Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JonEJet

Beckett = Ace

Recommended Posts

I promise you, nothing will make you look smart.

Ever.

Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away.

Yet you've been proved completely wrong on Beckett. Now the sample size must be extended until you somehow feel you are correct because you are too small to man up and admit that the guy is pressure game money in the bank.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away.

Just like you were right about Welker? You're a running joke on the board.

Keep up the good work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

madmike, beckett is one of the top 5 playoff pitchers of this generation

mariano rivera

john smoltz

curt schilling

orlando hernandez

josh beckett

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yet you've been proved completely wrong on Beckett. Now the sample size must be extended until you somehow feel you are correct because you are too small to man up and admit that the guy is pressure game money in the bank.

If this was a yankee pitcher coming off of a career year after a mediocre career i doubt all the met/sox fans on this board would be lapping him to this extent...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just like you were right about Welker? You're a running joke on the board.

Keep up the good work.

I was right about Welker, I have no problem being a joke to a troll like you,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was right about Welker, I have no problem being a joke to a troll like you,

madmike, what are you trying to win here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was right about Welker, I have no problem being a joke to a troll like you,

You were right about Welker? Can you please explain to me how you came to this conclusion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You were right about Welker? Can you please explain to me how you came to this conclusion?

Welker is nowhere near worth what your cheating franchise paid for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Welker is nowhere near worth what your cheating franchise paid for him.

So you've changed your tune? I thought you said he sucked and now you are saying he is overpaid?

His 38 receptions for 386 yards and 3TD's tell me he is earning his paycheck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So you've changed your tune? I thought you said he sucked and now you are saying he is overpaid?

His 38 receptions for 386 yards and 3TD's tell me he is earning his paycheck.

I never said anything different from that. This is the BASEBALL forum. I'll be talking baseball here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I never said anything different from that. This is the BASEBALL forum. I'll be talking baseball here.

So you are only right in the baseball forum? Is that what you were trying to say with this statement:

Originally Posted by madmike1

Except when i'm right over and over but maybe if you ignore that it'll just go away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So you are only right in the baseball forum? Is that what you were trying to say with this statement:
Actually i'm right most of the time but trolls like you will never see that reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually i'm right most of the time but trolls like you will never see that reality.

I maybe a troll according to you but there are plenty of Yankees, Mets & Jets fans here who agree with me.

If you actually admitted when you were wrong people might stop making fun of you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I maybe a troll according to you but there are plenty of Yankees, Mets & Jets fans here who agree with me.

If you actually admitted when you were wrong people might stop making fun of you.

I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless.

I'm clueless?

You said that Beckett is a 3rd starter. That's comedy gold right there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm clueless?

You said that Beckett is a 3rd starter. That's comedy gold right there.

What I said was that BEFORE THIS SEASON his CAREER numbers were at that level. Sorry if you as a boston homer can't see that reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What I said was that BEFORE THIS SEASON his CAREER numbers were at that level. Sorry if you as a boston homer can't see that reality.

Somer people actually watch baseball, rather than just look at numbers.

That is one of a plethora of your problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What I said was that BEFORE THIS SEASON his CAREER numbers were at that level. Sorry if you as a boston homer can't see that reality.

And, BTW, looking at Philip Hughes' NUMBERS say that he will be a midle of a rotation guy, rather than a HOF type that you indicated he is.

Just reading the numbers ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless.

I thought you were never ever ever ever gonna come back into this evil baseball forum that's occupied by Scott Dierking?

What happened? :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And, BTW, looking at Philip Hughes' NUMBERS say that he will be a midle of a rotation guy, rather than a HOF type that you indicated he is.

Just reading the numbers ;)

Didn't you see that Hughes has had over 300 innings in the minors? Thats a huge sample size. :bwahaharoll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could give a crap if you make fun of me. You are clueless.

you claim to be a numbers guy and dismiss Beckett in the playoffs??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought you were never ever ever ever gonna come back into this evil baseball forum that's occupied by Scott Dierking?

What happened? :confused:

I put my stalker on ignore. Not that he was the reason I left anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you claim to be a numbers guy and dismiss Beckett in the playoffs??

His numbers over his career mean much more than 8 starts. And that goes for any player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I put my stalker on ignore. Not that he was the reason I left anyway.

Translation-Madmike can't have a normal discussion with people without resorting to name calling and lashing out.

The putting on ignore is a knee jerk reaction to having to lsiten to someone elses opionions, who just not might jive with Mike's. That is a foreign concept to him.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
His numbers over his career mean much more than 8 starts. And that goes for any player.

and those numbers still indicate that he's a solid pitcher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and those numbers still indicate that he's a solid pitcher

He's been great in the playoffs but there is no circumstance where i would value 8 starts over a player's career numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He's been great in the playoffs but there is no circumstance where i would value 8 starts over a player's career numbers.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/b/beckejo02.shtml

his ERA is 16 points above the league average, .597 winning %, three straight years with 15 wins or more

he's not dominant. he'll never be Roger, Randy, Pedro or Greg but he's damn good and wins twice as many games with the Sox than he loses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.baseball-reference.com/b/beckejo02.shtml

his ERA is 16 points above the league average, .597 winning %, three straight years with 15 wins or more

he's not dominant. he'll never be Roger, Randy, Pedro or Greg but he's damn good and wins twice as many games with the Sox than he loses.

a 116 ERA+ is around a no 3 starter...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
His numbers over his career mean much more than 8 starts. And that goes for any player.

He had a bad year in 2006. As you talk so much about his numbers I suggest you take a look at the link blackout provided in his post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a 116 ERA+ is around a no 3 starter...

so Nolan Ryan was a career #3 starter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a 116 ERA+ is around a no 3 starter...

Do you even watch the games?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He had a bad year in 2006. As you talk so much about his numbers I suggest you take a look at the link blackout provided in his post.

I've seen his numbers. I wouldn't talk about a player if i didn't take a look at their numbers. His numbers before last season were just ok. Not great not awful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...