PatsFanTX Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr.php Don't go there mate! I would take Coles on the Pats anyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 And hear I thought we were enjoying a TX free Friday. Stupid thread BTW.... there aren't 38 receivers better than Coles in football and Cotch isn't the 8th best. Interesting the QB link wasn't provided. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/qb.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harris5214 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 that system or w/e lost all credibility when i saw coles ranked so low but it seems like a joke to see tory holt ranked that low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer76 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 Disclaimer: DPAR and DVOA include all passes intended for the receiver, both complete and incomplete. Catch % represents the percentage of passes to this receiver completed. This is a reference to incomplete passes, not dropped passes: dropped passes are not specified in publicly available play-by-play, and unfortunately we cannot yet correct for this. We cannot yet fully separate the performance of a receiver from the performance of his quarterback. Be aware that one will affect the other. These statistics measure only passes thrown to a receiver, not performance on plays when he is not thrown the ball, such as blocking and drawing double teams. "Points scored due to plays" is based on a larger model of how yards are translated into points, and is not a measurement strictly of touchdown passes. In layman's terms that we can all understand: Disclaimer These stats are actually pretty useless in terms of the idea that most true facts that comprise them are not available. In reality some schmuck who wanted to try and prove a point somehow devised this formula and realized it was flawed in every way shape and form. But rather than just toss them for their complete and utter uselessness, we figured that somewhere out there, a troll would post it as his/her basis for an outrageous claim that some WR is actually better or worse than reality. So we felt we'd bundle this bullsh*t in a nice wbsite and let you have at it!! Have a nice day!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 In layman's terms that we can all understand: Disclaimer These stats are actually pretty useless in terms of the idea that most true facts that comprise them are not available. In reality some schmuck who wanted to try and prove a point somehow devised this formula and realized it was flawed in every way shape and form. But rather than just toss them for their complete and utter uselessness, we figured that somewhere out there, a troll would post it as his/her basis for an outrageous claim that some WR is actually better or worse than reality. So we felt we'd bundle this bullsh*t in a nice wbsite and let you have at it!! Have a nice day!! LOL.....the best part is if a QB misses his receiver it affects the receivers stats and vice versa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 8, 2006 Author Share Posted December 8, 2006 that system or w/e lost all credibility when i saw coles ranked so low but it seems like a joke to see tory holt ranked that low. Look where Chris Chambers is ranked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 Look where Chris Chambers is ranked? Chambers stinks. The word overrated comes to mind when I hear his name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 Look at Cotchery.. 8th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 that system or w/e lost all credibility when i saw coles ranked so low but it seems like a joke to see tory holt ranked that low. sometimes with metrics like this you need a pretty big sample size and 12 games really isn't that big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 Look where Chris Chambers is ranked? Is this where you get all your information?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 8, 2006 Author Share Posted December 8, 2006 Is this where you get all your information?? No, the first thing I do is make up information, then I go to this site next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
16G-MONEY Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 Don't go there mate! I would take Coles on the Pats anyday. Thank you for your honesty... you didn't expect football intelligence from TX... did ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 Thank you for your honesty... you didn't expect football intelligence from TX... did ya? You have to post more. I'm always honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
16G-MONEY Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 You have to post more. I'm always honest. Oh I've seen you post... sorry... I'll rephrase... Thank you ONCE AGAIN for being honest on a fan site chock full o blind followers of the Patsies with little football knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justincredible Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 I think I'd have trouble coming up with 10-12 WRs I'd take over Coles, let alone 38. These rankings are worthless, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Oh I've seen you post... sorry... I'll rephrase... Thank you ONCE AGAIN for being honest on a fan site chock full o blind followers of the Patsies with little football knowledge. Thanks for the kind words mate. Believe it or not there are only about 5 or 6 Pats fans here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks for the kind words mate. Believe it or not there are only about 5 or 6 Pats fans here. Yeah but tx is worth like 10 patsy fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justincredible Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Thanks for the kind words mate. Believe it or not there are only about 5 or 6 Pats fans here. Yeah, but TX has the arrogance and presence of about 100 more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Yeah but tx is worth like 10 patsy fans. Yeah, but TX has the arrogance and presence of about 100 more. Weird! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Yeah but tx is like 10 worthless patsy fans. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 No, the first thing I do is make up information, then I go to this site next. At least you are honest about it I guess. POTW nomination. And I think I'm going to sig it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 At least you are honest about it I guess. POTW nomination. And I think I'm going to sig it too. LOL!!! I second the motion for POTW for this post!!!!!! No, the first thing I do is make up information, then I go to this site next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 At least you are honest about it I guess. POTW nomination. And I think I'm going to sig it too. That is worthy sig material for a Jets fan and also an excellent nomination for POTW. Love him or hate him, Tx never disappoints! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharrow Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Better than Torry Holt, awesome. Better than Deion Branch too, just like we said. Brad Smith #2 in wide recievers rushing, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theinlawjosie Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 There aren't more than a handful or receivers I would pick before Coles but Torry Holt is definitely one of them...whoever made this list is out of their minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 You have to post more. I'm always honest. Sometimes to a fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.