afosomf Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Sorry 6th rd picks are more likely to have zero impact than a high 2nd rounder. Sorry the chances of picking up a Brady or T Davis are very slim. If Badway wanted another 6 rd pick over the 38th pick HE is a Dumber M'F'ker than i initially thought. Jolley still sucks, this is no upgrade over Becht. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Sorry 6th rd picks are more likely to have zero impact than a high 2nd rounder. Sorry the chances of picking up a Brady or T Davis are very slim. If Badway wanted another 6 rd pick over the 38th pick HE is a Dumber M'F'ker than i initially thought. Jolley still sucks, this is no upgrade over Becht. So afo, do you like the trade or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mean Papi Green Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 coleman was a fifth, Trevor Johsnon was a 7th, Derrick Ward was a seventh, and Rashard washington was a seventh they were all drafted last year by Bradway and all contributed to the team, if their scouts find some diamonds in the rough we can very likey find a few guys that can contribute this year as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Jolley still sucks, this is no upgrade over Becht. I was with you all the way up until this statement. You lose credibility when you add a statement that makes no sense. Becht was awful, Jolley is an upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Wasn't a certain New England qb a sixth round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetgreen13 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 coleman was a fifth, Trevor Johsnon was a 7th, Derrick Ward was a seventh, and Rashard washington was a seventh they were all drafted last year by Bradway and all contributed to the team, if their scouts find some diamonds in the rough we can very likey find a few guys that can contribute this year as well darrel mcclover was a 7th as well. but the point is, bradway preferred two 6th rounders over the 38th pick. to bank on 6 rounders making the team is fool's gold. banking on those same 6th rounders being real contributors is arrogance on the part of bradway. he should have taken the 38th pick. period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 darrel mcclover was a 7th as well. but the point is, bradway preferred two 6th rounders over the 38th pick. to bank on 6 rounders making the team is fool's gold. banking on those same 6th rounders being real contributors is arrogance on the part of bradway. he should have taken the 38th pick. period. he didnt prefer 2 6th rounders over the 38th,,,he preferred 2 6th rounders and the 47th over JUST the 38th... Jets may not see a huge difference in 38 to 47 and feel extra picks can be used to maybe parlay a move into extra picks in earlier rounds, a 5 and a 6 for someone they like in the upper part of 5th round etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 22, 2005 Author Share Posted April 22, 2005 Wasn't a certain New England qb a sixth round pick. read my post Dick4, i mentioned Brady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 22, 2005 Author Share Posted April 22, 2005 coleman was a fifth, Trevor Johsnon was a 7th, Derrick Ward was a seventh, and Rashard washington was a seventh they were all drafted last year by Bradway and all contributed to the team, if their scouts find some diamonds in the rough we can very likey find a few guys that can contribute this year as well MPG- your point please, the players you listed are stiff as boards!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 22, 2005 Author Share Posted April 22, 2005 I was with you all the way up until this statement. You lose credibility when you add a statement that makes no sense. Becht was awful, Jolley is an upgrade. Jolley was so good he was 3rd TE on a terrible raider team. I think the strong NC sun has corrupted your thought process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetgreen13 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 he didnt prefer 2 6th rounders over the 38th,,,he preferred 2 6th rounders and the 47th over JUST the 38th... Jets may not see a huge difference in 38 to 47 and feel extra picks can be used to maybe parlay a move into extra picks in earlier rounds, a 5 and a 6 for someone they like in the upper part of 5th round etc... six in one hand, a half a dozen in the other. the jets should have the 38th pick. not the 47th & two 6th rounders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Jolley was so good he was 3rd TE on a terrible raider team. I think the strong NC sun has corrupted your thought process. It may have, but I'm in Albany. There aren't too many people who don't view Jolley as an upgrade over Becht. Maybe not a big enough upgrade to warrant the equivalent of a high third round pick, but an upgrade nevertheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 if you say Jolley isn't an upgrade over Becht then you have demostrated that you have no friggin idea what you are talking about. Congrats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 the jets should have the 38th pick. not the 47th & two 6th rounders. Maybe Bradway is shooting for the best damn Practice Squad in the NFL. That's exactly where those 6th-round picks will end up, if they are not cut outright. BTW, it will be very interesting to see what players come off the board 38-46. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Maybe Bradway is shooting for the best damn Practice Squad in the NFL. That's exactly where those 6th-round picks will end up, if they are not cut outright. BTW, it will be very interesting to see what players come off the board 38-46. tex how the friggin hell can you say that crap when Tom Brady was a 6th round pick - without that 6th round pick who would you jerk off to every day? Manny? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 tex how the friggin hell can you say that crap when Tom Brady was a 6th round pick - without that 6th round pick who would you jerk off to every day? Manny? My nominee for post of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 tex how the friggin hell can you say that crap when Tom Brady was a 6th round pick - without that 6th round pick who would you jerk off to every day? Manny? Come on bit, be serious. A 6th-round pick like Brady comes along once in a Blue Moon. You think the Pats thought Brady was going to be the player he is today? No friggn' way. That selection was for a back-up QB and nothing more. So what the chances those 6th round picks even make the Jets 53-man roster? 10%, 20%?????? And then whats the chances that one of those picks is a starter or major contributor? Probably less than 10%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 in terry's world draft picks always get first chance to make the roster - don't be surprised if one or both players make the team we are talking about a man that gave Alan Harper about 50 undeserved chances to make the team, based purely on his draft status - when Terry makes a pick, that guy just doesn't get cut too often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardSeymour Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 http://www.drafthistory.com/rounds/round_6.html Sure, Tom Brady was a 6th rounder, however that was an unusual confluence of circumstances: a highly comptetent FO, horrible misevaluation of his talent by the league at large, and sheer dumb luck. Lets look at the 6th rounders taken in 2001 and 2002 164 Miami Brandon Winey T Louisiana State 165 Cleveland Michael Jameson SS Texas A&M 166 Arizona Bobby Newcombe WR Nebraska 167 Atlanta Randy Garner DE Arkansas 168 Cincinnati Riall Johnson OLB Stanford 169 San Francisco Cedrick Wilson WR Tennessee 170 Jacksonville Chad Ward G Washington 171 Dallas Daleroy Stewart DT Southern Mississippi 172 Seattle Josh Booty QB Louisiana State 173 Detroit Jason Glenn OLB Texas A&M 174 Tampa Bay Jameel Cook FB Illinois 175 Carolina Dee Brown RB Syracuse 176 Kansas City Alex Sulfsted G Miami, O. 177 Miami Josh Heupel QB Oklahoma 178 Buffalo Tony Driver FS Notre Dame 179 San Francisco Rashad Holman CB Louisville 180 New England Arther Love TE South Carolina State 181 Pittsburgh Rodney Bailey DE Ohio State 182 Pittsburgh Roger Knight OLB Wisconsin 183 Tampa Bay Ellis Wyms DT Mississippi State 184 Oakland Chris Cooper DT Nebraska-Omaha 185 New Orleans Mitch White T Oregon State 186 Washington Mario Monds DT Cincinnati 187 Miami Otis Leverette DE Ala.-Birmingham 188 Miami Rick Crowell LB Colorado State 189 Minnesota Carey Scott CB Kentucky State 190 Denver Kevin Kasper WR Iowa 191 San Francisco Menson Holloway DE Texas-El Paso 192 Tennessee Dan Alexander RB Nebraska 193 Indianapolis Jason Doering FS Wisconsin 194 Baltimore Joe Maese C New Mexico 195 Buffalo Dan O'Leary TE Notre Dame 196 Buffalo Jimmy Williams CB Vanderbilt 197 St. Louis Francis St. Paul WR Northern Arizona 198 Green Bay David Martin TE Tennessee 199 Tennessee Adam Haayer T Minnesota 200 New England Leonard Myers CB Miami 173 Houston Demarcus Faggins CB Kansas State 174 Carolina Keith Heinrich TE Sam Houston State 175 Detroit Chris Cash CB Southern California 176 Buffalo Kevin Thomas CB Nevada-Las Vegas 177 Minnesota Nick Rogers OLB Georgia Tech 178 San Diego Matt Anderle T Minnesota 179 Dallas Tyson Walter C Ohio State 180 Jacksonville Clenton Ballard DT S.W. Texas State 181 Cincinnati Marquand Manuel FS Florida 182 Indianapolis David Pugh DT Virginia Tech 183 Indianapolis James Lewis DB Miami 184 Atlanta Kahlil Hill WR Iowa 185 Arizona Josh Scobey RB Kansas State 186 New Orleans J.T. O'Sullivan QB Cal-Davis 187 Tennessee Justin Hartwig C Kansas 188 N.Y. Giants Wesly Mallard OLB Oregon 189 Oakland Keyon Nash DB Albany State, Ga. 190 Houston Howard Green DT Louisiana State 191 Denver Jeb Putzier TE Boise State 192 Washington Reggie Coleman T Tennessee 193 Tampa Bay John Stamper DE South Carolina 194 Seattle Craig Jarrett P Michigan State 195 Baltimore Lamont Brightful CB Eastern Washington 196 New Orleans John Gilmore TE Penn State 197 Oakland Larry Ned RB San Diego State 198 Philadelphia Tyreo Harrison MLB Notre Dame 199 Chicago Adrian Peterson RB Georgia Southern 200 Green Bay Mike Houghton T San Diego State 201 San Francisco Mark Anelli TE Wisconsin 202 Pittsburgh Lee Mays WR Texas-El Paso 203 Chicago Jamin Elliott WR Delaware 204 Indianapolis Brian Allen RB Stanford 205 St. Louis Steve Bellisari DB Ohio State 206 Baltimore Javin Hunter WR Notre Dame 207 Baltimore Chester Taylor RB Toledo 208 Dallas Deveren Johnson WR Sacred Heart 209 Baltimore Chad Williams SS Southern Mississippi 210 Chicago Bryan Fletcher TE UCLA 211 Dallas Bob Slowikowski TE Virginia Tech So that's, what, 76 draft picks? among them Jeb Putzier, Rodney Bailey, and Cedrick Wilson. Stunning success rate, that. Since you guys have such hard-ons for 6th rounders now, let me be the first Pats fan to suggest that your team should consider moving down from 57 to 64 for the Patriots 6th rounder. Heck, we could throw in our '06 6th too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 in terry's world draft picks always get first chance to make the roster - don't be surprised if one or both players make the team Hey, maybe both players make the roster and play significant roles. Of course that can happen. All I am doing is basing my comments on the historical percentages of all 6th-round picks. Now tell me bit, would you rather that the two 6th-rounders or the #38th overall pick? I know what I would prefer. :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetgreen13 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 in terry's world draft picks always get first chance to make the roster - don't be surprised if one or both players make the team we are talking about a man that gave Alan Harper about 50 undeserved chances to make the team, based purely on his draft status - when Terry makes a pick, that guy just doesn't get cut too often. all that is true. so why don't i feel any better about bradway requesting two 6th rounders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetgreen13 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 all that is true. so why don't i feel any better about bradway requesting two 6th rounders? oh yeah, now i remember. because it does'nt make any friggin sense!!! welcome to the world of terry "the dope" bradway!!! lucky us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardSeymour Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 2000 had a stunning success rate in the 6th round: Tom Brady, Marc Bulger, Mike Anderson, Dhani Jones, Mario Edwards, Jeno James, and Adalius Thomas all went in the 6th round that year. That might be the most impressive 6th round haul in a long, long, long time. That was in 39 picks. Throw in Putzier, Bailey, and Cedrick Wilson and the '01 and '02 drafts. So we have 115 draft picks and by my count 10 solid hits. That's an 8.7% success rate, and I think that number is skewed pretty high by the sensational 6th round of 2000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudcat21 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 There aren't too many people who don't view Jolley as an upgrade over Becht. Jolley is a superior receiver but Becht is the much better blocker. Since we are a run oriented team, blocking may be more important. We also did pretty good with no receiving TE's last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dickkotite Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 This rican has got the right idea. assmop is just angry because he took his wifes name upon marrige. who knows what will happen. jolley is better than becht, when you look at the stats the stats dont say how many DROPS the two had. coleman was a fifth, Trevor Johsnon was a 7th, Derrick Ward was a seventh, and Rashard washington was a seventh they were all drafted last year by Bradway and all contributed to the team, if their scouts find some diamonds in the rough we can very likey find a few guys that can contribute this year as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 2000 had a stunning success rate in the 6th round: Tom Brady, Marc Bulger, Mike Anderson, Dhani Jones, Mario Edwards, Jeno James, and Adalius Thomas all went in the 6th round that year. That might be the most impressive 6th round haul in a long, long, long time. That was in 39 picks. Throw in Putzier, Bailey, and Cedrick Wilson and the '01 and '02 drafts. So we have 115 draft picks and by my count 10 solid hits. That's an 8.7% success rate, and I think that number is skewed pretty high by the sensational 6th round of 2000. Gee, RS, you only consider starters that make full time contributions to be successful 6th round draft picks? I didn't realize that rosters were only 22 players deep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Non of us are GM's especially not Seymour. Then again who needs a GM that just steals material from kffl and pawns it off as his own ideas. That being said this draft has a lot of interesting prospects expected to go late in this draft that are raw athletes and can add something on special teams as well as add depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Non of us are GM's especially not Seymour. Then again who needs a GM that just steals material from kffl and pawns it off as his own ideas. Is this Round 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Is this Round 2? What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Bottom Line The value at 38 is much higher than 47. Now lets say, Justin Miller slips to rd 2, and we want to trade up from 38 to san frans pick to nab Justin. Throw in a 4th rd pick and its easy cake, we would then get Miller But trying to trade from 47 to 33 will be much harder than from 38 to 33. I think Bradway made this deal with the 47 and not 38 assuming that Dyson would sign. Well he was wrong!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Jets & Ham Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 First off, I would have taken the higher 2 over the two 6's ... lets get that right out of the way Having said that, here's how I view the 6's and the deal Bradway opted for instead This now gives the Jets three 6's ... in order for Bradway to come out a big winner in this trade and justify his opting for the additional 6's, he now has to find a QUALITY STARTER in RD 6 NOT A ROLL PLAYER NOT A SPECIAL TEAMS DEMON NOT A QUALITY BACKUP A QUALITY STARTER!!!!! Bradway now has three 6's to play with ... obviously that was his preference over a higher 2 ... FINE ... but now he has to turn one of those three 6's into a QUALITY STARTER ... if he fails to do so, then he made the wrong choice Simple as that ... he clearly trusted his ability to parlay three 6's into better value than a higher 2 ... FINE ... but in order to make that preception a reality, he has to land at least ONE QUALITY STARTER in RD 6 CASE CLOSED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 2 6s and a 5 could get you a 4th round pick...who knows what they are thinking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 This now gives the Jets three 6's ... in order for Bradway to come out a big winner in this trade and justify his opting for the additional 6's, he now has to find a QUALITY STARTER in RD 6 NOT A ROLL PLAYER NOT A SPECIAL TEAMS DEMON NOT A QUALITY BACKUP A QUALITY STARTER!!!!! Bradway now has three 6's to play with ... obviously that was his preference over a higher 2 ... FINE ... but now he has to turn one of those three 6's into a QUALITY STARTER ... if he fails to do so, then he made the wrong choice Simple as that ... he clearly trusted his ability to parlay three 6's into better value than a higher 2 ... FINE ... but in order to make that preception a reality, he has to land at least ONE QUALITY STARTER in RD 6 CASE CLOSED Hammer, just to play devil's advocate here. In Seymour's above post, he gave a pretty good analysis that the success rate of finding starters in the 6th round is 8.7%. And you think Bradway can come through at 33% to find a starter in the 6th? Good luck on that one. Personally, I think his odds are better at finding 3 players who make the roster and contribute somewhat during the course of the year. In any case, both scenarios present very long odds and percentages for Mr. Bradway. And you are right, he should have taken the 38th and ditched the two 6th-rounders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Jets & Ham Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 Hammer, just to play devil's advocate here. In Seymour's above post, he gave a pretty good analysis that the success rate of finding starters in the 6th round is 8.7%. And you think Bradway can come through at 33% to find a starter in the 6th? Good luck on that one. Personally, I think his odds are better at finding 3 players who make the roster and contribute somewhat during the course of the year. In any case, both scenarios present very long odds and percentages for Mr. Bradway. And you are right, he should have taken the 38th and ditched the two 6th-rounders. At the risk of sounding arrogant, I don't care what the odds are ... you give ME three 6's to play with and I am hitting on one future starter with three swings And if you think I'm lying I'll prove it ... I'll take that challenge ... when the draft has ended remind me to list three players I would have drafted in RD 6 {who were still on the board for the Jets in each spot}, and see if I don't nail one future starter :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetgreen13 Posted April 22, 2005 Share Posted April 22, 2005 2 6s and a 5 could get you a 4th round pick...who knows what they are thinking?maybe. but, now we need to find a GM that thinks he's as clever in the late rounds as bradway does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.