kevinc855 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 A win would make Vikings 0-4 with Kansas City next week. This may be more important than the Jet game. Vikings 1-5 or 0-6 at the bye make the cousins trade make a whole lot of sense for them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Warfish Posted September 27 Popular Post Share Posted September 27 3 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: A win would make Vikings 0-4 with Kansas City next week. This may be more important than the Jet game. Vikings 1-5 or 0-6 at the bye make the cousins trade make a while lol of sense for them. Why do we need a part-year Cousins rental if we ourselves are also 1-5? 11 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heymangold Posted September 27 Popular Post Share Posted September 27 jets ain't trading for Cousins. they just brought in Trever fckin Siemian as a "vet qb". That's all they're doing. 7 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post UntouchableCrew Posted September 27 Popular Post Share Posted September 27 22 minutes ago, heymangold said: jets ain't trading for Cousins. they just brought in Trever fckin Siemian as a "vet qb". That's all they're doing. Seems pretty obvious the Jets aren’t making a real move at QB. 2 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 38 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: A win would make Vikings 0-4 with Kansas City next week. This may be more important than the Jet game. Vikings 1-5 or 0-6 at the bye make the cousins trade make a while lol of sense for them. No way woody allows this GM to trade any more future resources with everyone job security up in the air right now. They are talking about this being potentially one of the deepest drafts ever, if we trade any draft picks for a one year rental, failure JAG it would be the heights of Jetsy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreened Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 Lol trading for Cousins at 1-5. Are you going to make a thread every week dedicated to the Vikings next opponent? 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post The Crusher Posted September 27 Popular Post Share Posted September 27 44 minutes ago, Warfish said: Why do we need a part-year Cousins rental if we ourselves are also 1-5? We don’t but Kevin is kinda nuts,? 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 59 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: A win would make Vikings 0-4 with Kansas City next week. This may be more important than the Jet game. Vikings 1-5 or 0-6 at the bye make the cousins trade make a while lol of sense for them. We'll be 1-5 as well. So it'd be pointless to make that trade. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreened Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 minutes ago, Bobby816 said: We'll be 1-5 as well. So it'd be pointless to make that trade. Not if we Jet up hard enough on Sunday Night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 37 minutes ago, oatmeal said: No way woody allows this GM to trade any more future resources with everyone job security up in the air right now. They are talking about this being potentially one of the deepest drafts ever, if we trade any draft picks for a one year rental, failure JAG it would be the heights of Jetsy Are you serious?! Oh man. Of course we don't have a 2nd rounder this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAustrian Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 46 minutes ago, oatmeal said: No way woody allows this GM to trade any more future resources with everyone job security up in the air right now. They are talking about this being potentially one of the deepest drafts ever, if we trade any draft picks for a one year rental, failure JAG it would be the heights of Jetsy Root for tanking After 3 games instead of wanting a legit qb on the roster is the jetsiest thing ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 11 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: Are you serious?! Oh man. Of course we don't have a 2nd rounder this year. Yup the PFF draft dudes are super excited about this year compared to others 3 minutes ago, TheAustrian said: Root for tanking After 3 games instead of wanting a legit qb on the roster is the jetsiest thing ever Root for tanking? Was I the one who assembled this roster? It looks like your GM was/is the person “rooting for tanking” Oh excuse me, you are probably one of those lost souls who thinks we insert any random QB it will magically turn this train wreck around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 minutes ago, oatmeal said: Yup the PFF draft dudes are super excited about this year compared to others If we're as bad as expected going into the trade deadline, I hope JD sells off assets for draft picks. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlightBoyz Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 I have no clue what the organization is thinking at this point. Prob one more shot for Zach against KC on a short leash. If its an absolute disaster you would think they'd explore a trade for someone who can salvage the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted September 27 Author Share Posted September 27 1 hour ago, oatmeal said: No way woody allows this GM to trade any more future resources with everyone job security up in the air right now. They are talking about this being potentially one of the deepest drafts ever, if we trade any draft picks for a one year rental, failure JAG it would be the heights of Jetsy We aren’t giving up the first for him so what gives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted September 27 Author Share Posted September 27 1 hour ago, Warfish said: Why do we need a part-year Cousins rental if we ourselves are also 1-5? We will beat Denver. Softer schedule on second half. You truly think woody is ok with punting on this season? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted September 27 Author Share Posted September 27 Why do you guys think the jets would “tank” for another untested rookie qb? Not happening and the defense isn’t bad enough to get us a top pick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: We will beat Denver. Softer schedule on second half. You truly think woody is ok with punting on this season? Not as soft as it seems. The division games are likely all L's. And the other games (at Vegas, vs Atlanta, vs Houston, vs Washington, at Cleveland) will all be toss-ups at best. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 1 hour ago, kevinc855 said: A win would make Vikings 0-4 with Kansas City next week. This may be more important than the Jet game. Vikings 1-5 or 0-6 at the bye make the cousins trade make a whole lot of sense for them. Explain to me why a 1-4 team would be buyers when the 0-5 team has a fire sale. Not being sarcastic here, like, I just don’t get it - but haven’t stayed current with the rumor mill. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreened Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 18 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: Why do you guys think the jets would “tank” for another untested rookie qb? Not happening and the defense isn’t bad enough to get us a top pick. They aren’t tanking. Their answer is Trevor Siemien. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhg1084 Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 So we already don’t have our 2nd rd pick next season and now we’re trading more assets for a rental when we’re about to be 1-5 ourselves? I don’t see it happening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted September 27 Author Share Posted September 27 2 minutes ago, Rhg1084 said: So we already don’t have our 2nd rd pick next season and now we’re trading more assets for a rental when we’re about to be 1-5 ourselves? I don’t see it happening Vikings can get a 4th round pick now or nothing for cousins at the end of the year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extmenace Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 hours ago, kevinc855 said: A win would make Vikings 0-4 with Kansas City next week. This may be more important than the Jet game. Vikings 1-5 or 0-6 at the bye make the cousins trade make a whole lot of sense for them. Why would the jets give up draft capital and or a good player or both with a similar record. I personally think a cousins deal is a real possibility but it’s only going to happen if this team is sitting close to .500 by week 6-7. That will be tough considering this offense cannot surpass 16 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: Vikings can get a 4th round pick now or nothing for cousins at the end of the year They are probably going to get a compensatory 2025 3rd for him, so I assume it will take a bit more 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 27 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: Why do you guys think the jets would “tank” for another untested rookie qb? Not happening and the defense isn’t bad enough to get us a top pick. Because that's what they've indicated they're willing to do. If the team was serious about making the playoffs they would have turned over every stone and had multiple QBs visiting the facility on September 12th. Playoffs were very much achievable if we moved quickly. If we start 1-5 and the locker room is in revolt it's too late. The goose is cooked and we're picking in the top 5. I don't get the "this team is too talented to tank" talk. We lost 7 of our last 8 last year and the last two weeks that's what the team has looked like. We're playing non-competitive football. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trotter Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 i dont see Woody going to Cousins. He stiffed him a few years ago and i think said some not so great things about the jets. Now you get him on a 1-3, 1-4 team on a 1 year rental and you think he is going to ball out? He will take Woody's money for this year and take every precaution not to get injured for his next team. Woody might not be the smartest guy but even he is not this dumb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronx Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 hours ago, Warfish said: Why do we need a part-year Cousins rental if we ourselves are also 1-5? We are sticking with the majority of this roster next year and we will draft a rookie. The AR experiment will be short lived and we will have a generational QB on deck, ready to take this team to the promise land. Then again, we are the NY Jets; so we will probably draft another bust QB and we will continue pain and misery in this purgatory until the end of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darnold Schwarzenegger Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 30 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: Why do you guys think the jets would “tank” for another untested rookie qb? Not happening and the defense isn’t bad enough to get us a top pick. But the offense sure is. Defense gave up 13 points last week. The result…… loss. need to keep drafting qbs until we find 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darnold Schwarzenegger Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 13 minutes ago, GangGreened said: They aren’t tanking. Their answer is Trevor Siemien. When the answer is Trevor siemien you are truly f*cked 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonkertons Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 hours ago, heymangold said: jets ain't trading for Cousins. they just brought in Trever fckin Siemian as a "vet qb". That's all they're doing. You got inside info? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBJ Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 26 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: Explain to me why a 1-4 team would be buyers when the 0-5 team has a fire sale. Not being sarcastic here, like, I just don’t get it - but haven’t stayed current with the rumor mill. Stockholm Syndrome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted September 27 Author Share Posted September 27 13 minutes ago, UntouchableCrew said: . The goose is cooked and we're picking in the top 5. You are going to be upset when December rolls around and we beat the Falcons, Texans and Commanders. We arent bad enough to pick top 5. "Tanking" with a young talented roster on rookie contracts for maybe the 4th best QB of the draft who will redshirt for at least 2 years and is essentially a lottery ticket (see Zach Wilson or Sam Darnold) makes zero sense. You play to end the playoff streak, and gain positive momentum with a team with its head up in 2024. Want to draft a QB with the 22nd or 23rdish pick? Have at it. Or get a player that can help in 24 with that pick and take a flyer in the 3rd? Depends. Cousins wont cost more then a 4th at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 2 hours ago, UntouchableCrew said: Seems pretty obvious the Jets aren’t making a real move at QB. They want to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 1 hour ago, kevinc855 said: We will beat Denver. I've seen nothing to indicate thats an accurate or reliable prediction. Just cause the Phins smashed them doesn't mean we'll beat them. 1 hour ago, kevinc855 said: Softer schedule on second half. You truly think woody is ok with punting on this season? I don't think it matters what Woody is ok with at this point. At 1-5, you do not trade draft assets for a rental less-than-one-year QB trying to salvage an already lost at that point season. If any Cousins trade was going to happen, it had to happen now. At 1-5, it's far too late. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 59 minutes ago, Bronx said: We are sticking with the majority of this roster next year and we will draft a rookie. The AR experiment will be short lived and we will have a generational QB on deck, ready to take this team to the promise land. Then again, we are the NY Jets; so we will probably draft another bust QB and we will continue pain and misery in this purgatory until the end of time. There are no "generational" QB's in the 2024 draft. That word is the most overused and least accurate word in all of NFL football. I expect if the Jets do wind up with a high pick, they'd somehow get the USC QB, because we always do, and he'll bust, like USC QB's always do, especially as NY Jets. Same old Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_(cropped).thumb.jpg.915acafebcbfac6c6ff1d21110a6bbef.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now