Jump to content

HOLD FIRM, WOODY


Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Rangers9 said:

I agree Jets have the leverage GB desperately doesn't want to pay AR that 60 mil for 2023. So if anyone is desperate it's them not us. 

I hope some in the media begin to haggle packers with questions of “ If Rodgers is not traded to the Jets, Will you start him over, or have him as backup to Jordan you said you were fully committed to ?” ? That will be a uncomfortable question for them that will just be asked more and more if this is dragged on. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Beerfish said:

The best part of this clever jets genius scenario is the part where we get off to a bad start like the Packers did last year and we can all say that rodgers is not familiar with his receivers, just like last year.

If Rodgers is in it full force and not half retired, half assed he needs to be here for the voluntary part of the off season workouts.

Could this end up being the scenario?  Yes.  But it is not the best scenario for the Jets.

If Baker freaking mayfield can have game of his life with new team 2 days after being traded , we need to stop worrying so much about 1 of the all time best who will have familiar Oc and some familiar WRs.

  • Upvote 1
  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, neckdemon said:

if the deal doesn't happen for one reason or another we are ****ed and will be starting zach wilson most likely. it will be even worse if thew reaosn the deal doesn't happen is because in the midst of this staredown another team swoops in and offers enough and rodgers is willing to play there...then he goes on to a championship game or super bowl. and we are stuk with the sh*ttiest qb in the league again and no solution

Woody will fire JD and Saleh before first game if Zach is penciled in as qb1. There are million other better options. Throw a 4th or 5th rounder for a capable qb if none are FAs 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thumb Down 1
  • WTF? 1
  • More Ugh 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, neckdemon said:

if the deal doesn't happen for one reason or another we are ****ed and will be starting zach wilson most likely. it will be even worse if thew reaosn the deal doesn't happen is because in the midst of this staredown another team swoops in and offers enough and rodgers is willing to play there...then he goes on to a championship game or super bowl. and we are stuk with the sh*ttiest qb in the league again and no solution

Starting ZW in year 3 has always been the plan since the moment we drafted him 2nd overall. Woody told Douglas to get a Vet QB in here for 2023....an attempt to go off the reservation and find a top QB NOW. Joe's trying. If it falls thru, then yep, back to Plan A.

  • Upvote 1
  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Greg555 said:

What’s acceptable?  A 2 pick this year + a guy from a position of depth? (CDavis).  Or say..CDavis and a conditional 1 in ‘24?

too much?

just have to keep #13 pick this draft, obviously 

I'd bet this year's first is the sticking point. Packers want it and the Jets don't wanna give it up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nycdan said:

This ridiculous take keeps popping up.  It's wrong.  It's nonsense.

JD is not getting fired.  Woody has been part of the process from the get go.  The GM who drafted OROY and DROY just last season is not getting fired.  He's getting extended no matter what happens.  

Saleh is not getting fired over the Rodgers deal.  Not his area of responsibility.  He might be in trouble if the Jets underwhelm this season.

Maybe pivot to a more reasonable take like we should trade Quinnen Williams because he wants to be paid.  That always gets lots of upvotes.

Sorry should have clarified. There is NO WAY in hell JD would ever go into this season with Zach penciled in as the number 1. Nothing to do with rodgers deal, but if that did no way would JD be allowed to hand the team to Zach. There will be someone else coming in no doubt about it. Earlier poster insinuated it could be zach if not Rodgers. No way in hell..

  • Upvote 2
  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, neckdemon said:

I'd bet this year's first is the sticking point. Packers want it and the Jets don't wanna give it up

Well, JD should make our pick at 13, then call packers and ask if they want to deal rodgers before the 2nd round pick. Otherwise that window will close for them too.. 

  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jets are in control and Joe D knows it.  Rodgers went on TV to say he was playing for us next year.  That makes it impossible to bring him back.  The Packers told Rodgers and their fans that they don't want him.  How could they  ever go back and pay $60MM per to that guy.  Wait until after the draft and offer a 3rd rounder in 2024 that can become a #2 if we win and Rodgers comes back in 2024.

  • Upvote 1
  • Sympathy 1
  • Post of the Week 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2023 at 11:56 AM, playtowinthegame said:

I agree with everything Florio said. RELAX Jets fans. Those in the media saying the Packers have the leverage are like Baghdad Bob pushing Packers propaganda.

It's talk like this that's going to make the pain when the realization occurs that somehow Rodgers will not be coming to the Jets.

Somehow this trade is going to go off the rails....  as Jet fans we're always getting screwed....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, talonmm said:

It's talk like this that's going to make the pain when the realization occurs that somehow Rodgers will not be coming to the Jets.

Somehow this trade is going to go off the rails....  as Jet fans we're always getting screwed....

Nah, worse case scenario we'll survive and continue building the JD way next year while we trade for someone like Stafford or the ilk for now.  The sky is not falling!  JD is bringing us along just fine.  Sux he struck out on Zack though :(    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Flashlite80 said:

The Jets are in control and Joe D knows it.  Rodgers went on TV to say he was playing for us next year.  That makes it impossible to bring him back.  The Packers told Rodgers and their fans that they don't want him.  How could they  ever go back and pay $60MM per to that guy.  Wait until after the draft and offer a 3rd rounder in 2024 that can become a #2 if we win and Rodgers comes back in 2024.

By in control you mean the Jets are all in on Rodgers for 1 year and the Packers want nothing to do with him and will unload him for practically nothing which is what he is currently worth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, talonmm said:

It's talk like this that's going to make the pain when the realization occurs that somehow Rodgers will not be coming to the Jets.

Somehow this trade is going to go off the rails....  as Jet fans we're always getting screwed....

Screwed how. With Zack we get the #1 pick and get our QB that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Claymation said:

 

The NFL schedule makers should just plan accordingly that Rodgers is the Jets quarterback. It's just a matter of Green Bay coming to grips that the 74th overall pick this year, along with a conditional next year, is the best deal they will get from the Jets for Rodgers. If they wait until after the Jets make their 74th pick, the Packers are getting less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, playtowinthegame said:

The NFL schedule makers should just plan accordingly that Rodgers is the Jets quarterback. It's just a matter of Green Bay coming to grips that the 74th overall pick this year, along with a conditional next year, is the best deal they will get from the Jets for Rodgers. If they wait until after the Jets make their 74th pick, the Packers are getting less.

Sorry but the Packers are getting a 2023 2nd+ from the Jets for Rodgers. The quicker you come to that reality, the less disappointed you will be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...