Jump to content

The Jets are GOOD, and Zach Wilson sucks.


Lupz27

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Irish Jet said:

Football Outsiders had an interesting take:

I get what they're saying but it feels like they're gonna knock Wilson regardless of what he does at this point.

I do think we need to be realistic and realise that if the best we get from Wilson are games like today, even if it's legitimate progress, we should still bring in legit competition for 2023 - Either he becomes what we want and wins the job or we give the team the best chance. 

This team around the QB is all kinds of legit. Next year we have to make the leap to expecting success and you can't coddle and hide a QB when doing that.

Honestly even if he does better than this they need to improve the rest of the QB room. The rest of the roster is loaded. Wilson’s missed games both years. Add a developmental backup somewhere in the draft, see if you get lucky there, and a competent veteran. Can’t have too much good QB play.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

This team hasn't won a Super Bowl in 50+ years.  If we want to win one then there are going to be games where our starting QB has to not just play solid/mistake-free football, but also be a difference maker.  That's the part we haven't seen from Zach yet. 

And I'm not saying he doesn't have the ability to get there.  In fact, I do think he has it in him.  But one of these weeks we need to see it.  And I know this wasn't the week we needed that from him so you can hold off on those responses.  I get it.  But there will be a day.

Btw, I realize most people on here are not mature enough to hear that point after a terrific win like we just experienced.  But it's really not a controversial thing to say at all when you think about it. 

Pittsburgh didn’t count?  He made quite a few “do or die” throws in the tightest of windows on 3rd and 4th downs, in the money quarter, the 4th quarter.  Jets are #1 in the NFL in 4th quarter scoring.  Wilson doesn’t get all the accolades for that, just a fact showing that Joe Douglas is building a very dangerous team.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sonny Werblin said:

I’m sorry Zach Wilson has not fulfilled your eminently reasonable standard of having an mvp season during the course of his first 1.5 seasons of pro ball to avoid criticism of a performance that was everything except bad.

Not even 1.5 seasons, which is now in the neighborhood of 25 games.  I think yesterday was his 19th game.  Also, and the haters won’t care about this, he Missed ALL preseason this year.  Not unfair to suggest that he needed a little time to get his legs under him playing this season.

He pretty much just Started his 2nd season around now.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JoeWillieWhiteShoesHOF said:

Pittsburgh didn’t count?  He made quite a few “do or die” throws in the tightest of windows on 3rd and 4th downs, in the money quarter, the 4th quarter.  Jets are #1 in the NFL in 4th quarter scoring.  Wilson doesn’t get all the accolades for that, just a fact showing that Joe Douglas is building a very dangerous team.

He played really well in that 4Q in Pittsburgh.  It certainly counts.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

He played very well yesterday.  But just because we won a huge game yesterday doesn't mean we don't need more from him.  On the game winning drive he threw 1 pass (IIRC), albeit an important one.  The defense and the running game were the stars yesterday.  Right now it looks like the only thing that separates the Jets from being a real contender is whether or not Zach can take the next step.  And he has the ability to get there.

I will just accept that their are those, including you, whose evaluative curve for Wilson will always bend away from objectivity.

i fail to see how he could’ve done more than was asked of him, and the O lineman praised Zach for getting the Jets into good running plays. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said:

Weird thread after he just played what I thought was probably the best game of his career against one of the best defenses in the league. He was for the most part on time and on target, and took off running a couple of times where it was appropriate. He did have a couple of off target passes but not nearly as much as usual and he wasn't bailing on clean pockets and doing laps in the backfield. He threw the ball away when necessary and took the sack when necessary. 

All in all he looked like an NFL QB yesterday in a big boy divisional game and was part of the reason the team won.

Sums it up nicely for me.

accurate assessment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sonny Werblin said:

I will just accept that their are those, including you, whose evaluative curve for Wilson will always bend away from objectivity.

i fail to see how he could’ve done more than was asked of him, and the O lineman praised Zach for getting the Jets into good running plays. 

You've completely missed the point again.  He played fine yesterday.  There is still a bigger picture to consider.   The defense and running game (including the OL) were the most responsible for the win.  In the game winning drive, it was almost all runs.  Zach hasn't had his signature game yet.  If we have bigger plans then we're going to need more from him.  And that ISN'T a criticism of how he played yesterday.

  • More Ugh 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

You've completely missed the point again.  He played fine yesterday.  There is still a bigger picture to consider.   The defense and running game (including the OL) were the most responsible for the win.  In the game winning drive, it was almost all runs.  Zach hasn't had his signature game yet.  If we have bigger plans then we're going to need more from him.  And that ISN'T a criticism of how he played yesterday.

Your assessment of He played “fine” speaks volumes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

You've completely missed the point again.  He played fine yesterday.  There is still a bigger picture to consider.   The defense and running game (including the OL) were the most responsible for the win.  In the game winning drive, it was almost all runs.  Zach hasn't had his signature game yet.  If we have bigger plans then we're going to need more from him.  And that ISN'T a criticism of how he played yesterday.

Why because you don’t believe a QB can win a game for a team unless he throws for some arbitrary # of yards?  
Meanwhile the OP and those who wanted Fields claim he’s played much better QB with around 65 less yardage per game.  
He outplayed the leagues best QB and won the game but he didn’t actually win the game?    

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JoeWillieWhiteShoesHOF said:

Which PROVES he can do it.  It doesn’t prove he can do that consistently but time will tell, he just started his 2nd season.

Everyone take a step back and give him a chance.

I know he has a lot of potential.  What matters is if he realizes it.  It feels like this team has a chance to legitimately contend.  ZW needs to be at the forefront at some point if that's going to happen though.  Again, not a knock on his game yesterday.  I'm just saying that he hasn't "arrived" yet.  And we need him to.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JoeWillieWhiteShoesHOF said:

Which PROVES he can do it.  It doesn’t prove he can do that consistently but time will tell, he just started his 2nd season.

Everyone take a step back and give him a chance.

That's what I have a problem with, people not acting like he DID play really well. Zach improved in every aspect of his game from last week under immense pressure from his performance against the Pats. Media and fans killed him. He responded against the top D in the league. It's amazing to me how many fans completely disregard the level of competition and how poised and decisive he was the whole game. Not sure how many of you on the board have been in high level competition and have experienced losing a bad match/game and having to come back and be mentally tough and win the next one. It's not easy. He passed the mental strength test with flying colors and outplayed whom many believe is the MVP of the league.

  • Upvote 2
  • Post of the Week 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sonny Werblin said:

Your assessment of He played “fine” speaks volumes.

10 minutes ago, Jet Nut said:

Why because you don’t believe a QB can win a game for a team unless he throws for some arbitrary # of yards?  
Meanwhile the OP and those who wanted Fields claim he’s played much better QB with around 65 less yardage per game.  
He outplayed the leagues best QB and won the game but he didn’t actually win the game?    

Guys, don't get bogged down here.  Great win yesterday.  ZW took a step.  He needs to take more steps though.  The team around him looks like it might be great.  Probably the biggest question mark is STILL if Zach can take the leap.  And that is NOT a knock on the way he played yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Lupz27 said:

Both can be true.

It was true with the 09/10 Jets and Sanchez.  You green googled homers will eventually see.

Pretty much spot on.

But he had some good throws at times yesterday. That click 3rd down strike to Mims made me dick a little hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Guys, don't get bogged down here.  Great win yesterday.  ZW took a step.  He needs to take more steps though.  The team around him looks like it might be great.  Probably the biggest question mark is STILL if Zach can take the leap.  And that is NOT a knock on the way he played yesterday.

What puzzles me is that you couch your posts with the continual assertion that Zach needs to get better. So, that means he’s not where you think he should be after about 17 pro starts and missing this year’s preseason?

Is that correct? If so, enlighten me with where you think he should be development-wise at the current moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sonny Werblin said:

What puzzles me is that you couch your posts with the continual assertion that Zach needs to get better. So, that means he’s not where you think he should be after about 17 pro starts and missing this year’s preseason?

Is that correct? If so, enlighten me with where you think he should be development-wise at the current moment.

A week ago just about everyone on this forum thought that way.  Then he played a solid game yesterday and suddenly it's sacrilege to say he still needs to get better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

You've completely missed the point again.  He played fine yesterday.  There is still a bigger picture to consider.   The defense and running game (including the OL) were the most responsible for the win.  In the game winning drive, it was almost all runs.  Zach hasn't had his signature game yet.  If we have bigger plans then we're going to need more from him.  And that ISN'T a criticism of how he played yesterday.

There is no point to miss.  You have no clue what you're talking about.  The Jets dominated TOP in the second half.  Buffalo didn't have a lot of possessions in the second half.  4 maybe.  One of the reasons was Zach lead a 12 play drive to open the 3rd quarter.  A drive dominated by his passing and running the football on a scramble.  A drive that killed more than half the 3rd quarter.  The Bills D was reeling until a long delay caused by a camera failure gave their D a big time blow.  Miller gets a 10 plus minute blow having nothing to do with the actual game.  The only reason the strip sack happens.  In spite of that the drive limited Buffalo's offensive opportunities and was a key factor in winning the game.  

What happened after the strip sack?  The D got an INT right after it.  A well rested Jets D against a Buffalo O that was sitting on their bench forever.  What happened after we got the ball back.  GW run, followed by a Zach Wilson run and a Zach Wilson TD pass.  

Sorry your point is absurd.  That was a team win that included excellent QB play.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Biggs said:

There is no point to miss.  You have no clue what you're talking about.  The Jets dominated TOP in the second half.  Buffalo didn't have a lot of possessions in the second half.  4 maybe.  One of the reasons was Zach lead a 12 play drive to open the 3rd quarter.  A drive dominated by his passing and running the football on a scramble.  A drive that killed more than half the 3rd quarter.  The Bills D was reeling until a long delay caused by a camera failure gave their D a big time blow.  Miller gets a 10 plus minute blow having nothing to do with the actual game.  The only reason the strip sack happens.  In spite of that the drive limited Buffalo's offensive opportunities and was a key factor in winning the game.  

What happened after the strip sack?  The D got an INT right after it.  A well rested Jets D against a Buffalo O that was sitting on their bench forever.  What happened after we got the ball back.  GW run, followed by a Zach Wilson run and a Zach Wilson TD pass.  

Sorry your point is absurd.  That was a team win that included excellent QB play.

Where do you rank Zach right now?  Is he "elite"?  Is he "excellent"?

To me, he's a young QB that is growing but still hasn't even hit his stride yet.  On most of his good weeks we hear people say that "he didn't have good stats but he didn't need them this week".   Prior to yesterday's game, the majority of the forum was very down on Zach.  He plays 1 solid game and suddenly you're not allowed to say he still needs to get better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry McCockinner said:

Weird thread after he just played what I thought was probably the best game of his career against one of the best defenses in the league. He was for the most part on time and on target, and took off running a couple of times where it was appropriate. He did have a couple of off target passes but not nearly as much as usual and he wasn't bailing on clean pockets and doing laps in the backfield. He threw the ball away when necessary and took the sack when necessary. 

All in all he looked like an NFL QB yesterday in a big boy divisional game and was part of the reason the team won.

I think the jet coaches really got into him in practice last week, after such a horrible game with horrible mechanics and decision making. They been coddling him too much until that point. It is good to see he responded very well from the all around criticism, being called out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Where do you rank Zach right now?  Is he "elite"?  Is he "excellent"?

To me, he's a young QB that is growing but still hasn't even hit his stride yet.  On most of his good weeks we hear people say that "he didn't have good stats but he didn't need them this week".   Prior to yesterday's game, the majority of the forum was very down on Zach.  He plays 1 solid game and suddenly you're not allowed to say he still needs to get better?

Who's saying you can't say what you want?  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Where do you rank Zach right now?  Is he "elite"?  Is he "excellent"?

To me, he's a young QB that is growing but still hasn't even hit his stride yet.  On most of his good weeks we hear people say that "he didn't have good stats but he didn't need them this week".   Prior to yesterday's game, the majority of the forum was very down on Zach.  He plays 1 solid game and suddenly you're not allowed to say he still needs to get better?

So a work in progress? That is my crazy analysis.

I get the need for site histrionics, but this is the same message board that brought us:

-Fire Joe Douglas

-Fire Jeff Ulbrich

-Fire Robert Saleh

Sometimes it is smartest to just say "let's see what we got here". But what fun is that, right?

  • Upvote 1
  • Sympathy 1
  • Post of the Week 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

You've completely missed the point again.  He played fine yesterday.  There is still a bigger picture to consider.   The defense and running game (including the OL) were the most responsible for the win.  In the game winning drive, it was almost all runs.  Zach hasn't had his signature game yet.  If we have bigger plans then we're going to need more from him.  And that ISN'T a criticism of how he played yesterday.

What the F is your point then? 

The Jets are 6-3, ZW is 5-1 as a starter, and we just won THE biggest game of the year before the bye as Zach unquestionably bounced back from last week's debacle.  

There is no bigger picture. The only picture is going to Gillette for payback in two weeks. That's it. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

A week ago just about everyone on this forum thought that way.  Then he played a solid game yesterday and suddenly it's sacrilege to say he still needs to get better?

You avoided the question. Where should he be right now in his development to be "on schedule: in your opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sonny Werblin said:

You avoided the question. Where should he be right now in his development to be "on schedule: in your opinion?

He should be putting up 350 yard, 4 td performances against three of the best five defenses in football, in games where his defense is keeping the other team from scoring, obviously, you know, like all the good quarterbacks do.

  • Upvote 2
  • Sympathy 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Lupz27 said:

Both can be true.

It was true with the 09/10 Jets and Sanchez.  You green googled homers will eventually see.

Which is why it sthe smart thing to do to build the team and then add qb to it on the cheap, cause it don't work out the other way unless you have the best of the best qbs and even then not really.

 

Look hall going down was big but Zach sucking is bigger. He is like a less worse Sanchez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, T0mShane said:

Wild that this is the most trafficked thread on this site since the game thread petered out. Jets fans raaaaage against negativity, but they love them some misery-threads. ?

I think it reflects the general “doom-scrolling” world we live in. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...