jvill 51 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 5 minutes ago, Verbal said: I did point to it and invite discussion, but when people kept referring to "my case", I simply let them know it wasn't and that I was agreeing with what Hess called out. I'm responsible because I voted, not sure how I'm abdicating anything there. 2 hours ago, JiFields said: And his "case" was weak sauce and it's kind of similar to what he's doing w/ you, so it's also a bit hypocritical in nature. 2 hours ago, Verbal said: Second bold: it wasn't my case - are you reading the game? And where am I being hypocritical? Please explain. This is the exchange I was referring to. JiF says “your” case was weak, you say it’s not my case. Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but to me this comes off more like “don’t call my case weak, call Hess’ case weak” than a simple correction of the record. And if it is a correction of the record it’s a pretty useless one since you’ve essentially adopted the reasoning anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.