Alworth Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 My question assumes that the defense is worth saving. Yes, there's a bit of padding in the Jets number 1 rank in yards per play and number three rank in yards per game because teams chose to run on us at an above average volume (in part because the run defense was average, but also because the pass defense was strong). But very conservatively, the defense is in the top seven. And, remember, unlike last year we played only six games against teams which trotted out back-up/not-good QB talent--Mac Jones; Zappe;. O'Connell, Taylor/DeVit;o, Ridder, Briisset/Howell So here's the plan: (1) resign Ashtyn Davis and Bryce Huff to three or four year deal and cut Mosely. The 11 million we save in '24 will pay for the combined '24 cap hit for Davis and Huff (assuming contracts for them with big signing bonuses and little salary in '24). (2) To fill in at LB, safety and DT, use no draft choices above the fifth round and sign minimum salary, or little more, FAs. (The biggest stumbling block to this happening is the "politics" of cutting CJ.) 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted January 10 Popular Post Share Posted January 10 They’re not cutting Mosley. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 9 minutes ago, SomebodytoAnybody47 said: They’re not cutting Mosley. I agree, but they sure as heck should. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 worst idea i ever heard of. there is a reason why guys like Devante Adams and Tyreik Hill become FAs. because they cost too much to keep that there teams dont want to put cheap FAs and 5th rd draft picks in key positions. face it Huff is gone. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, doitny said: worst idea i ever heard of. there is a reason why guys like Devante Adams and Tyreik Hill become FAs. because they cost too much to keep that there teams dont want to put cheap FAs and 5th rd draft picks in key positions. face it Huff is gone. When were Hill and Adams free agents? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 15 minutes ago, AFJF said: When were Hill and Adams free agents? your right, they were what , sign and trades?? because there teams couldnt afford them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirorob Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 They were both still under contract who immediately signed extensions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhg1084 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 1 hour ago, Alworth said: My question assumes that the defense is worth saving. Yes, there's a bit of padding in the Jets number 1 rank in yards per play and number three rank in yards per game because teams chose to run on us at an above average volume (in part because the run defense was average, but also because the pass defense was strong). But very conservatively, the defense is in the top seven. And, remember, unlike last year we played only six games against teams which trotted out back-up/not-good QB talent--Mac Jones; Zappe;. O'Connell, Taylor/DeVit;o, Ridder, Briisset/Howell So here's the plan: (1) resign Ashtyn Davis and Bryce Huff to three or four year deal and cut Mosely. The 11 million we save in '24 will pay for the combined '24 cap hit for Davis and Huff (assuming contracts for them with big signing bonuses and little salary in '24). (2) To fill in at LB, safety and DT, use no draft choices above the fifth round and sign minimum salary, or little more, FAs. (The biggest stumbling block to this happening is the "politics" of cutting CJ.) No chance they’re cutting Mosley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCJet Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 Can someone please explain to me why anyone would want Davante Adams? If he was a one year rental then maybe you give up a 3rd round pick for the opportunity to pay him $16million but hes not. The guy has $44 million cap hits in BOTH 2025 and 2026 when he will be 33 and 34 years old. That is absolutely horrendous. The only WRs who were on rosters at 33+ years old were Theilin, Marvin Jones and the fan favorite Randall Cobb. And we are going to sign up to have massive cap hits for someone that age? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 32 minutes ago, BCJet said: Can someone please explain to me why anyone would want Davante Adams? If he was a one year rental then maybe you give up a 3rd round pick for the opportunity to pay him $16million but hes not. The guy has $44 million cap hits in BOTH 2025 and 2026 when he will be 33 and 34 years old. That is absolutely horrendous. The only WRs who were on rosters at 33+ years old were Theilin, Marvin Jones and the fan favorite Randall Cobb. And we are going to sign up to have massive cap hits for someone that age? His cap hit is 14 and 25 the next two years. Prob the most you’d want him for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 1 hour ago, SomebodytoAnybody47 said: They’re not cutting Mosley. I’d like to hear @Sperm Edwards take on this 😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Maxman Posted January 10 Popular Post Share Posted January 10 They aren't cutting Mosley. He will be on the team next year. He is a leader. That defense stayed together two years in a row with no offense. CJ is a big part of the reason why. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jetsfan80 Posted January 10 Popular Post Share Posted January 10 Just now, Maxman said: They aren't cutting Mosley. He will be on the team next year. He is a leader. That defense stayed together two years in a row with no offense. CJ is a big part of the reason why. @Sperm Edwards get him 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 51 minutes ago, BCJet said: Can someone please explain to me why anyone would want Davante Adams? If he was a one year rental then maybe you give up a 3rd round pick for the opportunity to pay him $16million but hes not. The guy has $44 million cap hits in BOTH 2025 and 2026 when he will be 33 and 34 years old. That is absolutely horrendous. The only WRs who were on rosters at 33+ years old were Theilin, Marvin Jones and the fan favorite Randall Cobb. And we are going to sign up to have massive cap hits for someone that age? I don't think you have that right. I think he costs $!7M or so this year and $35 or so the next. I think the $44M counts the $8M per year in pro-rated signing bonus that the Raiders already paid him. His 2025 and 2026 numbers are not guaranteed either. Contracts keep going up and I think for 2024 he won't even cost as much as Christian Kirk or Diontae Johnson. The money is the reason be careful in trading for him, but it isn't necessarily a deal breaker. I'm pretty sure it will cost more to sign Mike Evans or Tee Higgins. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepy Lurker Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 1 minute ago, #27TheDominator said: I don't think you have that right. I think he costs $!7M or so this year and $35 or so the next. I think the $44M counts the $8M per year in pro-rated signing bonus that the Raiders already paid him. His 2025 and 2026 numbers are not guaranteed either. Contracts keep going up and I think for 2024 he won't even cost as much as Christian Kirk or Diontae Johnson. The money is the reason be careful in trading for him, but it isn't necessarily a deal breaker. I'm pretty sure it will cost more to sign Mike Evans or Tee Higgins. Oh sh*t! How much is that?!?! 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 They were both still under contract who immediately signed extensions.D Adams was traded and extended via ludicrous speed cashola ... Basically the same thing.Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealeb319 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 I'd love to keep Huff we need offensive line help and wr help though and we can't pay everyone shame we gave lazard so much that could have been a good chunk of huffs extension. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 For discipline and principle reasons the Jets cannot keep Mosley and Tomlinson for what they make. They should be offered reduced salaries to stay -more than another team would pay, but reduced. If they don’t agree they should be cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 11 hours ago, Maxman said: They aren't cutting Mosley. He will be on the team next year. He is a leader. That defense stayed together two years in a row with no offense. CJ is a big part of the reason why. Terrible take right here. Just terrible. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 14 hours ago, Alworth said: My question assumes that the defense is worth saving. Yes, there's a bit of padding in the Jets number 1 rank in yards per play and number three rank in yards per game because teams chose to run on us at an above average volume (in part because the run defense was average, but also because the pass defense was strong). But very conservatively, the defense is in the top seven. And, remember, unlike last year we played only six games against teams which trotted out back-up/not-good QB talent--Mac Jones; Zappe;. O'Connell, Taylor/DeVit;o, Ridder, Briisset/Howell So here's the plan: (1) resign Ashtyn Davis and Bryce Huff to three or four year deal and cut Mosely. The 11 million we save in '24 will pay for the combined '24 cap hit for Davis and Huff (assuming contracts for them with big signing bonuses and little salary in '24). (2) To fill in at LB, safety and DT, use no draft choices above the fifth round and sign minimum salary, or little more, FAs. (The biggest stumbling block to this happening is the "politics" of cutting CJ.) It'd not going to make me look good that you're agreeing with me on Mosley and then in the next breath drop the idea of paying Ashtyn Davis and Bryce Huff signing bonuses so big that - even with the smaller amortized (1/3 to 1/4, from your plan) SB hit in '24 - those bonuses are still large enough that the two of them eat up $11MM cleared from the '24 cap by cutting Mosley. Even more embarrassing is I initially read this as Bryce Hall. What are you trying to do to me? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alworth Posted January 10 Author Share Posted January 10 @Sperm Edwards. All I was trying to do was elicit constructive feedback from knowledgeable posters like you. And you didn't disappoint (see the upvote above). You agreed about CJ but found my plan to preserve the D to nevertheless not be disciplined enough. How would you proceed regarding the D--not signing Davis and Huff and also implementing my low-draft pick/low FA salary approach? doing something else.? I'm asking in order to to be educated by our cap guru; I'm not asking in hopes of winning debating points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymation Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 Has JN flipped their opinion on Ashtyn Davis that they want him now? If they do resign Davis, it will be a team friendly 2 years 6 million with the promise he will get the lion share of snaps at SS. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alworth Posted January 10 Author Share Posted January 10 I never bailed on Ashtyn Davis and think he's worth 3 years fourteen million. He's worked at improving and it shows both on D and specials. Thus, he wouldn't seem like someone that would go half-speed after getting his "bag". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymation Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 4 hours ago, Alworth said: I never bailed on Ashtyn Davis and think he's worth 3 years fourteen million. He's worked at improving and it shows both on D and specials. Thus, he wouldn't seem like someone that would go half-speed after getting his "bag". He is not worth that. He’s a special teams/part time player. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 23 hours ago, Alworth said: @Sperm Edwards. All I was trying to do was elicit constructive feedback from knowledgeable posters like you. And you didn't disappoint (see the upvote above). You agreed about CJ but found my plan to preserve the D to nevertheless not be disciplined enough. How would you proceed regarding the D--not signing Davis and Huff and also implementing my low-draft pick/low FA salary approach? doing something else.? I'm asking in order to to be educated by our cap guru; I'm not asking in hopes of winning debating points. I didn't get the notice here, but no worries, and ffs don't take anything I say seriously. Except that CJ Mosley should be cut. In all seriousness, I don't see how they're retaining Huff based on what little has been leaked. Specifically, this is about more than money for Huff: he wants to start, and Saleh/Ulbrich aren't going to start him. They're going to use him as a situational pass rusher because they see others as better-rounded ends, and what more he adds to the D being full time on unexpected pass plays he may take away on any number of 500 rushing plays. So the only way they retain him is either a - way outbid the best offer he gets, where it's so much more he'll put his ego away and take the best offer. So that's not outbidding by a million but upwards of $4-5MM/year. They're not doing that. b - tag him. They're not doing that either because, frankly, he's just not a $23MM/year player. No one's going to offer the Jets a draft pick (let alone a high one, at that) for a chance to have $23MM become the baseline amount for a multi-year deal with Huff. He'll probably sign somewhere else for about $15MM, and another double-digit sack season (for that new team) may be what awaits. Jets fans will say we should've just outbid that offer by $1MM, as though Huff would surely have taken that, but it's imaginary. He wants out. He wants to start. The Jets don't have that to offer him. And the franchise tag is just too much for a guy not 100% starting. It's a little like when they lost Morgan Moses to FA in some ways. It's not that they wouldn't offer Moses $5MM instead of other crap tackle depth at $2-3MM (and that ended up being $9MM when they signed Duane Brown after Becton went down again). It's that they wouldn't guarantee him the starting RT job in March, with Becton then out just 1 season, plus Fant coming off a far better season than Moses (and playing a more valuable position). Moses was fine in '21; people are misremembering that he played much better than that for the Jets, but there's a reason his top offer was for so little annually with just 1 season guaranteed. Unless they got in early on a Huff extension before the season began, the writing was on the wall with him leaving as soon as they drafted McDonald. I hope McDonald's all some hyped him up to be, because in Huff they're going to lose a serious and proven edge rusher. We'll see. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 I think they can be cap disciplined enough to cover their needs. The thing is saleh has got to realize that scoring 24+ points per game will help his defense. The biggest ticket will most likely be if they go after a guy like adams. His current contract is ridiculous and they’d have to give up picks. We don’t really know how they feel about their younger oline players like glaser, Newman, Warren and Mitchell. One or more could surprise and reduce the starter requirement from two to one. They are in good position to draft a good left tackle and can possibly get a decent guard. Alternatively they could draft a wr with the one pick and then go fishing for oline help. Fabini was a sixth rounder back in 98 and he wasn’t that bad. A lot of this depends on how good the coaches are at coaching. Carter has taken quite a bit of flak from Tyler Lewan and it was seconded by becton. But I saw an interview with lewan and he basically said Carter was mainly a hard azz and hurt players feelings, considering that the underachieving becton came out against the guy should be a positive. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alworth Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 Thanks, Sperm. You 've convinced me that it's unlikely that there will be a scenario in which Huff is affordable, not just in '24 but over the life of an accepted contract as a whole. My other musings about what to do about the D, especially because we agree about CJ, can wait for your response after the offseason unfolds more.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.