JetCane Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 They will have Hester standing in the Endzone trying to return extra points. LockeJet ________________________ LMAO This would have been a potw nom if it were posted here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Bethel Johnson. Marquis Hill. Chad Jackson. Owned. And btw, those short kickoffs did us just fine yesterday when we walked out of foxboro with the win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharrow Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If we win the turnover battle, we can win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Bethel Johnson. Marquis Hill. Chad Jackson. Bethel - Yeah...no doubt. Hill - Yeah..fast approaching. Chad - Too early to lump in there yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If we can beat Tom Brady we can beat "Sexy Rexy" We basically need to play against Chicago how we played against New England. Stop the run (take away one collapse by the D on Dillons run and NE had only 93 yards on 24 carries) and put pressure on Brady (or in this case Grossman). Keep this game in the high teens / low 20's and the Jets have a good shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-E-T-S Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If we win the turnover battle, we can win. We need to dominate the turnover battle. If we do, we have a decent chance. By domination I mean +2 (preferably +3) or higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 If we can beat Tom Brady we can beat "Sexy Rexy" We basically need to play against Chicago how we played against New England. Stop the run (take away one collapse by the D on Dillons run and NE had only 93 yards on 24 carries) and put pressure on Brady (or in this case Grossman). Keep this game in the high teens / low 20's and the Jets have a good shot. Haha, look at how much the tune has changed after one game after the bye week. We were killing the defense for weeks, but now we're expecting them to go out there and win games for us. It looks like the 3-4/4-3 doesn't matter at all, it's about having an attacking game plan on defense. I hope Mangini and Sutton keep this philosophy the rest of the way out. Who cares if we give up a few big plays here and there because we got burned on a few mistakes. We'll get those big plays on defense so it more than balances out, and plus, if we get good offensive production and stay aggressive on offense, it'll make our aggressive D even better. Things are looking up for Jets fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 We basically need to play against Chicago how we played against New England. Stop the run (take away one collapse by the D on Dillons run and NE had only 93 yards on 24 carries) and put pressure on Brady (or in this case Grossman). Keep this game in the high teens / low 20's and the Jets have a good shot. Is there any game Jet fans don't want to "take away a play or plays" to improve their stats? Bottom line, the Pats rushed for 142 yards against the Jets yesterday. It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-E-T-S Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Is there any game Jet fans don't want to "take away a play or plays" to improve their stats? Bottom line, the Pats rushed for 142 yards against the Jets yesterday. It is what it is. But... the patriots only scored 14 points. It shows that our defence played well enough for us to come away with a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Is there any game Jet fans don't want to "take away a play or plays" to improve their stats? Bottom line, the Pats rushed for 142 yards against the Jets yesterday. It is what it is. Not, like 24 carries and 93 yards for a 4 yard average is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Is there any game Jet fans don't want to "take away a play or plays" to improve their stats? Bottom line, the Pats rushed for 142 yards against the Jets yesterday. It is what it is. And it is what is that the Jets defense did an outstanding job except for one play. So your telling me if the Patriots had won and did what the Jets did you wouldn't be tuting the Patriots' horn? Bull**** and don't try to say you wouldn't be because we know you Tx we know how you switch around things. It is what it is? 17-14 is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Not, like 24 carries and 93 yards for a 4 yard average is bad. Enough to win and that's all you need. Limit a team to under 100 yards rushing and pressure the QB into mistakes and you have one hell of a chance to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Not, like 24 carries and 93 yards for a 4 yard average is bad. The Jets rush defense gave up an average of 5.9 yards per attempt yesterday. Yea, that's a real good job stopping the run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Is there any game Jet fans don't want to "take away a play or plays" to improve their stats? Bottom line, the Pats rushed for 142 yards against the Jets yesterday. It is what it is. Not much has been said about the yards given up, but it wasnt like we shut them out. They had about what the Jets D has averaged on the ground, which isnt good. Brady had a bunch of yards more than CP. Looking at the stats page, its hard to understand how they didnt score more points. A couple of my pals on the Canes board said they did well with Brady as their FFL QB so go figure. Hey if we throw out the last 37 years, the Jets are the reigning SB Champs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 The Jets rush defense gave up an average of 5.9 yards per attempt yesterday. Yea, that's a real good job stopping the run. Aside from one run, actually, it is, and if were the Pats you'd be saying the exact same thing. Switching it up as always Tx. Boy after the Jets beat the Pats and you can't give credit to the defense which played really well it really shows what kind of person / fan you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Aside from one run, actually, it is, and if were the Pats you'd be saying the exact same thing. Switching it up as always Tx. Boy after the Jets beat the Pats and you can't give credit to the defense which played really well it really shows what kind of person / fan you are. The Jets D made plays. It might not have been an artisitic beauty, but they made plays. They got the job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 The Jets rush defense gave up an average of 5.9 yards per attempt yesterday. Yea, that's a real good job stopping the run. You stupid troll. Weren't you babbling about two "fluke passes" in the last Jets-Pats game that you said shouldn't count? How are two plays flukes yet 1 isn't? That was the longest run in the BB era, I consider that flukey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 The Jets D made plays. It might not have been an artisitic beauty, but they made plays. They got the job done. Exactly. We weren't graet but we made enough plays to win and if we make enough plays to beat New England we can make enough plays to beat Chicago because both offenses are similar. Both teams need to run the ball to win because well here's the one difference, New England has Brady and Chicago has Grossman. Chicago's weakness on offense is Grossman's young and inexpeirenced play. New England's is the lack of no #1 and maybe a #2 receiver. Play Chicago like we played the Pats (although, hopefully we can get more then 1 INT against Grossman) and the final score will be in favor of the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 The Jets D made plays. It might not have been an artisitic beauty, but they made plays. They got the job done. I wouldn't go as far to say the Jets D "made all the plays". What they did do however, was confuse the hell out of Brady, kept pressure on him for most of the game, and utilized the run blitz (Maroney was stuffed 2 times behind the LOS on a run blitz) very effectively. Outstanding defensive game plan to say the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jd67 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 The Jets have done a great job of playing as a team. Despite personnel not ideally suited to their new defensive scheme, they have been stout the last few weeks. The Bears are not without faults. Grossman can be rattled. But the real reason for that is the inconsistent play of our O line. You are right, we will need the run to set up the pass. And if our O line shows up, we can do that against your defense. If not, well, trouble. Bears fans are realistic, and know we play to the level of our competition. I believe the Jets are a better team than the Dolphins one that beat us, and better than the AZ team that scared us. However, I believe the culprit in both of those games was overconfidence. I don't see that same overconfidence repeating itself just yet. Since the Jets are a better team, we should play better than in those games. It should be a close one. My call.......... Bears 27 Jets 21 (puts a push on the bookies) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I wouldn't go as far to say the Jets D "made all the plays". What they did do however, was confuse the hell out of Brady, kept pressure on him for most of the game, and utilized the run blitz (Maroney was stuffed 2 times behind the LOS on a run blitz) very effectively. Outstanding defensive game plan to say the least. That is all I am saying. They looked, *gulp* like the 2001 Patriots D. They made plays when they had to. They made the Patriots twice settle for FGs instead of TDs. The timely strip of Gabriel. I would give them props for the pick but that was just a horrible throw. They got the job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 That is all I am saying. They looked, *gulp* like the 2001 Patriots D. They made plays when they had to. They made the Patriots twice settle for FGs instead of TDs. The timely strip of Gabriel. I would give them props for the pick but that was just a horrible throw. They got the job done. Which pick, the one that counted or the one that didn't? Initially, the one that counted seemed like it came from pressure. Watching the replay and highlights, it seems like Brady thought Maroney was going to hitch up and instead he continued across the field. Meaning the ball was thrown where he wanted, but way behind Maroney and right to EColeman who was standing right back there. The one that didn't count really came from pressure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Which pick, the one that counted or the one that didn't? Initially, the one that counted seemed like it came from pressure. Watching the replay and highlights, it seems like Brady thought Maroney was going to hitch up and instead he continued across the field. Meaning the ball was thrown where he wanted, but way behind Maroney and right to EColeman who was standing right back there. The one that didn't count really came from pressure. Only Jets fan want to remove plays or make excuses for them, not Pats fans. No matter how you look at it, it was an INT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Only Jets fan want to remove plays or make excuses for them, not Pats fans. No matter how you look at it, it was an INT. I don't want to remove anything. You're the one trying to remove 150 (or was it 131?) yards of Pennington's passing. I want to look at the play and see why it happened. If it was because the defense was in his face and he rushed I'm happy. It wasn't, just miscommunication between Brady and Maroney, other than the extent that Brady was forced to hit the hot reciever. It happens to everybody, but the only thing the Jets had to do on the play was catch the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonEJet Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 The Jets rush defense gave up an average of 5.9 yards per attempt yesterday. Yea, that's a real good job stopping the run. Hey Tex How's that prediction of the Pats going 8-0 in the AFC East coming along for ya'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Hey Tex How's that prediction of the Pats going 8-0 in the AFC East coming along for ya'? Congrats JonE, it only took you 4 friggn' years to finally get a Pats-Jets prediction correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 1- The NYJ have done a good job protecting the ball, and not committing penalties (bad calls dont count). I want to see a good Leon Washington package and a new Brad Smith play or two. 2- Mangini and Sutton need to turn the blitzers loose again- Rhodes needs to have a monster day 3- Kicking away from Hester HAS to be the strategy. It's the best way to take him out of the game. Westhoff better know better than to kick it to him, and we'll need a good day from the kicking teams to compete. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYy72C4cHJs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jets22 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Hey Tex How's that prediction of the Pats going 8-0 in the AFC East coming along for ya'? About the same as his Jets/Pats prediction last week ...I believe he said it wouldn't be close 38-10 maybe ?? or as god as his Rutgers Prediction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybones Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Grossman's head will spin when he see's what Mangini throws at him. Jets pull out a nice win at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xcel2NuFX Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Said the same thing before the Jaguars game but I just don't think the Jets matchup good against smash mouth football. Chad needs to stay on his feet to be effective and I am affraid the bears can expose a very inexperienced DLine regardless of how they've played so far. The Jaguars were the only team we faced that had a front 7 on defense that I could compare to the bears and that matchup obviously didn't work out well for us. If we can play a defensive football game and win the special teams matchup we could definetly beat any football team though. The parity in the NFL makes it impossible to predict anything these days so I'm hoping we can continue to play inspired football and surprise some more people this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Any given sunday. If we can run the ball and stop the run and get pressure on Grossman. We can win this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackDiamond Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Any given sunday. If we can run the ball and stop the run and get pressure on Grossman. We can win this game. True enough. He gets happy feet when people are around. But then again, if you can get to the QB, disrupt his rhythm, you can beat anybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Stay with the aggressive defense- the games Grossman has looked real bad in that I have saw he has not held up under pressure. Turnovers are going to be crucial - we need to win that battle. Bears playing two straight on the road and traveling should have some effect unless I am way off the mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Any given sunday. If we can run the ball and stop the run and get pressure on Grossman. We can win this game. After coming off their biggest win in years, why are the Jets a 7 point underdog AT HOME to the Bears? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 After coming off their biggest win in years, why are the Jets a 7 point underdog AT HOME to the Bears? Unless you are a gambler what difference does it make who is favored anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.