SoFlaJets Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 RNK NAME ....ATT YDS AVG YPG LNG TD FUM LST 1 Atlanta.......219 1333 6.1 222.2 90 5 10 2 2 NY Giants... 182 914 5.0 152.3 29 3 8 3 3 Washington. 196 899 4.6 128.4 35 7 10 3 4 San Diego....209 888 4.2 148.0 73 9 6 2 5 Philadelphia..169 877 5.2 125.3 71 8 9 7 6 Denver........191 860 4.5 143.3 39 3 4 3 7 Dallas..........191 828 4.3 138.0 33 9 5 3 8 NY Jets.......222 808 3.6 115.4 23 8 7 4 9 New England.203 789 3.9 131.5 41 7 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 RNK NAME ....ATT YDS AVG YPG LNG TD FUM LST 1 Atlanta.......219 1333 6.1 222.2 90 5 10 2 2 NY Giants... 182 914 5.0 152.3 29 3 8 3 3 Washington. 196 899 4.6 128.4 35 7 10 3 4 San Diego....209 888 4.2 148.0 73 9 6 2 5 Philadelphia..169 877 5.2 125.3 71 8 9 7 6 Denver........191 860 4.5 143.3 39 3 4 3 7 Dallas..........191 828 4.3 138.0 33 9 5 3 8 NY Jets.......222 808 3.6 115.4 23 8 7 4 9 New England.203 789 3.9 131.5 41 7 5 2 What is your point? That you have managed a whole 19 yards in one more game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 What is your point? That you have managed a whole 19 yards in one more game? draw your own conclusions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjets Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 What is your point? That you have managed a whole 19 yards in one more game? would you give it up dumbass.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 What is your point? That you have managed a whole 19 yards in one more game?I think his point is that at the start of the season all you pasties fans were saying we had no run game and now we are in the TOP 10 Sucka!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 would you give it up dumbass.... Jackass when the point is you have a better rushing attack.....the only thing that can be drawn from that post. You might want to factor in the one more game and look at the average. I could be wrong, but 131 > 115. You need to give it up. Crack? Or senseless posts on a MB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Considering we started: 2.5 games with a backup LG, two rookies at LT and C and Clement & Moore; plus a couple games with Blaylock/Barlow getting all the carries... the difference should be far greater with NE's superior OL, more experienced OC, far better defense, and Dillon/Maroney, plus Brady to keep the defenses more honest than us with Chad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 Jackass when the point is you have a better rushing attack.....the only thing that can be drawn from that post. You might want to factor in the one more game and look at the average. I could be wrong, but 131 > 115. You need to give it up. Crack? Or senseless posts on a MB. or maybe...you can go over to a Pats board and discuss YOUR great running attack with some Pats fans if you don't approve of what's being posted on a JETS SITE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Two can play this game... Rushing Offense - Rushing Yards/Game Team G Att Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TDs FDs 20+ Atlanta 6 219 36.5 1333 6.1 222.2 5 60 13 New York (N) 6 182 30.3 914 5.0 152.3 3 51 4 San Diego 6 209 34.8 888 4.2 148.0 9 48 6 Denver 6 191 31.8 860 4.5 143.3 3 42 5 Dallas 6 191 31.8 828 4.3 138.0 9 45 6 New England 6 203 33.8 789 3.9 131.5 7 47 5 Washington 7 196 28.0 899 4.6 128.4 7 50 5 Philadelphia 7 169 24.1 877 5.2 125.3 8 45 6 San Francisco 6 156 26.0 703 4.5 117.2 5 35 7 Oakland 6 160 26.7 696 4.4 116.0 2 29 2 Minnesota 6 167 27.8 696 4.2 116.0 2 23 4 Jacksonville 6 182 30.3 694 3.8 115.7 7 38 3 New York (A) 7 222 31.7 808 3.6 115.4 8 47 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Considering we started: 2.5 games with a backup LG, two rookies at LT and C and Clement & Moore; plus a couple games with Blaylock/Barlow getting all the carries... the difference should be far greater with NE's superior OL, more experienced OC, far better defense, and Dillon/Maroney, plus Brady to keep the defenses more honest than us with Chad. You had me until you said that. Doesn't Schott have more then 1 year OC experience? Those are good points. The Jets running game has exceeded expectations, but look at who you have run against: 13 (Phins), 17th (Lions), 12th (Jax), 31st (Colts), 19th (Bills), 6th (Pats) and 32nd (Titans) This is similar to BZ saying the Phins are a top D last week. Plus, your average is a little inflated after trampling the Lions for 221 last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Considering we started: 2.5 games with a backup LG, two rookies at LT and C and Clement & Moore; plus a couple games with Blaylock/Barlow getting all the carries... the difference should be far greater with NE's superior OL, more experienced OC, far better defense, and Dillon/Maroney, plus Brady to keep the defenses more honest than us with Chad. Get it straight. For starters, there isn't a single player on the Patriots roster that is above average. Second, Chad is better than Brady. There are no excuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 You had me until you said that. Doesn't Schott have more then 1 year OC experience? Those are good points. The Jets running game has exceeded expectations, but look at who you have run against: 13 (Phins), 17th (Lions), 12th (Jax), 31st (Colts), 19th (Bills), 6th (Pats) and 32nd (Titans) This is similar to BZ saying the Phins are a top D last week. Plus, your average is a little inflated after trampling the Lions for 221 last week. Then I indeed have you. Schott was a QB coach until this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Two can play this game... Rushing Offense - Rushing Yards/Game Team G Att Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TDs FDs 20+ Atlanta 6 219 36.5 1333 6.1 222.2 5 60 13 New York (N) 6 182 30.3 914 5.0 152.3 3 51 4 San Diego 6 209 34.8 888 4.2 148.0 9 48 6 Denver 6 191 31.8 860 4.5 143.3 3 42 5 Dallas 6 191 31.8 828 4.3 138.0 9 45 6 New England 6 203 33.8 789 3.9 131.5 7 47 5 Washington 7 196 28.0 899 4.6 128.4 7 50 5 Philadelphia 7 169 24.1 877 5.2 125.3 8 45 6 San Francisco 6 156 26.0 703 4.5 117.2 5 35 7 Oakland 6 160 26.7 696 4.4 116.0 2 29 2 Minnesota 6 167 27.8 696 4.2 116.0 2 23 4 Jacksonville 6 182 30.3 694 3.8 115.7 7 38 3 New York (A) 7 222 31.7 808 3.6 115.4 8 47 1 alk, I spoke with max, he said you can't play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 The important thing in my mind is that we are improving in running the ball the last couple of weeks-the offensive line is doing a better job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 The important thing in my mind is that we are improving in running the ball the last couple of weeks-the offensive line is doing a better job people said I was crazy when I pointed out during the Jax game thread that the Jets were working on the run scheme blocking-but after reading a couple of articles from yesterday it seems that's exactly what they were doing.What a concept...take a brutal loss and make something good out of it-WHILE THE GAME IS STILL GOING.Bet ya Herm never thought of that kind of stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verde Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Then I indeed have you. Schott was a QB coach until this year. *Patiently waiting for PFSIKH's retort* tick, tick, tick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Considering we started: 2.5 games with a backup LG, two rookies at LT and C and Clement & Moore; plus a couple games with Blaylock/Barlow getting all the carries... the difference should be far greater with NE's superior OL, more experienced OC, far better defense, and Dillon/Maroney, plus Brady to keep the defenses more honest than us with Chad. How many of those rushing yards came in garbage time against the Jags? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 *Patiently waiting for PFSIKH's retort* tick, tick, tick... Sorry, had some Yes Dear things to do. Point taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 I'm more concerned about the 3.6 per carry. If I were a Pats fan I wouldn't be too happy with 3.9 ypc. Then again, if I were a Pats fan I wouldn't be too happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 I still love the fact that all these pats fans are really closet jet fans. They have so many posts. Makes you wonder. :bag: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 I'm more concerned about the 3.6 per carry. If I were a Pats fan I wouldn't be too happy with 3.9 ypc. Then again, if I were a Pats fan I wouldn't be too happy. 1 That is the amount of times the Patriots have averaged 4.0 or over since 1985. Plus, 3.9 is inflated. Brady ripped off like a 22 yard run against the Bengals. I am fine with 3.9. I would be more concerend if they were coming up short on 3rd and 1, 2 and 3s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 1 That is the amount of times the Patriots have averaged 4.0 or over since 1985. Plus, 3.9 is inflated. Brady ripped off like a 22 yard run against the Bengals. I am fine with 3.9. I would be more concerend if they were coming up short on 3rd and 1, 2 and 3s. Yeah, but you only had Corey Dillon two years and he was hurt most of '05. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Yeah, but you only had Corey Dillon two years and he was hurt most of '05. Yeah, but we had Curtis Martin for 3 seasons and Robert Edwards for another. They also played for decent teams. You would think the law of averages would catch up sometime. 1 in 21 years? 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Yeah, but we had Curtis Martin for 3 seasons and Robert Edwards for another. They also played for decent teams. You would think the law of averages would catch up sometime. 1 in 21 years? 1. Better hope it's still all that running when in front to kill the clock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.