Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 send them pick 10 and call it a day 4 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Author Popular Post Share Posted February 25 LeSauce is on top of this one 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wit Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 I mean, I would rather send the next years first and a third. He’s not tyreek but he’s on that level. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app 1 5 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wit Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Triple post but might as well make use.If they don’t fix their o line with a topTackle this year they won’t have a chance no matter who the QB is or who he’s throwing to. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wit Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Ooooh the hill trade happened in march too!Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRy56 Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 This is without a question a move the Jets should be in on. Young, elite, and he has the swagger for NY. Structure his guarantees where he’s cuttable as Garrett Wilson’s rookie deal comes up for extension 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Author Popular Post Share Posted February 25 with Breece coming out of backfield 5 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Doggin94it Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 Anyone who thinks he's going for less than 2 firsts is out of their minds 14 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 I think we also need to ask why the Vikings would trade a guy of this caliber. I would have to assume it's because he's a diva/head-case type. 1 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 5 minutes ago, Doggin94it said: Anyone who thinks he's going for less than 2 firsts is out of their minds I don’t think a WR has ever netted two 1s. Especially considering the team trading for his has to give him a record setting contract. When the Vikings traded Moss to the Raiders I believe it was just for one first rd pick. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 2 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: I think we also need to ask why the Vikings would trade a guy of this caliber. I would have to assume it's because he's a diva/head-case type. No, if they are making that movie it is primarily because the team is nowhere near good enough to compete over the next 3 years, because Kirk Cousins is a quarterback with a hard ceiling and they are locked into mediocrity. So they're going to tear it down gather assets and try to rebuild. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post derp Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 1 minute ago, Rhg1084 said: I don’t think a WR has ever netted two 1s. Especially considering the team trading for his has to give him a record setting contract. When the Vikings traded Moss to the Raiders I believe it was just for one first rd pick. The Jets have been a part of trade in which a WR netted two #1’s. 10 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Lith Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 3 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: I think we also need to ask why the Vikings would trade a guy of this caliber. I would have to assume it's because he's a diva/head-case type. They might want to acquire draft capital to move up for a QB in the draft. Obtain a 1 for Jefferson and then package it with 11 to go get a QB. Or they just might be concerned that he is looking for 5 years, $150M plus. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guilhermezmc Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 19 minutes ago, Wit said: I mean, I would rather send the next years first and a third. He’s not tyreek but he’s on that level. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app I would send 3 firsts for him he's that good 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Harris Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 2 minutes ago, derp said: The Jets have been a part of trade in which a WR netted two #1’s. Keyshawn to the Bucs granting us a total of 4 first round picks that year Sean ellis Abraham pennington Becht 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 9 minutes ago, Lith said: They might want to acquire draft capital to move up for a QB in the draft. Obtain a 1 for Jefferson and then package it with 11 to go get a QB. Or they just might be concerned that he is looking for 5 years, $150M plus. Actually, that would be very reasonable. A FQB is way more important than a great WR. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jimmy 2 Times Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 They traded Diggs for a pick that was used on Jefferson and got the better of the deal. Now they're looking to do the same thing again. Stay at ten and take Nabers. 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 28 minutes ago, Doggin94it said: Anyone who thinks he's going for less than 2 firsts is out of their minds Should be 4 if Jamal got 2, so basically half price, get it done Joey!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mogglez Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Barry McCockinner Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 51 minutes ago, Wit said: I mean, I would rather send the next years first and a third. He’s not tyreek but he’s on that level. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app He's better than Tyreek. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS17 Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 [X] Doubt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Lith Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 1 minute ago, Barry McCockinner said: He's better than Tyreek. And 5 years younger. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPitch Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 So what’s the deal with this contract? We lose 10 for one year rental no thanks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 I mean he’s on pace to be one of the GOATs. If he’s truly available JD gotta do anything he can to get him. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 42 minutes ago, Rhg1084 said: I don’t think a WR has ever netted two 1s. Especially considering the team trading for his has to give him a record setting contract. When the Vikings traded Moss to the Raiders I believe it was just for one first rd pick. When has a WR as young and as good as JJ ever been traded? Candidly the guy is a headcase. Not sure he’s worth the hassle. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Author Popular Post Share Posted February 25 1 minute ago, UntouchableCrew said: When has a WR as young and as good as JJ ever been traded? Candidly the guy is a headcase. Not sure he’s worth the hassle. The best WR in the league is not worth the hassle? lol ok… and he’s a head case? I’ve never seen anything saying that, where’d you get that from? 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 More nonsense, I'd be shocked if Minny was that dumb, except....if they suddenly think they are smarter than every one and becasue they traded diggs and it worked out it will work out again. Sam Howell throwing to Jefferson and Garret wilson will be a thing to behold! (After rodgers gets hurt .) 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 LFG 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drums Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Would they be interested in Huff? Id send Huff and next year’s first for JJ. They can take Zach too if they want. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 19 minutes ago, Rhg1084 said: The best WR in the league is not worth the hassle? lol ok… and he’s a head case? I’ve never seen anything saying that, where’d you get that from? One of either JJ or GW is going to complain about targets, but if anyone can keep the peace… it’s Rodgers. 22 minutes ago, UntouchableCrew said: When has a WR as young and as good as JJ ever been traded? Candidly the guy is a headcase. Not sure he’s worth the hassle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhg1084 Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 1 hour ago, derp said: The Jets have been a part of trade in which a WR netted two #1’s. Plus a Box Safety who went for two firsts and a 3rd. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
83Kelly2Allen18 Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Wrs are always available, even really good ones. Its overrated and not truly fundamental to winning at a high level consistently The draft is insanely deep at wr and we can get out future QB. Were actually sitting in a nice spot. Stay away from this 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Barry McCockinner Posted February 25 Popular Post Share Posted February 25 9 minutes ago, 83Kelly2Allen18 said: Wrs are always available, even really good ones. Its overrated and not truly fundamental to winning at a high level consistently The draft is insanely deep at wr and we can get out future QB. Were actually sitting in a nice spot. Stay away from this Just a heads up, you are posting from you buffalo bills fan account. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.