Jump to content

Would You Be Willing to Write-Off ‘25-‘27 Season for a ‘23-‘24 SB Ring with Aaron?

32EBoozer

By 32EBoozer
in NY Jets Forum

 Share

Do You Do The Deal With the devil?  

168 members have voted

  1. 1. 54 Years Long Enough & Want to See Before I Die!

    • Yes. Whatever the Cost
      141
    • No. I Want Sustainable Success. Even if We Need to Wait
      28

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Untouchable
Untouchable

I’ve been waiting for “sustained success” for half a century. That sh*t is for the birds It’s not in the cards for this team to land some kind of 22 year old phenom at QB. Go get Rodger

BurntDice
BurntDice

We haven’t made the playoffs in 12 years and people are saying no to winning the sb next year then 3 bad years after? Give me a sb win any day. We can suck for 10 years after and I’d still say yes 

Mogglez
Mogglez

I want to witness a single team of mine win a championship before I die.  If you could guarantee me a Jets ring within the next two years, but it would have to be followed by a Browns-level decade, I

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
Untouchable

Untouchable

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

I’ve been waiting for “sustained success” for half a century.

That sh*t is for the birds

It’s not in the cards for this team to land some kind of 22 year old phenom at QB.

Go get Rodgers and shoot your shot before I’m in the dirt.

  • Upvote 7
  • Post of the Week 4
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lurker89

Lurker89

Posted
Posted

Silly hypothetical realistically there is no guarantee we get a SB ... if inheriting this contract truly means we have to write off two or three years in the future I'd rather **** a cheese grater.

If the contract can be reworked into something not insane I'm down.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
neckdemon

neckdemon

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
8 minutes ago, Lurker89 said:

Silly hypothetical realistically there is no guarantee we get a SB ... if inheriting this contract truly means we have to write off two or three years in the future I'd rather **** a cheese grater.

If the contract can be reworked into something not insane I'm down.

lol but the point of the question is IF it were a definite to win the superbowl would you be ok with it if the next 2 years were total rebuilds basically. you must be a blast at parties.....you probably tell the girl in your wet dreams "you know we really shouldn't do this without a condom"

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
BurntDice

BurntDice

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

We haven’t made the playoffs in 12 years and people are saying no to winning the sb next year then 3 bad years after? Give me a sb win any day. We can suck for 10 years after and I’d still say yes 

  • Upvote 7
  • Post of the Week 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Mogglez

Mogglez

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

I want to witness a single team of mine win a championship before I die.  If you could guarantee me a Jets ring within the next two years, but it would have to be followed by a Browns-level decade, I would agree to that in a New York minute.

  • Upvote 7
  • Post of the Week 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Untouchable

Untouchable

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mogglez said:

I want to witness a single team of mine win a championship before I die.  If you could guarantee me a Jets ring within the next two years, but it would have to be followed by a Browns-level decade, I would agree to that in a New York minute.

Seriously 

Hell, we’re currently in the midst of a Browns-level decade.

This is one of the sh*ttiest, laughable organizations in the history of pro sports. Yet many in this fanbase act like anything short of a 70’s Steelers, 80’s 49ers or 2000’s Pats dynastic run simply isn’t good enough lol.

I started following this team in ‘74 when Namath was literally on his last legs. I’ve been through the brunt of the lowest of the lows.

Just give me a single championship and I’ll be content. Anything more is just gravy.

  • Sympathy 1
  • Post of the Week 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joe Willie White Shoes

Joe Willie White Shoes

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, BigRy56 said:

Who could say no? We’ve been sold the future for over a decade and in the process, actually built a very strong roster. Time to push all of the chips in 

Rodgers has won only one SB in his career, despite all those home playoff games and great teams.  The chances that he leads the Jets to a SB win are pretty slim.  I'm not seeing how bringing in an old Rodgers on a ridiculous contract and giving up draft picks means the Jets are instant SB contenders.  I'm not sure he leads the Jets to the playoffs or that he can stay healthy for a full season.  It is a massive gamble with long odds.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurntDice

BurntDice

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Joe Willie White Shoes said:

Rodgers has won only one SB in his career, despite all those home playoff games and great teams.  The chances that he leads the Jets to a SB win are pretty slim.  I'm not seeing how bringing in an old Rodgers on a ridiculous contract and giving up draft picks means the Jets are instant SB contenders.  I'm not sure he leads the Jets to the playoffs or that he can stay healthy for a full season.  It is a massive gamble with long odds.  

That wasn’t the ops question, but Rodgers contact doesn’t seem ridiculous if traded for. I could be wrong, but from what I gather it’s 2 years at around 45 mil total. That is very reasonable. He’d probably retire after that. As far as draft picks I can’t imagine it would be much more than one 1st because of his age. That isn’t franchise altering compensation whatsoever 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bla bla bla

bla bla bla

Posted
Posted

I'm totally down for a SB push but I don't get why people are so doom and gloom on the future. We are going to have a massive cap hit, 3 years from now, that we can plan all other contracts around.

You'd likely let Becton and Elijah Moore walk after 2024 and see if you can get some comp picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bla bla bla

bla bla bla

Posted
Posted
Just now, BurntDice said:

That wasn’t the ops question, but Rodgers contact doesn’t seem ridiculous if traded for. I could be wrong, but from what I gather it’s 2 years at around 45 mil total. That is very reasonable. He’d probably retire after that 

'23: $15m

'24: $32m

'25: Retires $60m dead cap hit

 

I feel like we can plan for a $60m hit if we have 3 years to know its coming.

  • Upvote 3
  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurntDice

BurntDice

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, bla bla bla said:

'23: $15m

'24: $32m

'25: Retires $60m dead cap hit

 

I feel like we can plan for a $60m hit if we have 3 years to know its coming.

Definitely and in 3 years who knows how much the cap will increase. I’d much rather make a push now while we have a bunch of good pieces on cheap deals 

  • Upvote 2
  • Post of the Week 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
bitonti

bitonti

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
31 minutes ago, Mogglez said:

  If you could guarantee me a Jets ring within the next two years, but it would have to be followed by a Browns-level decade, I would agree to that in a New York minute.

Browns fans call it a Jets level decade 

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Green Ghost

Green Ghost

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Mogglez said:

I want to witness a single team of mine win a championship before I die.  If you could guarantee me a Jets ring within the next two years, but it would have to be followed by a Browns-level decade, I would agree to that in a New York minute.

We are worse than the Browns, have been since 2018, and probably will be going forward.

Say what you will about Watson and his off field issue, but he’s the kind of QB we dream about.

  • Upvote 1
  • Doh! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lurker89

Lurker89

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Lurker89 said:

Silly hypothetical realistically there is no guarantee we get a SB ... if inheriting this contract truly means we have to write off two or three years in the future I'd rather **** a cheese grater.

If the contract can be reworked into something not insane I'm down.

 

2 hours ago, neckdemon said:

lol but the point of the question is IF it were a definite to win the superbowl would you be ok with it if the next 2 years were total rebuilds basically. you must be a blast at parties.....you probably tell the girl in your wet dreams "you know we really shouldn't do this without a condom"

Did you miss the part where I **** a cheese grater... that's the definition of a blast at a party. I emplore you to find better entertainment than that north of the border.

I tell the girl in my dreams " I just ****ed a cheese grater so it's a mess down there but if you're game I'm game"

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alworth

Alworth

Posted
Posted

I'm 73 years old and have been following the NFL since seeing the '55 Championship game (Browns/Rams) on TV, Yet  I DON"T want to go the superstar traveling mercenary route to the extreme represented by an A-Rod signing. And for me, in the current NFL, QB play is boring--sticky gloves for the receivers, permissible intentional grounding outside of the pocket, etc. For me, the passing game is for the most part  not much more interesting than watching kicked extra points. I like to appreciate what the other 21 guys on the field are all about. (I don't care that it's a QB driven-league),

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hex

Hex

Posted
Posted

I picked both, but leaning towards yes, whatever. I don't want the horror show that is the Rams to be the Jets after an SB, but I think the benefits of finally winning one greatly outweighs the cons. That said, Aaron Rodgers was on 3 straight 13 win seasons and couldn't finish it. Getting him isn't a guarantee, but if for the sake of hypotheticals it is then sure, totally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dunnie

Dunnie

Posted
Posted
I'm 73 years old and have been following the NFL since seeing the '55 Championship game (Browns/Rams) on TV, Yet  I DON"T want to go the superstar traveling mercenary route to the extreme represented by an A-Rod signing. And for me, in the current NFL, QB play is boring--sticky gloves for the receivers, permissible intentional grounding outside of the pocket, etc. For me, the passing game is for the most part  not much more interesting than watching kicked extra points. I like to appreciate what the other 21 guys on the field are all about. (I don't care that it's a QB driven-league),
Refreshing perspective... Thanks for this ... But c'mon ... You want a SB right ?

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company

NY Jets Podcast

NY Jets Podcast
×
×
  • Create New...