BoomBoomMancini Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 He would be our answer to Ben Watson.. I really think he would be great in our system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 You're absolutely out of your mind if you think we're taking a tight end in the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Boom boom....like....give it up dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoomBoomMancini Posted March 6, 2007 Author Share Posted March 6, 2007 I know, but I really think Olsen would be a star here.. Chad desperatley needs a big target to throw to in the endzone.. Olsen would be a very smart pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENSMACKS Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 sign randy mcmicheal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Well since Ben Watson is crap why the hell would we want the NEXT Ben Watson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 You're absolutely out of your mind Thats all you needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 sign randy mcmicheal Tangini will only sign McMichael if they are into wife beaters. NOT !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 BoomBoom - I agree 100%. If Olsen is there the Jets will pick him. He would take care of two needs 3rd WR and TE. We could then run a lot of two TE formations and stretch plays to either side. Seriously, I can't see how you could think this post is nuts. It makes perfect sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 The Jets will never utilize the TE position fully until Chad is gone. His arm isn't strong enough to gun the deep seam and our coaches are smart enough to not even try it. It's not like Chris Baker sucks, he's actually a very good receiving TE - just not in our scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 With the major holes we need to fill, you want a TE ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uart Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I don't know who the Jets are taking in the first round, but I am not holding my breath for someone exciting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Revisionist's history: DO NOT TAKE A TE WITH THE FIRST PICK EVER AGAIN!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Particularly one with neither the skill nor desire to block for anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 If we draft Olsen that will be a huge waste of a pick in the first round. He is a good receiving te, but we really need some beef on the o and d line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 BoomBoom - I agree 100%. If Olsen is there the Jets will pick him. He would take care of two needs 3rd WR and TE. We could then run a lot of two TE formations and stretch plays to either side. Seriously, I can't see how you could think this post is nuts. It makes perfect sense. We hardly throw to our tight ends as it is..they're a non-factor..I want to upgrade other areas first..we need lineman and a cornerback.. Taking a tight end makes no sense.. Stretch what?Pennington is the problem with the stretching,not our tight ends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREEN FIEND Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Olsen is going to be a beast...just not for us. PASS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Well since Ben Watson is crap why the hell would we want the NEXT Ben Watson? Whatta ya TALKIN about Mike why Tex told me that Ben Watson is TWICE the receiver that Coles is....not one of his high points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 The New York Jets should NOT draft Tight Ends. Greg Olsen is a nice combine story and yes he came from the U and yes he played in my old hometown of Wayne, NJ (Wayne Hills) and he would sell TONS of jerseys but... no thanks. He's not as good as Jeremy Shockey and he doesn't have Shockey's attitude either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 The New York Jets should NOT draft Tight Ends. Greg Olsen is a nice combine story and yes he came from the U and yes he played in my old hometown of Wayne, NJ (Wayne Hills) and he would sell TONS of jerseys but... no thanks. He's not as good as Jeremy Shockey and he doesn't have Shockey's attitude either. that could be a good thing about not having Shockey's attitude...hey no way the Jets should EVER draft a TE in the 1st round again-they are never worth what you use up on them-they don't produce enough except in rare situations every decade or so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENSMACKS Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Tangini will only sign McMichael if they are into wife beaters. NOT !!! being a wife beater in the nfl is like you are me getting a parking ticket. if thats the worst he has done i can live with it. women can be a pain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoomBoomMancini Posted March 7, 2007 Author Share Posted March 7, 2007 The Jets will never utilize the TE position fully until Chad is gone. His arm isn't strong enough to gun the deep seam and our coaches are smart enough to not even try it. It's not like Chris Baker sucks, he's actually a very good receiving TE - just not in our scheme. Chad can throw the deep seam across the middle of the field pretty well.. Its the sideline to sideline throw that really require the arm stregnth. Olsen is a BIG TARGET something Chad hasn't had. Chad can get away with those floaters with a 6'6 260 lb man there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoomBoomMancini Posted March 7, 2007 Author Share Posted March 7, 2007 The Jets will never utilize the TE position fully until Chad is gone. His arm isn't strong enough to gun the deep seam and our coaches are smart enough to not even try it. It's not like Chris Baker sucks, he's actually a very good receiving TE - just not in our scheme. that could be a good thing about not having Shockey's attitude...hey no way the Jets should EVER draft a TE in the 1st round again-they are never worth what you use up on them-they don't produce enough except in rare situations every decade or so... Heath Miller would have been nice.. Better than Jolley and Nugent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Chad can throw the deep seam across the middle of the field pretty well.. Its the sideline to sideline throw that really require the arm stregnth. Olsen is a BIG TARGET something Chad hasn't had. Chad can get away with those floaters with a 6'6 260 lb man there. Wow BoomBoom I'm very impressed. Great post. This is very true. Baker is servicable at TE - but doesn't compare to what Olson could become. What the heck POTW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I sincerely doubt that Olsen will there at #25. His combine results were very flashy (especially his reported 4.51 in the 40 yard dash). Someone will bite. But, especially now that NE has stocked up on them, there might be one or two very tempting WRs from which to choose. Its not the way I would like to see them go, but having signed Coleman and assuming Carriker is long gone, WR may represent the BAP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 I sincerely doubt that Olsen will there at #25. His combine results were very flashy (especially his reported 4.51 in the 40 yard dash). Someone will bite. But, especially now that NE has stocked up on them, there might be one or two very tempting WRs from which to choose. Its not the way I would like to see them go, but having signed Coleman and assuming Carriker is long gone, WR may represent the BAP. Yep, the mock drafts I have seen that have the Bungles taking him seem realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 When push comes to shove I think the Bengals will take a defensive player. But if Lynch is not there for the Packers then I think they will take Olsen (or Jarrett). Favre can still hit that middle seem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Well considering the fact that the Jets have not utilized the TE as a major part of their offense since the days of Shuler and Johnny Mitchell I doubt the Jets, even if Olsen was there would be chosen. Olsen had a great combine which makes me even more leary. I like the combine for some things but the combine isn't everything. I would want to see alot of film on this guy and see if he really is a football player and if he has a passion for the game.or (Mike Mamula for example). I do though like the idea of having a guy like a Gates, or a Gonzalez being a part of this offense. I though would have alot of concerns about Olsen. The Jets should go OL or DL with the first pick if a top guy is out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Olsen had a great combine which makes me even more leary. I like the combine for some things but the combine isn't everything. I would want to see alot of film on this guy and see if he really is a football player and if he has a passion for the game.or (Mike Mamula for example). I do though like the idea of having a guy like a Gates, or a Gonzalez being a part of this offense. I though would have alot of concerns about Olsen. He is a talented player, but didnt show much heart and passion. Then again, as I posted previously, not many UM offensive players played with a lot of heart last year under coker. He strength is as a receiver but he wasnt much of a blocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.