Jump to content

Fox Sports Analysts Discuss Darrelle Revis & Joe Klecko Hall Of Fame Case | New York Jets | NFL


jetsons

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, New York Mick said:

What’s the summary? I can’t listen to it at the moment

59 minutes ago, jetsons said:

When you have a moment you can listen to it. ;)

19 minutes ago, New York Mick said:

Or you could give a summary 

17 minutes ago, freestater said:

Or you could post a summary to your link

 

@New York Mick I can fax you a link to the summary.  But I can only do that after you listen to it.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

 

@New York Mick I can fax you a link to the summary.  But I can only do that after you listen to it.

Can you fax a summary of it?

It’s common courtesy to post a summary of a video for those people who can’t listen to it because they’re at work, in a place they can’t play it or just don’t want to listen to it. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, johnnysd said:

Klecko is a formality and Revis is one of at worst Top 10 CBs in NFL history 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I will differ and agree with you regarding Revis.  When Revis was at the top of his game, there was no one better in the NFL.  The problem is that Revis was only great for a handful of years, and his decline was precipitous.  After he left the Jets, I think he was in decline.  The first year back with the Jets, he was very good but not great.  The second year back with the Jets, he was downright awful.  From his rookie year, 2007 to 2012, those 6 years he was great.  I would argue that years 7-8, when he was with Tampa Bay and New England, he was very good, but no longer great. In 2015 with the Jets, he was good, but not worth near the money he was getting paid by the Jets,  In year #10, he was downright awful.  6 Great years, 3 very good years, 1 good year, and then turned to complete garbage.  

Personally, I agree that that is not a good enough resume to be considered great, but those years 1-6 he was great.  At least years 1-5.  Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alka said:

I will differ and agree with you regarding Revis.  When Revis was at the top of his game, there was no one better in the NFL.  The problem is that Revis was only great for a handful of years, and his decline was precipitous.  After he left the Jets, I think he was in decline.  The first year back with the Jets, he was very good but not great.  The second year back with the Jets, he was downright awful.  From his rookie year, 2007 to 2012, those 6 years he was great.  I would argue that years 7-8, when he was with Tampa Bay and New England, he was very good, but no longer great. In 2015 with the Jets, he was good, but not worth near the money he was getting paid by the Jets,  In year #10, he was downright awful.  6 Great years, 3 very good years, 1 good year, and then turned to complete garbage.  

Personally, I agree that that is not a good enough resume to be considered great, but those years 1-6 he was great.  At least years 1-5.  Just my opinion.

I actually agree with that, but for those 6 years he was among the Top 5 corners EVER if nor higher than that. Plus he did get the Super Bowl ring which matters to some voters. Would be shocked if he is not unanimous to be honest.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alka said:

I will differ and agree with you regarding Revis.  When Revis was at the top of his game, there was no one better in the NFL.  The problem is that Revis was only great for a handful of years, and his decline was precipitous.  After he left the Jets, I think he was in decline.  The first year back with the Jets, he was very good but not great.  The second year back with the Jets, he was downright awful.  From his rookie year, 2007 to 2012, those 6 years he was great.  I would argue that years 7-8, when he was with Tampa Bay and New England, he was very good, but no longer great. In 2015 with the Jets, he was good, but not worth near the money he was getting paid by the Jets,  In year #10, he was downright awful.  6 Great years, 3 very good years, 1 good year, and then turned to complete garbage.  

Personally, I agree that that is not a good enough resume to be considered great, but those years 1-6 he was great.  At least years 1-5.  Just my opinion.

Revis is a sure HOF player.  No doubt.  Klecko is way more on the the borderline than Revis.  Klecko played in an era where there were lots of great Defensive lineman.  Revis was arguably the best Cornerback in the league for a few years and there were a couple of year he would be in the argument as as good as anyone in the game historically.  Klecko doesn't come close to that measuring stick.  

I would love to see Klecko get in but Revis is way more a slam dunk than Klecko.

  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Biggs said:

Revis is a sure HOF player.  No doubt.  Klecko is way more on the the borderline than Revis.  Klecko played in an era where there were lots of great Defensive lineman.  Revis was arguably the best Cornerback in the league for a few years and there were a couple of year he would be in the argument as as good as anyone in the game historically.  Klecko doesn't come close to that measuring stick.  

I would love to see Klecko get in but Revis is way more a slam dunk than Klecko.

Klecko made the probowl at 3 different positions.  Nose tackle, tackle, and defensive end.  No one else has ever done that.  One year, he got over 20 sacks.  Only a dozen or so defensive linemen have ever gotten 20 sacks in a season.  There are several Hall Of Fame offensive linemen who have openly stated that Joe Klecko deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.  When he played healthy, he was dominant!  No one questioned that.  

I don't question that Revis is a sure HOF player.  I believe and know that his immense skills began to diminish  starting after about 6 or 7 years.

  • Post of the Week 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2023 at 7:05 PM, New York Mick said:

Can you fax a summary of it?

It’s common courtesy to post a summary of a video for those people who can’t listen to it because they’re at work, in a place they can’t play it or just don’t want to listen to it. 

It’s just Bradshaw, Howie Long, and Strahan saying Klecko and Revis were awesome, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alka said:

Klecko made the probowl at 3 different positions.  Nose tackle, tackle, and defensive end.  No one else has ever done that.  One year, he got over 20 sacks.  Only a dozen or so defensive linemen have ever gotten 20 sacks in a season.  There are several Hall Of Fame offensive linemen who have openly stated that Joe Klecko deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.  When he played healthy, he was dominant!  No one questioned that.  

I don't question that Revis is a sure HOF player.  I believe and know that his immense skills began to diminish  starting after about 6 or 7 years.

Klecko was all pro twice.  Revis 4 times.  Revis was a more dominating player at his peak and had more peak years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...