Elon Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Let me join the chorus of those saying the Jets sucked today...but if this isn't reviewable...why have the rule: (Pictures Courtesy of JI.Com) CATCHING THE BALL HE NOW HAS THE BALL (RIGHT BEFORE HE GETS HIT) LOOK HOW MUCH GODDAMN ROOM HE HAS!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 We were robbed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Wow. ****ing wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.S. Dylan Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 not a ref in sight. that should have been a reviewable play wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 We were robbed. Definitely robbed on that call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Jet Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Complete BS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Good pics for whoever got those. Bullsh#t pussy azz phucking homefield call. This has happened too many times to the Jets this year and I am sick and tired of our teams being doormats for sh#tty nfl refs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetophile Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 "By rule, let's play kill the refs. Dead by contact." In all seriousness, winning outright is more pressing than ever. I understand the ruling, but if that wasn't a knockout, then I'm Marvin Hagler. Or at least Leon Spinks. It should have been called a TD. Baker was booking up the sideline a good two feet in bounds before he was knocked out in midair. Bad rulings preclude any chance you have to stay in it, whether or not you "deserve" to win based on game long cr*ppy play or not. Because we were outplayed means a bad call should take the game away from us? Utter garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsMan57 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 And you have this complete imbecile, Giants fan, Jet hating Adam Schein go on the Jet postgame and say that it was the right call because the head official hsa a great crew. O so they dont make mistakes you @--hole? StevIE Wonder could see that was a TD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 StevIE Wonder could see that was a TD. So could I That was a touchdown, georgia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 What's the point of havinga replay rule at all if they make a mess on a call like that? Have these guys and gals work instead- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shutout Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 the 2nd pic wasn't showing up in the 1st post,so here it is...makes it even clearer it was a TD in my opinion and now its not showing up in this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strange_andy Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 And yet in the Cowboys/Panthers game there were 2 official reviews at the end of the game, not sure why this was never was even considered by the refs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetophile Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 And yet in the Cowboys/Panthers game there were 2 official reviews at the end of the game, not sure why this was never was even considered by the refs. It was not called a TD. Therefore, no review. Not reviewing isn't in question, it's the NON-CALL of a TD. But they got around it by saying there was no way of knowing if he would have come down inbounds, so therefore, no TD, not reviewable. That's why Mangini said, well, look at it. Not because it would be reviewed and overturned. But "look at it", as in you guys are blind and stupid. We got outplayed, but we also got scr*wed. Anyone who thinks Watermelon Haid to (insert Colts receiver of choice HERE) would not have had that called a TD is nutsy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 And yet in the Cowboys/Panthers game there were 2 official reviews at the end of the game, not sure why this was never was even considered by the refs. Cannnot review judgement calls. Ref judged Baker would have been out. There was never a chance for it to be reviewed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 It was not called a TD. Therefore, no review. Not reviewing isn't in question, it's the NON-CALL of a TD. But they got around it by saying there was no way of knowing if he would have come down inbounds, so therefore, no TD, not reviewable. That's why Mangini said, well, look at it. Not because it would be reviewed and overturned. But "look at it", as in you guys are blind and stupid. We got outplayed, but we also got scr*wed. Anyone who thinks Watermelon Haid to (insert Colts receiver of choice HERE) would not have had that called a TD is nutsy. I've been saying that all day, that is if it were Payton to Harrison the ref would not have even blinked before raising his arms and giving Harrison a pat on the butt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mawaeman Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Cannnot review judgement calls. Ref judged Baker would have been out. There was never a chance for it to be reviewed. How about the Tuck call that your pretty boy brady got away with in the snow was that a "BAD JUDGEMENT CALL" or was that the refs at their best? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 How about the Tuck call that your pretty boy brady got away with in the snow was that a "BAD JUDGEMENT CALL" or was that the refs at their best? It was the correct call. Want to say it is a bad rule? Go ahead. I do not care. The NFL has yet to change the rule. Which suggests it is the best possible one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mawaeman Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 It was the correct call. Want to say it is a bad rule? Go ahead. I do not care. The NFL has yet to change the rule. Which suggests it is the best possible one. PLEASE! would it have been the correct call if it was the oakland QB! Yeah it was the correct call because your team benefited from it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 PLEASE! would it have been the correct call if it was the oakland QB! Yeah it was the correct call because your team benefited from it! Yeah, it would have. The correct call is the correct call. Either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Yeah, it would have. The correct call is the correct call. Either way. It was the correct call to not use replay - but it was a bad call. The NFL needs to learn how to keep the replay system simple yet make it more effective. They should just let an upstairs boothman stop the game on close plays and end it. There would not be that many stops in play. But the NFL loves leaving loopholes and grey area rules out there for the benefit of the gambling community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.