madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 i dont think we would go RB if we aquired the 6th pick without recieving a RB, id have to put my money on alan branch, 6"6 330 perfect for the 3-4 DE... richard seymour anyone? Branch is a NT. Seymour is a DE. Different players. Branch is still great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harris5214 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Branch is a NT. Seymour is a DE. Different players. Branch is still great. branch is a 3-4 DE in the NFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 branch is a 3-4 DE in the NFL no chance. the reason he's a top 5 pick is that he's a legit 3-4 NT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harris5214 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 no chance. the reason he's a top 5 pick is that he's a legit 3-4 NT. maybe occasional 3-4 NT, he is best suited for 4-3 DT or 3-4 DE. http://www.footballsfuture.com/2007/prospects/alan_branch.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 maybe occasional 3-4 NT, he is best suited for 4-3 DT or 3-4 DE. http://www.footballsfuture.com/2007/prospects/alan_branch.html thats a really bad scouting service. branch isn't ANYWHERE NEAR a good enough pass rusher to be a top 5 pick as an end. The reason he's a top 5 pick is that he's a NT. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I think Barton nailed it....we can't make this trade until we know who we would attain with the #6 pick. If there is someone that T and Mangini feel would greatly improve our team than you might have to pull the trigger. Also we have to remember that replacing Vilma will not be easy, he is the QB of our defense and is responsible for changing plays/making adjustments pre snap...that is NOT an easy thing to do and it was Vilma's ability to do this that got him so much praise from Mangini. I really think Vilma is off limits and I'm not exactly mad about that, the guy busts his ass, has great character, has been given a lot of responsibility early and never faltered and is a tremenedous athlete/leader. That is someone you build a team around, not trade away for a RB w/ injury problems and a player we cannot even be guranteed. Lets give Vilma some credit for what he has done in his 3 years here, and also respect his work ethic and smarts and recognize he will almost def. be better next year than he was last year....and he was not bad at all, just not the superstar he once was. Good post. I would be stunned if tangini dealt Vilma this off-season, for the reasons you mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harris5214 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 thats a really bad scouting service. branch isn't ANYWHERE NEAR a good enough pass rusher to be a top 5 pick as an end. The reason he's a top 5 pick is that he's a NT. Period. he is a 3-4 DE if we were to draft him, howmany 3-4 DE are drafted to pass rush? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 A 6'6 NT would need to be like 360-370 lbs. And it's tough for anyone to carry around that kind of weight, I don't care who you are. Also, what 3-4 NT have you seen that is 6'6" tall? Too difficult to gain leverage down low. Even that giant, Ted Washington, is 6'5, and he's been carrying around 375 lbs on that frame. Branch is ~330 lbs at 6'6. Slim some college softness off him in camp & he's a rock-solid 6'6/320. With his talent, he'd be a terror of a 3-4 DE at that size. OR you can plump his fat ass up to 350+, make him even slower, kill his stamina (which will already be challenged with the move from college to pro), and then we can all cry about the letdown DT we took with a top pick again. Vilma5114's right. He's a DE in the 3-4. You're just looking at his weight, which would be fine for a 3-4 NT if he was 6'2" give or take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 A 6'6 NT would need to be like 360-370 lbs. And it's tough for anyone to carry around that kind of weight, I don't care who you are. Also, what 3-4 NT have you seen that is 6'6" tall? Too difficult to gain leverage down low. Even that giant, Ted Washington, is 6'5, and he's been carrying around 375 lbs on that frame. Branch is ~330 lbs at 6'6. Slim some college softness off him in camp & he's a rock-solid 6'6/320. With his talent, he'd be a terror of a 3-4 DE at that size. OR you can plump his fat ass up to 350+, make him even slower, kill his stamina (which will already be challenged with the move from college to pro), and then we can all cry about the letdown DT we took with a top pick again. Vilma5114's right. He's a DE in the 3-4. You're just looking at his weight, which would be fine for a 3-4 NT if he was 6'2" give or take. That goes against every scouting report i've seen on him and why people view him as a top 5 pick. If he's a DE he's not a top 5 pick. He's not a good enough pass rusher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 That goes against every scouting report i've seen on him and why people view him as a top 5 pick. If he's a DE he's not a top 5 pick. He's not a good enough pass rusher. You mean like that sackmaster Richard Seymour, who's reached the 6-sack plateau once in his multi-pro-bowl career (and that was with 8)? I now expect a laundry-list of nose tackles suitable for the 3-4 that were taken with as high of a pick. 3-4 DE's are run-stoppers first and if they get to the QB it's from coverage sacks. They're not pass-rushers. The OLB's (or blitzing ILB's/DB's) are the pass-rushers. I know you know this, so I'm confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 You mean like that sackmaster Richard Seymour, who's reached the 6-sack plateau once in his multi-pro-bowl career (and that was with 8)? I now expect a laundry-list of nose tackles suitable for the 3-4 that were taken with as high of a pick. 3-4 DE's are run-stoppers first and if they get to the QB it's from coverage sacks. They're not pass-rushers. The OLB's (or blitzing ILB's/DB's) are the pass-rushers. I know you know this, so I'm confused. Seymour was a much better pass rusher then branch was in college and one of the reasons he was drafted high was that aspect of his game. You can get 3-4 DE's who can stop the run later in the draft. If a guy is a top 5 overall pick he better be able to do both or play NT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Branch's ideal position is as a 4-3 DT. Enough of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Branch's ideal position is as a 4-3 DT. Enough of this. If thats the case then the jets shouldn't be going after him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 If thats the case then the jets shouldn't be going after him. so we agree. Carriker is a better fit. 6/6"/295-300 lbs coming out of college is plenty big for a 3-4 DE and he's a LOT faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSFAN5180 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Vilma is a proven player.#6 can be a BUST. Portis would be worth looking at BUT not for Vilma. Mangini WILL NOT trade his best defensive player.Besides Portis is often injured.Turner or Betts might be a viable option for alot less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 If the Jets were to pick up # 6, trade down to, say # 10, pick Carriker, and pick up a late second. In this draft there seems to be a lot of 2nd rounders that are going to be able to play. IMO at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 so we agree. Carriker is a better fit. 6/6"/295-300 lbs coming out of college is plenty big for a 3-4 DE and he's a LOT faster. 6 might be high for him though... He'll probably be there at 10 or 12... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemens&theJets Posted February 19, 2007 Author Share Posted February 19, 2007 what if it was Vilma #37 and Betts #6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 6 might be high for him though... He'll probably be there at 10 or 12... I think so. Which is why I'd rather keep our #25 overall pick & take a pick between 10-14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I think so. Which is why I'd rather keep our #25 overall pick & take a pick between 10-14.It would have to be a pick between 10-14 + a player for Vilma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Branch would be a great 3-4 DE. He could play NT, but he's a better fit at DE because he's so tall. I heard him on espn, says he's slimming down to 320. He faced double teams and still destroyed them, he's a special player. He'd be a great fit at 3-4 end because he'd command double teams, unlike Kimo who gets blocked by 1 arm. He's a 4-3 DT too, very versatile, very much like Seymour. I've never seen this Justin Harrell guy play, but there seems to be alot of good things being said about him. Combines - this week. Here's where players make their money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 there is only one player that i wan to go that high for and that is adrian peterson. and if he goes before the 6th i'm backing off of that trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 i mean it is a no brainer. Vilma is a great 4-3 LB but average in the 3-4. Portis when healthy is a top 5 back. it is basic trading Vilma for Branch and Portis i hope we pull the trigger. by the way where did you hear about this trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 ANTWAN APPLEWHITE DE/OLB sandiego st. he is also a consideration in later rounds if we dont get a quentin moses type early Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 I posted a version of this rumor a couple of days ago. The original rumor was on hailredskins.com it had us giving up vilma and our 25 pick for betts, their first round and fourth round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 Washington is stupid. Really stupid. However, if they do this, they will be Corky Thatcher stupid. A top ten running back + moving up 19 spots in the draft in exchange for....a guy that is too small to be effective in our defensive system. I can't believe some of you voted against this. You're mental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.