T0mShane Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Man, how different would Jets history be if Gettleman agrees to this trade? Broncos come up to 2 for Darnold, and the Jets are then forced to pick between Rosen and Allen at 3. As I remember it, Maccagnan preferred Rosen(?) Ultimately, it doesn’t make a difference because Allen would have busted huge here, but Rosen would have flamed out inside of two years and 2020 was the Burrow/Tua/Herbert draft (where we picked Becton). But if you’re a Giants fan hearing this, how tortured are you? They would have taken Josh Allen at five and could have, in the second round, drafted Nick Chubb, who went one pick after the Giants drafted Will Hernandez. Then in the third, they took BJ Hill one pick ahead of Fred Warner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jimmy 2 Times Posted January 27 Popular Post Share Posted January 27 But then we might not have Rodgers. 1 2 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Beerfish Posted January 27 Popular Post Share Posted January 27 The bigger botch was Douglas not sticking with Darnold for one more year and accepting a huge bounty for pick #2 from San Francisco instead of drafting Zach Wilson and then being ready to go hard for a QB the next year or so after the team was actually built instead of partially built. 19 4 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Asymmetrical Posted January 27 Popular Post Share Posted January 27 Gettleman dying on the Barkley hill is almost unbelievable. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jetsfan80 Posted January 27 Popular Post Share Posted January 27 3 minutes ago, Asymmetrical said: Gettleman dying on the Barkley hill is almost unbelievable. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimjasi Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 The obsession with Barkley was always bizarre to me never made sense to take a RB there 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peekskill68 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 29 minutes ago, Beerfish said: The bigger botch was Douglas not sticking with Darnold for one more year and accepting a huge bounty for pick #2 from San Francisco instead of drafting Zach Wilson and then being ready to go hard for a QB the next year or so after the team was actually built instead of partially built. Agree, but wasn't the issue related to Darnold's guaranteed money and picking up his 5th year option? I seem to recall Douglas was hyper focused on saving cap dollars and wanted to reset the QB clock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet2020 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 48 minutes ago, Jimmy 2 Times said: But then we might not have Rodgers. Yeah and no SB. So no thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alka Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 43 minutes ago, Beerfish said: The bigger botch was Douglas not sticking with Darnold for one more year and accepting a huge bounty for pick #2 from San Francisco instead of drafting Zach Wilson and then being ready to go hard for a QB the next year or so after the team was actually built instead of partially built. This is exactly what I was hoping for at the time. Our team would be looking a lot different right now, had we used that strategy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsplayer21 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 58 minutes ago, slimjasi said: The obsession with Barkley was always bizarre to me never made sense to take a RB there It’s not as bad as some of JDs picks lol.. Barkley has easily been their best player since coming in. On offense, by 100 miles. That doesn’t say much about the giants GMs decisions post Barkley. Their OL is just as bad as jets. Seems to be a theme in New York football, qbs and rbs getting hurt, behind a bad OL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 hour ago, peekskill68 said: Agree, but wasn't the issue related to Darnold's guaranteed money and picking up his 5th year option? I seem to recall Douglas was hyper focused on saving cap dollars and wanted to reset the QB clock. They could have just as easily traded darnold for the 2 and the 4 to carolina and brought in a vet for a year or so. Either or, keep darnold or traded him but the they could have got so much for that #2 pick and actually had a ready built team when they decided to draft their next QB. And Douglas has repeated the mistake by panicking with the Aaron rodgers move. The jets convinced themselves the team was built and all they need is a QB. The team is still not sufficiently bile to win. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 hour ago, Jimmy 2 Times said: But then we might not have Rodgers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 hour ago, slimjasi said: The obsession with Barkley was always bizarre to me never made sense to take a RB there Reminds me of the Bowers obsession. Barkley is better too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 9 minutes ago, Lupz27 said: Reminds me of the Bowers obsession. Barkley is better too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 I'd have to check but I believe some of the same journalists who criticized drafting Breece at the top of round 2 slobbered over the Barkley pick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 hour ago, Lupz27 said: Reminds me of the Bowers obsession. Barkley is better too. Ehhh nobody is locked in on taking Bowers in top 3 over a QB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 hour ago, SomebodytoAnybody47 said: Ehhh nobody is locked in on taking Bowers in top 3 over a QB Top 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 5 hours ago, T0mShane said: Man, how different would Jets history be if Gettleman agrees to this trade? Broncos come up to 2 for Darnold, and the Jets are then forced to pick between Rosen and Allen at 3. As I remember it, Maccagnan preferred Rosen(?) Ultimately, it doesn’t make a difference because Allen would have busted huge here, but Rosen would have flamed out inside of two years and 2020 was the Burrow/Tua/Herbert draft (where we picked Becton). But if you’re a Giants fan hearing this, how tortured are you? They would have taken Josh Allen at five and could have, in the second round, drafted Nick Chubb, who went one pick after the Giants drafted Will Hernandez. Then in the third, they took BJ Hill one pick ahead of Fred Warner. So the bottom line is Mac would still have made a bad choice if he picked Rosen. At least he wouldn’t have picked Barkley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 The three QBs he would have taken Darnold Mayfield Rosen 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 5 minutes ago, Larz said: The three QBs he would have taken Darnold Mayfield Rosen Wilson a few years later is Rosen level bad. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 18 minutes ago, BurnleyJet said: Wilson a few years later is Rosen level bad. No he isn't. Nowhere close. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 45 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: No he isn't. Nowhere close. Yes he is, the only difference is the Jets kept playing Wilson, Arizona and Miami was smart enough to bin him. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FootballLove Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Broncos still might get their wish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtina Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 7 hours ago, Asymmetrical said: Gettleman dying on the Barkley hill is almost unbelievable. Like Barkley wouldn’t have been there at 5? Plus extra picks???? Wow 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBJ Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 8 hours ago, T0mShane said: Man, how different would Jets history be if Gettleman agrees to this trade? Broncos come up to 2 for Darnold, and the Jets are then forced to pick between Rosen and Allen at 3. As I remember it, Maccagnan preferred Rosen(?) Ultimately, it doesn’t make a difference because Allen would have busted huge here, but Rosen would have flamed out inside of two years and 2020 was the Burrow/Tua/Herbert draft (where we picked Becton). But if you’re a Giants fan hearing this, how tortured are you? They would have taken Josh Allen at five and could have, in the second round, drafted Nick Chubb, who went one pick after the Giants drafted Will Hernandez. Then in the third, they took BJ Hill one pick ahead of Fred Warner. We would have got Rosen and then site would have got shutdown for antisemitism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadienJetsFan Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Revisionist history is fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawkeyeJet Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 “Cocked it up” is a very under utilized phrase 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Jets would have ended up with Rosen, not Allen. We all know it. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K_O_Brien Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 9 hours ago, Maxman said: Jets would have ended up with Rosen, not Allen. We all know it. We would, but i think Tom's point is Rosen would have flamed out quicker than Darnold, so we would drafted a QB in the 2020 draft (Burrow, Herbert, Tua) instead of 2021 (Wilson, Lance, Fields). Herbert is very good, he likely would have been good enough to overcome Gase in his rookie season. But the butterfly effect is we then, don't have Sauce, G Wilson, etc. Maybe we keep Gase another season, and we dip into the 2022 head coaching pool. Daboll or Pederson take over the reins. But knowing the Jets, we give the job to Nathaniel Hackett. Shudder. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 14 hours ago, Xtina said: Like Barkley wouldn’t have been there at 5? Plus extra picks???? Wow Browns would have taken Barkley at 4 if I'm not mistaken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 22 hours ago, Beerfish said: The bigger botch was Douglas not sticking with Darnold for one more year and accepting a huge bounty for pick #2 from San Francisco instead of drafting Zach Wilson and then being ready to go hard for a QB the next year or so after the team was actually built instead of partially built. As someone who was very, very pro-keep-Darnold-and-trade-down at the time, it was a reasonable plan to draft Zach or Fields at 2 because 1. The next year’s QB crop was the miserable Kenny Pickett class and 2. No GM should ever think they’ll get a shot at picking inside the top five twice in their tenure without getting fired for it. Douglas was in the right to take his shot at a QB there 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 11 minutes ago, T0mShane said: As someone who was very, very pro-keep-Darnold-and-trade-down at the time, it was a reasonable plan to draft Zach or Fields at 2 because 1. The next year’s QB crop was the miserable Kenny Pickett class and 2. No GM should ever think they’ll get a shot at picking inside the top five twice in their tenure without getting fired for it. Douglas was in the right to take his shot at a QB there We have word on Zach’s whereabouts. He’s grinding film in Bora Bora. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 22 minutes ago, Matt39 said: We have word on Zach’s whereabouts. He’s grinding film in Bora Bora. Connor Hughes, Cimini, Rosenblatt: HI GUYS TAKING QUESTIONS FOR THE NEXT MAILBAG. ASK ME ANYTHING Fan: Hey, what happened to Zach Wilson? Haven’t heard from him since he disappeared into the blue medical tent in Miami. CH/RC/ZR: WHICH FREE AGENT TACKLES SHOULD THE JETS TARGET? I AM GLAD YOU ASKED! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Thornburgh Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 16 hours ago, BurnleyJet said: Yes he is, the only difference is the Jets kept playing Wilson, Arizona and Miami was smart enough to bin him. It is wierd how similar Zach and Josh Rosen are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.