Popular Post Maxman Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Zachtomims47 Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 Pivot RIGHT NOW you sons of bitches. 6 4 2 8 2 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Matt39 Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 Anyone signing up for his newsletter? 3 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post frankiepapa Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 LeverageSent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post maury77 Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 1 minute ago, frankiepapa said: Leverage Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk Yup. Start negotiating with Baltimore and make it known (even if you don't want Lamar). 8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bitonti Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 There are reports of owner level collusion against Lamar That seems like exactly the type of thing woody would be in favor of 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Warfish Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 Hopefully JD isn't one of the people "that's has met" him recently. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Get this done JD 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Warfish Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 Just now, bitonti said: There's reports of owner level collusion against Lamar Speculation by the usual tin foil hat crowd =/= reports. 8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heymangold Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 do it. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heymangold Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 2 minutes ago, Warfish said: Speculation by the usual tin foil hat crowd =/= reports. i'd imagine this time it's true though. no owner wants to pay guaranteed contracts. especially HUGE numbers like Watson got. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post islesmb Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 8 minutes ago, Zachtomims47 said: Pivot RIGHT NOW you sons of bitches. 2 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Darnold's Forehead Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 F*ck it trade for both 1 1 5 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Just now, Darnold's Forehead said: F*ck it trade for both Yep, competition 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RutgersJetFan Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 Just now, Warfish said: Speculation by the usual tin foil hat crowd =/= reports. NFLPA and Smith himself have said it too. Ol' boys club have been sued for it a few times over the years, it's really not that outlandish. 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post The Crusher Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 15 minutes ago, Maxman said: @JiF4Lamar 1 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post nycdan Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 1 minute ago, heymangold said: i'd imagine this time it's true though. no owner wants to pay guaranteed contracts. especially HUGE numbers like Watson got. This is the crux of Lamar's problem. If he were open to taking a Josh Allen contract, I think there would be interest. The most compelling thing to me is what's up with Burrow? Are he and CIN stuck on the same issue? If they agree on a deal that doesn't have Watson terms, it would severely undermine Lamar's position. Would he come down to earth at that point? Because nobody in their right mind would say Lamar is worth more than Burrow. Herbert is another 4th year guy who is probably a better comp. Not sure if those deals are waiting to see how Lamar nets out but it'll be compelling to see who blinks first and what happens from there. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 1 minute ago, islesmb said: I watched Friends for the first time in about 5 years yesterday morning, and this was the episode I saw. ? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post nycdan Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 3 minutes ago, Tranquilo said: Yep, competition Zach would make both their lives hell. 2 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman10023 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 wasn't he offer 3 years 133MM fully guaranteed? he just wasn't given the guarantee he wants. let's see what someone is willing to pay him (and pay baltimore) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post peebag Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 7 minutes ago, heymangold said: i'd imagine this time it's true though. no owner wants to pay guaranteed contracts. especially HUGE numbers like Watson got. I imagine Browns ownership is being met with sunshine and lollipops at the league meeting. 2 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dbatesman Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 7 minutes ago, heymangold said: i'd imagine this time it's true though. no owner wants to pay guaranteed contracts. especially HUGE numbers like Watson got. 6 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said: NFLPA and Smith himself have said it too. Ol' boys club have been sued for it a few times over the years, it's really not that outlandish. certainly a group of rich assholes would never do something illegal and unethical 4 2 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guilhermezmc Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 So…. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 1 minute ago, batman10023 said: wasn't he offer 3 years 133MM fully guaranteed? No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NYJCAP2 Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 Semantics much? He’s free to negotiate with any team currently. He needs an agent. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 8 minutes ago, heymangold said: i'd imagine this time it's true though. no owner wants to pay guaranteed contracts. especially HUGE numbers like Watson got. EVery contract is guaranteed to a point. Watsons just happens to be guaranteed over the full life of the contract. Calling NFL deals non guaranteed is a bit misleading. Plus in Jackson’s case you have to cough up two firsts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman10023 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 6 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said: NFLPA and Smith himself have said it too. Ol' boys club have been sued for it a few times over the years, it's really not that outlandish. not really sure why the NFLPA is so focused on looking out for the top 1% of players with the guarantee contract. The pot that gets paid out to players is the same no matter how it's broken up among the players. more guaranteed contracts just means the vast majority of other players get less money. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post slats Posted March 27 Popular Post Share Posted March 27 I feel like Jackson is coming off as both entitled and ungrateful. Baltimore drafted him when he was about to drop out of the first first round, and specifically designed an offense tailored to his strengths and concealing his weaknesses. His entire beef appears to be his hard line for a contract, to the point that he wants out now? I’d advise him to be careful about what he wants. I don’t think there are too many coaches/organizations who are as capable of putting him in such a position to succeed. As for the Jets, they can’t develop a traditional QB. Jackson would be a nightmare of Russell Wilson proportions here, and maybe worse. 22 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Just now, Matt39 said: EVery contract is guaranteed to a point. Watsons just happens to be guaranteed over the full life of the contract. Calling NFL deals non guaranteed is a bit misleading. Plus in Jackson’s case you have to cough up two firsts. Even in a trade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 1 minute ago, Green Ghost said: Even in a trade? If Jackson is traded he’s getting a new deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 1 minute ago, batman10023 said: not really sure why the NFLPA is so focused on looking out for the top 1% of players with the guarantee contract. The pot that gets paid out to players is the same no matter how it's broken up among the players. more guaranteed contracts just means the vast majority of other players get less money. Raise the bar. Same reason the MLBPA didn’t want ARod to sign his deal with the Red Sox years ago. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batman10023 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 6 minutes ago, Green Ghost said: No. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 1 minute ago, Matt39 said: If Jackson is traded he’s getting a new deal. Obviously, but that’s not what I asked you. Can’t the Ravens agree to a trade for less than two #1 picks if they want? It would be better than having him sit out a season and they get nothing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.