Jump to content

Zach’s villain arc has begun


Recommended Posts

Jordan Plamer was on a podcast last week (really great guy to listen to if you love football) and was talking specifically about QBs and how hard it is to predict which guys will make it.  He said that if you dont have confidence and character then you have very little chance to make it in the NFL unless you are EXTREMELY talented.  
Do I think zach was a bit immature when he was picked - yes.
Do I think it was a HUGE jump from BYU to this media market (and fan base) - yes
Do I think its really hard to start as a rookie for almost every QB - yes.
Do I think a lot of this is on him for handling some situations poorly - yes.
But at the end of the day, there was a great video of his Pats performance next to his BYU tape and it was really stark to see how (yes he had a clean pocket at BYU) often he attacked single coverage down the field. The kid really just played - he didnt seem to be thinking all that much. 
I also understand while saleh had the inclination to coach zach to be conservative and not turn it over, that does make sense with a good defense but you also need to look at the player and the situation and see that something isnt working.  To me, Saleh needs to tell zach to "just play!  I dont care if you have 3 picks im staying with you".  Let the kid take shots like he did on sunday night, we have too many playmakers to be conservative and frankly we have nothing to lose.  Plus the OL is really playing well with this group and should give him time vs Denver.
Just let it rip zach!
Thing about Sunday is ... he didn't really have many (any?) plays that would count as "near interceptions" either. He was throwing lots but not taking bad risks. Often with "let it rip" you need to be lucky as well as good. He was just ... good. No luck required.

Boy does it feel weird writing that!

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing about Sunday is ... he didn't really have many (any?) plays that would count as "near interceptions" either. He was throwing lots but not taking bad risks. Often with "let it rip" you need to be lucky as well as good. He was just ... good. No luck required.

Boy does it feel weird writing that!

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Like an idiot, I say there counting Mississippi each time the ball was snapped and it's all about getting rid of it quick... not sure why it's taken so long to see this... need to get a w in Denver

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk


Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JoeNamathsFurCoat said:

Maybe they'll get exposed in the long run, but CJ Stroud and Anthony Richardson already look like franchise QBs.

Panthers may have whiffed taking Doug Flutie #1 overall.

 

As tape accumulates and defensive coordinators learn tendencies, the young QB job gets harder.  That's usually the root cause of the common "sophomore slump."  Frequently happens with rookie baseball players.  Hitting is harder the 2nd year, as pitchers figure out what you have trouble hitting.

The key is, can the young QB adapt to elevated defensive tenacity that takes away what they are best at?  Perfect example: Justin Fields.  If defenses are keying on his runs, then he has to up his passing game.  He hasn't.  It shows.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JoeNamathsFurCoat said:

Maybe they'll get exposed in the long run, but CJ Stroud and Anthony Richardson already look like franchise QBs.

Panthers may have whiffed taking Doug Flutie #1 overall.

A lot of these young QBs start off looking decent. Maybe not great but you see the potential and flashes. It’s just a matter of when they have their first bad game. Then their 2nd bad game. Then their first extended slump…Then when the confidence starts getting shaky, how do they respond? Most of these high draft picks have everything they need to be elite as far as physical traits go. The difference between the busts, good, and greats is the mental side.  The bad ones can’t get the confidence back, inconsistent guys can’t stay level headed and have ups and downs, and the legit starting qbs are very strong minded and never lose the confidence. 

if Zach wants to stick, he has to figure out a way to get the confidence back and then keep it. He has been completely broken up until Sunday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they'll get exposed in the long run, but CJ Stroud and Anthony Richardson already look like franchise QBs.
Panthers may have whiffed taking Doug Flutie #1 overall.
It's common .. especially for running QBs to take the world by surprise ... then the world catches up.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamesr said:

Thing about Sunday is ... he didn't really have many (any?) plays that would count as "near interceptions" either. He was throwing lots but not taking bad risks. Often with "let it rip" you need to be lucky as well as good. He was just ... good. No luck required.

Boy does it feel weird writing that! emoji16.png

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

That's not true. There were some near picks.

1) Screen play near the 2 minute warning before halftime, hit defender in the hands and dropped.

2) Zach didn't see the safety on the TD pass to Lazard. Luckily, it was just slightly behind Lazard and defender just missed it. 

3) 3rd and 11 overthrow to Cobb in 3rd quarter, directly to Edwards. Cobb made a great play to break it up as the defender.

Other than those, he was pretty sharp. Some really great throws especially to the TEs.

  • Upvote 2
  • More Ugh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jetluv58 said:

I think the Namath thing pissed him off. He’d had enough.

Then I hope Namath insults and offends him every week for the rest of his career, if that's what it takes to get actual performance/production from him.

Although I'd prefer it if Namath insults him even more, so we get four good quarters and a win out of him, not just a quarter and a drive of good play.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamesr said:

Thing about Sunday is ... he didn't really have many (any?) plays that would count as "near interceptions" either. He was throwing lots but not taking bad risks. Often with "let it rip" you need to be lucky as well as good. He was just ... good. No luck required.

Boy does it feel weird writing that! emoji16.png

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Correct me if im wrong, but didnt he also almost completely avoid the middle of the field?  GW throws were basically all out routes and the 2 big throws to the TEs were sideline throws.  Rogers said he didnt talk to zach much but it sure seems like zach took a page out of his book with avoiding the middle of the field, taking short outs and checkdowns and then taking shots down the field on the sideline.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamesr said:

Thing about Sunday is ... he didn't really have many (any?) plays that would count as "near interceptions" either. He was throwing lots but not taking bad risks. Often with "let it rip" you need to be lucky as well as good. He was just ... good. No luck required.

Boy does it feel weird writing that! emoji16.png

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Cobb broke up one pass that could have been intercepted if he didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, JetPotato said:

That's not true. There were some near picks.

1) Screen play near the 2 minute morning before halftime hit defender in the hands and dropped

2) Zach didn't see the safety on the TD pass to Lazard. Luckily, it was just slightly behind Lazard and defender just missed it. 

3) 3rd and 11 overthrow to Cobb in 3rd quarter, directly to Edwards. Cobb made a great play to break it up as the defender,

Other than those, he was pretty sharp. Some really great throws especially to the TEs.

Thanks - I did wonder if there were one or two I'd missed / forgotten. But off of 39 throws, if he was truly in "gunslinger" mode you'd expect a lot more, IMHO. 3 in 39 plays seems fairly run of the mill. As you say, he was sharp most of the time, and not requiring miracle catches by the receiver to get the completions. Most of his throws were where the receiver would want them to be, or where they needed to be to avoid the DB.

Long may it continue. :-) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...