at 10, good shot no one grabs a wr before 10, so we'd have first pick anyway and then if a guy like Burks falls to us at 35 we can also double up and grab him.

[Adoni Beast]

If we can leave with:

at 4:

• Thibs or Ekwonu or Sauce

at 10:

• Johnson or Penning or Sauce

then trade back up into the 1st for

• Olave or London 

I’d say that would be an amazing draft.
 

[HighPitch]

Hell no! Those 2 early 2s are valuable and almost 1s. 
 

rather have 4 players than 3. 
 

just snag wilson at 4, jj at 10 and then a watson/mcbride/winfrey at 35 and then a mafe/ pickens/ linderbaum at 38.

why would anyone want to give up 2 of those second round names for burks? Or olave? Thats just silly

[Butterfield]

3 minutes ago, HighPitch said:

Hell no! Those 2 early 2s are valuable and almost 1s. 
 

rather have 4 players than 3. 
 

just snag wilson at 4, jj at 10 and then a watson/mcbride/winfrey at 35 and then a mafe/ pickens/ linderbaum at 38.

why would anyone want to give up 2 of those second round names for burks? Or olave? Thats just silly

Based on the trade value chart, the 35 and 69 would get you the 21st or 22nd pick.  You can move up, and still have 4 picks in the top 38.  

[GangGreen Machine]

32 minutes ago, Butterfield said:

Based on the trade value chart, the 35 and 69 would get you the 21st or 22nd pick.  You can move up, and still have 4 picks in the top 38.  

There will be run on 5 or 6 WR going in the 20-34 range. I’d like to have my pick of those guys with this exact trade scenario. 

[BurntDice]

I’m starting to like the opposite approach. 
 

if hutch and thibs are gone then…

Sauce at 4 Wr at 10 then trade back into the first for edge or just take one at 35. Tons of guys available in that range 

[Dcat]

1 hour ago, Butterfield said:

Based on the trade value chart, the 35 and 69 would get you the 21st or 22nd pick.  You can move up, and still have 4 picks in the top 38.  

Jameson Williams would look very good in a NY Jet uniform.

[TuscanyTile2]

4 hours ago, bla bla bla said:

You are saving +$15m in cap by trading up and getting the 5th year option.

This team needs good players more than it needs cap space.  I'll be upset if we trade up when we have 4 of the 1st 38 picks.

[bla bla bla]

1 hour ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

This team needs good players more than it needs cap space.  I'll be upset if we trade up when we have 4 of the 1st 38 picks.

Well ideally its because you covet a WR and fear he doesnt make it to 35. You'd still have 4 in the top 38 after a trade except you get the guy you want rather than risk losing him.

[Adoni Beast]

10 hours ago, artemusclyde said:

Just take a wr at 10, good shot no one grabs a wr before 10, so we'd have first pick anyway and then if a guy like Burks falls to us at 35 we can also double up and grab him.

Unless Thibs is at 4 or we’re sold on Walker I think we should take Garrett Wilson at 4 and JJII at 10