Zach Wilson vs. Daniel Jones vs. Garropolo (Bills and Cowboys)

[RoadFan]

 

Garropolo vs. Buffalo  16/25   185  1TD, 2 INT.  10 points.

Z. Wilson vs. Buffalo  14/21  140  1TD, 1 INT.  16 points

 

Daniel Jones vs. Dallas.  15/28  104  2 INT, 43 rushing yards.  0 points.

Z. Wilson vs. Dallas.  12/27  170   1TD, 3 INT, 36 rushing yards.  10 points. 

 

The point is, he played similar games against two very good defenses as a couple of the more “respectable “ QBs.   Are the other backup-caliber QBs being discussed really going to be a big improvement?  I think, just stay with him a little longer…

[DireJet]

[Hex]

I mean, there's not point in arguing about "staying with him a little longer" or whatever. We're not a collective GM or something like that. I don't see any reason for him to suddenly improve fast enough at this point to play well enough to win games. If he does from some miracle, great. I don't see that happening anymore.

[Jetsfan80]

Ah yes, quite the bar you’re setting here.  Wilson vs two massively overpaid doofuses.  

[Saul Goodman]

Let’s see last year’s stats now. 

[RoadFan]

5 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Ah yes, quite the bar you’re setting here.  Wilson vs two massively overpaid doofuses.  

I get that.  The difference? Zach Wilson is improving.  Sure, the argument of going fron dog sh*t to poop argument exists.   But Garropolo plateaued years ago and Daniel Jones just got paid like a franchise QB.  

I haven’t quit on him just yet…

[Jetsfan80]

1 minute ago, RoadFan said:

I get that.  The difference? Zach Wilson is getting better.  Garropolo plateaued years ago and Daniel Jones just got paid like a franchise QB.  

 

It’s not moving the needle much at all my man.  He won’t be a top 40 QB until his time with the Jets is over.  

[Hex]

1 minute ago, RoadFan said:

I get that.  The difference? Zach Wilson is getting better.  Garropolo plateaued years ago and Daniel Jones just got paid like a franchise QB.  

 

Yea, he's getting better. At this rate he'll be the next Geno Smith.

[Bronx]

Superbowel bound!

[SomebodytoAnybody47]

7 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Ah yes, quite the bar you’re setting here.  Wilson vs two massively overpaid doofuses.  

Oh please. You would love those two doofuses. 

[Jetsfan80]

Just now, Zachtomims47 said:

Oh please. You would love those two doofuses. 

Not a chance for that price.  I was never in favor of Jimmy G nor have I ever liked Daniel Jones. 

[Skeptable]

14 minutes ago, RoadFan said:

 

 

Garropolo vs. Buffalo  16/25   185  1TD, 2 INT.  10 points.

Z. Wilson vs. Buffalo  14/21  140  1TD, 1 INT.  16 points

 

Daniel Jones vs. Dallas.  15/28  104  2 INT, 43 rushing yards.  0 points.

Z. Wilson vs. Dallas.  12/27  170   1TD, 3 INT, 36 rushing yards.  10 points. 

 

The point is, he played similar games against two very good defenses as a couple of the more “respectable “ QBs.   Are the other backup-caliber QBs being discussed really going to be a big improvement?  I think, just stay with him a little longer…

Don't try to show actual stats.... The anti-Zach crowd is out for blood even though he wasn't the issue...

Giving up 30 points is a big issue. Not giving Zach anytime to drop back or moving away from the run is bad coaching moves.