Jump to content

I took this picture out of disbelief


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Beerfish said:

Should be no surprise to anyone.   Some people actually had the grey matter to suggest it was entirely Zach Wilsons fault and there would be big improvement with the next jag on the list.   Snort!

What the Heck are you talking about!!!!

Just Kidding!

We ALL KNOW BROOKS BOLLINGER SOLVES EVERYTHING.... or was it Greg McElroy????.........Remember those..... I DO!!!!

Hmmmmmm so we have heard this song before! :) 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Anthony Jet said:

Not saying hack is good. But I see designed plays with guys open…..a lot. Guys has nothing at all to work with. Thats life as an nfl football coordinator and he’ll probably end up paying the price but really don’t think it’s him as much as it’s just poor players all over the offense. 

image.png.4f97e34327ba590fbd783050f9933d58.png

  • Ugh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anthony Jet said:

Not saying hack is good. But I see designed plays with guys open…..a lot. Guys has nothing at all to work with. Thats life as an nfl football coordinator and he’ll probably end up paying the price but really don’t think it’s him as much as it’s just poor players all over the offense. 

First play of the game against the bills, ruckert was running wide open up the sideline. Zach checked down to Breece who dropped the ball… I’m no hack fan either… but that isn’t on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Hex said:

By what statistics? At least they used to get into the redzone.

Well we had 38 more yards passing this week than last week against the bills. We also only had only 2 turnovers this week compared to 4 last week. 

and we actually scored a td this week. Something we didn’t do against the raiders or chargers. 

we only punted 6 times. Which is 5 less than when we played the giants and punted 11 times. 
 

#progress 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rich Thornburgh said:

Why can’t it simply be both the quarterbacks and OL suck?

They both do suck, but the only thing that changed from earlier in the year to now, is the o-line cannot block anymore.

 

If the line was still healthy, they’d be scoring just enough to win these past few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jimmy 2 Times said:

They both do suck, but the only thing that changed from earlier in the year to now, is the o-line cannot block anymore.

 

If the line was still healthy, they’d be scoring just enough to win these past few weeks.

No they wouldn’t.  We got incredibly lucky in 3 out of the 4 wins.  Zach is not a competent qb.  He could have our 2009 offensive line in front of him you would still be trying to win every game 13-10 and hoping the other team’s kicker self destructs 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rich Thornburgh said:

No they wouldn’t.  We got incredibly lucky in 3 out of the 4 wins.  Zach is not a competent qb.  He could have our 2009 offensive line in front of him you would still be trying to win every game 13-10 and hoping the other team’s kicker self destructs 

The 2009 oline had a run game and that team only started to score when they traded for edwards.  What people seem to forget is they brought in Rodgers to replace Zach.  Now, if you want to be fair, you can say they brought in a different qb once Rodgers went down but even there Zach brought them to a 4-3 record. A little hard to justify a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Warfish said:

Nice to see people catching up to what I posted the day we hired him. 

Welcome folks, nice to have you aboard.

i was right there with you, hated this from day 1. I have a friend who is a huge broncos fan who texted me a ROFLMAO when we signed him, said, just wait till you see how bad he is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2009 oline had a run game and that team only started to score when they traded for edwards.  What people seem to forget is they brought in Rodgers to replace Zach.  Now, if you want to be fair, you can say they brought in a different qb once Rodgers went down but even there Zach brought them to a 4-3 record. A little hard to justify a change.


No it wasn’t hard to justify change. EVERYONE was screaming that the QB was holding us back. The teams squeaked out some wins with 4 defense turnover games and instead of not wasting a good defense and a team still playing hard we waited until the team quit before making a change to a qb almost as bad as Zach


Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...