Jump to content

Breer article on Saleh


Recommended Posts

Just now, Matt39 said:

I mean as a collective. The organizational decision to carry Wilson as the two and then not move off of him was a self inflicted move. There’s no adversity to overcome when you create the problem in which everyone on the outside knew was obvious.

You can't try to overcome the adversity of your own mistakes? If you accidentally cut yourself with your table saw, should you just sit there and watch yourself bleed out? 😅

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bicketybam said:

You can't try to overcome the adversity of your own mistakes? If you accidentally cut yourself with your table saw, should you just sit there and watch yourself bleed out? 😅

That’s more or less what the Jets did with letting Wilson sabotage this season. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Post of the Week 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

That’s more or less what the Jets did with letting Wilson sabotage this season. 

The Jets/Douglas took a massive gamble that Rodgers would stay healthy and Wilson would not have to start any meaningful games. 8 of Rodgers' previous 9 seasons he started every game. But as Jets luck would have it, he suffered a freak achilles tear 4 snaps into the season. Massive gamble lost. At that point I don't see who they could have signed that would have saved their season. If you want to make a case that they could have signed player X and made the playoffs, fine, but they weren't achieving their ultimate goal and their draft position would have been even worse. Maybe the mistake was not letting Wilson start every game? Or starting Boyle in week 2 and for the rest of the year. But that would be a hard sell to the other guys on the team, especially a guy like G. Wilson.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

Playing a quarterback who can’t play, however, was. 

Doesn’t change the fact that everything would have been different if Rodgers Achilles wasn’t ready to snap and did.  

Even if they should have had someone else in place, isnt the point that adversity makes you stronger?  Not an excuse to point fingers and blame.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jet Nut said:

Doesn’t change the fact that everything would have been different if Rodgers Achilles wasn’t ready to snap and did.  

Even if they should have had someone else in place, isnt the point that adversity makes you stronger?  Not an excuse to point fingers and blame.

 

Did last season make the Jets stronger by immediately punting it after Rodgers went down?  They didn’t even try to figure out QB.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

Did last season make the Jets stronger by immediately punting it after Rodgers went down?  They didn’t even try to figure out QB.

No.

Has nothing to do with his point, the players will be stronger for it.  
Is it that hard?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rbstern said:

The gamble was the o-line.  That's the controllable part that blew up.  Z.Wilson probably could have gotten them to 9, maybe 10 wins with solid o-line play.  A better backup QB wouldn't have helped much with how the o-line panned out.  A healthy Aaron Rodgers, behind that o-line, wouldn't have lasted a meaningful portion of the season.

The moves this offseason are an acknowledgement of last year's o-line meltdown.

The oline will always be a cop out excuse for those that can’t admit that Wilson had no business being on the field. And the Jets knew it but still felt it was ok to punt the season and gaslight into pretending they weren’t. If anything garbage ass Simein should have been playing by week 4, because at least he was professionally functional.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mogglez said:

They could have been even stronger if we had a capable QB2 and made the playoffs last year.

Yeah. I don’t see how anyone got stronger last year when everyone knew Zach could not play at all. It was all bullsh*t. You’re not selling me on they thought Zach could compete.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

I mean as a collective. The organizational decision to carry Wilson as the two and then not move off of him was a self inflicted move. There’s no adversity to overcome when you create the problem in which everyone on the outside knew was obvious. For once, this regime could stop the gaslighting and admit they messed up. 

Woody Johnson, baby

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

Did last season make the Jets stronger by immediately punting it after Rodgers went down?  They didn’t even try to figure out QB.

Starting Wilson made it abundantly apparent that he was never going to get it and they traded him in the off-season. If he was QB3 he would probably still be in the team.....like you kept predicting and were comically wrong about.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, slats said:

This is the great mystery. However, we can probably quite safely remove Saleh as the culprit in keeping Zach not only on the roster but on the field. We don’t know if there was a directive from the top, or if Rodgers’ fantasy of returning to the field last year impaired their collective judgement, but Saleh never seemed to even want Zach. Internally, the team may have a better idea of what that “adversity” was than we do. 

Fair way of looking at it. In that case, it would make more sense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matt39 said:

The oline will always be a cop out excuse for those that can’t admit that Wilson had no business being on the field. And the Jets knew it but still felt it was ok to punt the season and gaslight into pretending they weren’t. If anything garbage ass Simein should have been playing by week 4, because at least he was professionally functional.

He had a worse passer rating than Wilson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rbstern said:

The gamble was the o-line.  That's the controllable part that blew up.  Z.Wilson probably could have gotten them to 9, maybe 10 wins with solid o-line play.  A better backup QB wouldn't have helped much with how the o-line panned out.  A healthy Aaron Rodgers, behind that o-line, wouldn't have lasted a meaningful portion of the season.

The moves this offseason are an acknowledgement of last year's o-line meltdown.

If you watched the tape, the o-line played one of it’s best games in week 3, but got mauled in the stats department because Wilson refused to play fast and get rid of the ball on time.  The o-line, throughout the whole season, was not great…but the QB play dragged them down to a substantially worse level.  Trevor Siemian wasn’t fantastic, but he was leagues better than Wilson or Boyle pre-snap and it shouldn’t be a surprise that some of the OLs best games came with him under center.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The resilience that shone through in a 3–1 October, after Aaron Rodgers went down, was wearing thin. The New York Jets’ injuries were mounting and, at 4–7, any idea of going to the playoffs behind Zach Wilson, Tim Boyle, Trevor Siemian or whomever else they’d roll out there at quarterback was quickly slipping away.

Something needed to change.

So the coaches dug in on their offense, one that averaged just nine points per game through the Jets’ winless November, with the final straw being a 34–13 Black Friday loss to the Miami Dolphins, one in which the team’s only points in the first 55 minutes came on a pick-six, and New York rushed for a grand total of 29 yards.

“We went into last offseason, first year in the new offense, first year with a Hall of Fame quarterback, and we installed an offense designed for 17 games worth of Aaron Rodgers,” Jets coach Robert Saleh said Saturday, the first day of his summer break. “When he got hurt, we still wanted to maintain what we installed. Maybe it wasn’t as much as Aaron would have done. But we wanted to keep the same philosophy of what we’re trying to get done.

“As the year went on, and injuries started to pile up, we realized that there needed to be a shift in philosophy.”

Saleh, coordinator Nathaniel Hackett and the offensive coaches didn’t reinvent the wheel with the mini-bye they got from playing early on Thanksgiving weekend. In fact, they went the other way altogether.

Instead of doing more, as having Rodgers would have allowed, the Jets committed to doing less. The coaches found that through playing the hand they were dealt at quarterback, and the injuries they endured at offensive line, there wasn’t enough they’d found a way to get truly good at as the season wore on. So the idea was to find those things, do them more regularly and see where the chips might fall from there.

The success of that plan was modest. But, eventually, it did come. The Jets won three of their final five games. After failing to hit 100 yards rushing eight times in a nine-game stretch, they hit that mark in each of the last three weeks of the season—going for 164, 107 and 185 in their 15th, 16th, and 17th games, respectively.

Overall, they tried to find what would be the main thing—and keep it the main thing.

And while it wasn’t their intention back then, they laid the foundation for what was to come in the 2024 offseason and, if things work out as planned, beyond.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

An interesting thought is this: Saleh isn’t even a factor in how well the Jets do this season. He runs the defense, which Ulbrich can do just as well at this point. If Saleh quit in January and they elevated Ulbrich, are the Jets any worse off today? 

Come on this is an absurd take. Who is gonna lead the stair run challenges. Let’s focus on the big picture here and not lose our heads.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rbstern said:

The gamble was the o-line.  That's the controllable part that blew up.  Z.Wilson probably could have gotten them to 9, maybe 10 wins with solid o-line play.  A better backup QB wouldn't have helped much with how the o-line panned out.  A healthy Aaron Rodgers, behind that o-line, wouldn't have lasted a meaningful portion of the season.

The moves this offseason are an acknowledgement of last year's o-line meltdown.

This!  ZW took the brunt of the blame but it was very obvious how awful the rest of the offense was by the moves JD made this offseason.  Though you're leaving out how awful the WRs were (and JD acquired Mike Williams and drafted Malachai Corley).

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

An interesting thought is this: Saleh isn’t even a factor in how well the Jets do this season. He runs the defense, which Ulbrich can do just as well at this point. If Saleh quit in January and they elevated Ulbrich, are the Jets any worse off today? 

You seriously might not be wrong on this.  I think Ulbrich runs the defense anyway.  And AR8 runs the offense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

An interesting thought is this: Saleh isn’t even a factor in how well the Jets do this season. He runs the defense, which Ulbrich can do just as well at this point. If Saleh quit in January and they elevated Ulbrich, are the Jets any worse off today? 

Saleh was a TE in college.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bicketybam said:

The Jets/Douglas took a massive gamble that Rodgers would stay healthy and Wilson would not have to start any meaningful games. 8 of Rodgers' previous 9 seasons he started every game. But as Jets luck would have it, he suffered a freak achilles tear 4 snaps into the season. Massive gamble lost. At that point I don't see who they could have signed that would have saved their season. If you want to make a case that they could have signed player X and made the playoffs, fine, but they weren't achieving their ultimate goal and their draft position would have been even worse. Maybe the mistake was not letting Wilson start every game? Or starting Boyle in week 2 and for the rest of the year. But that would be a hard sell to the other guys on the team, especially a guy like G. Wilson.

Good point but they also had siemien for five weeks before they finally put him in.  If he went in prior to Boyle maybe another one or two wins.  I don’t see how they can excuse their record in the second half.  Blame Zach?  Okay but he still managed six wins and had a good game against the Texans.  I don’t believe saleh was capable of pulling the team together.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rangerous said:

Good point but they also had siemien for five weeks before they finally put him in.  If he went in prior to Boyle maybe another one or two wins.  I don’t see how they can excuse their record in the second half.  Blame Zach?  Okay but he still managed six wins and had a good game against the Texans.  I don’t believe saleh was capable of pulling the team together.

They won 3 out of their last 5 with Wilson and Siemian at QB. 

Another win or two does nothing but lower their draft position. It wouldn't have been good enough to make the playoffs. Winning 7 games with the final roster Saleh had was miraculous in my book. The QB room had a 70.5 passer rating. That's abysmal!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...