Jump to content

Would trading up from 35 for a WR complete the PERFECT first round for the Jets?


Recommended Posts

Moving up from 35 for a receiver makes enough sense because they were planning to fill the rotation with 4, 10, and turning 35/38/69 into  Tyreek Hill. I don't know how likely it is that Gardner would be one of the other two with all the corners returning plus Reed when they have unreplaced snaps from Crowder, Cole, and Fatukasi and are counting on Carl Lawson and Becton to return from injury to replace Shaq Lawson and Moses.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Not to me.  4 picks in the top 38 and we still have to trade up?!  I want JD to use all 4 picks (or trade down and get more picks). 

You are saving +$15m in cap by trading up and getting the 5th year option.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t want the WR scraps at #35. We’ve been through this in 2020. 
 

Jets should go get their guy, most likely Burks or Watson around the 20th selection. 


if not consider the Jets only WR options at #35 as guys like Skyy Moore, David bell, or Alec pierce.

London, Williams, Wilson, Olave, Watson, Dotson, and Burks will most likely be goners. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell no! Those 2 early 2s are valuable and almost 1s. 
 

rather have 4 players than 3. 
 

just snag wilson at 4, jj at 10 and then a watson/mcbride/winfrey at 35 and then a mafe/ pickens/ linderbaum at 38.

why would anyone want to give up 2 of those second round names for burks? Or olave? Thats just silly

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HighPitch said:

Hell no! Those 2 early 2s are valuable and almost 1s. 
 

rather have 4 players than 3. 
 

just snag wilson at 4, jj at 10 and then a watson/mcbride/winfrey at 35 and then a mafe/ pickens/ linderbaum at 38.

why would anyone want to give up 2 of those second round names for burks? Or olave? Thats just silly

Based on the trade value chart, the 35 and 69 would get you the 21st or 22nd pick.  You can move up, and still have 4 picks in the top 38.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Butterfield said:

Based on the trade value chart, the 35 and 69 would get you the 21st or 22nd pick.  You can move up, and still have 4 picks in the top 38.  

There will be run on 5 or 6 WR going in the 20-34 range. I’d like to have my pick of those guys with this exact trade scenario. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Butterfield said:

Based on the trade value chart, the 35 and 69 would get you the 21st or 22nd pick.  You can move up, and still have 4 picks in the top 38.  

Jameson Williams would look very good in a NY Jet uniform.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bla bla bla said:

You are saving +$15m in cap by trading up and getting the 5th year option.

This team needs good players more than it needs cap space.  I'll be upset if we trade up when we have 4 of the 1st 38 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

This team needs good players more than it needs cap space.  I'll be upset if we trade up when we have 4 of the 1st 38 picks.

Well ideally its because you covet a WR and fear he doesnt make it to 35. You'd still have 4 in the top 38 after a trade except you get the guy you want rather than risk losing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, artemusclyde said:

Just take a wr at 10, good shot no one grabs a wr before 10, so we'd have first pick anyway and then if a guy like Burks falls to us at 35 we can also double up and grab him.

Unless Thibs is at 4 or we’re sold on Walker I think we should take Garrett Wilson at 4 and JJII at 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...