oxscott Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Sorry, no link yet, just saw it on the bottom line on ESPN2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Sorry, no link yet, just saw it on the bottom line on ESPN2 The Raiders 4-12 next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 The Raiders 4-12 next year. With the first pick of the 2008 NFL draft, the Oakland Raiders select... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oxscott Posted March 9, 2007 Author Share Posted March 9, 2007 With the first pick of the 2008 NFL draft, the Oakland Raiders select... . . . The USC Trojans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Looks like Lamont Jordan will never be the feature back anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oxscott Posted March 9, 2007 Author Share Posted March 9, 2007 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2792972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'brickMangoldJets Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 I think Raiders can win 5-6 games if they play the same D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 Good thing Jordan restructured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rizzock Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 how is this a bad move? we just signd a pro bowl O-linemen, a good change of pace RB, we got a new TE from the bengals and we still have alot of draft picks and the same defense with less rookies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 how is this a bad move? we just signd a pro bowl O-linemen, a good change of pace RB, we got a new TE from the bengals and we still have alot of draft picks and the same defense with less rookies. It wasnt... dont mind the others... Rhodes said himself he wants to be the 2nd RB somehwere not the main guy. So you now have Lamont and Rhodes as a 1-2 punch... pretty good pickup as long as you dont overpay him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rizzock Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 It wasnt... dont mind the others... Rhodes said himself he wants to be the 2nd RB somehwere not the main guy. So you now have Lamont and Rhodes as a 1-2 punch... pretty good pickup as long as you dont overpay him. he wasnt overpaid at all. I think the raiders offseason is shaping up well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 he wasnt overpaid at all. I think the raiders offseason is shaping up well. Yeah it would only get better if your owner would go away... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted March 9, 2007 Share Posted March 9, 2007 It wasnt... dont mind the others... Rhodes said himself he wants to be the 2nd RB somehwere not the main guy. So you now have Lamont and Rhodes as a 1-2 punch... pretty good pickup as long as you dont overpay him. if would be a good pick up if rhodes didn't suck. he won't do anything on that offense, he is not a cornerstone by any means. He'll be lucky to get 3.5 ypc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Jordan is coming off a MCL tear. Great singing by the Raiders to get a solid RB in camp. Add this to the griffith signing and the Raiders have done a little something to boost that run game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterNorth09 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 Jordan is coming off a MCL tear. Great singing by the Raiders to get a solid RB in camp. Add this to the griffith signing and the Raiders have done a little something to boost that run game. Dominic Rhodes is an average running back. He should be paying Peyton Manning a 90% commision for the contract he got from Oakland. Any RB can put up good numbers playing in that ultra-spread out offense. I like the Griffith signing though. Problem is Oakland still has a horrific offensive line. Robert Gallery has been a disaster and the same has to go for Jake Grove. Paul McQuistan and Kevin Boothe might develop into decent Guards but that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 This move makes ZERO sense to me when he could've went to pair up and still start in Tennessee with LenDale White or he could've went to Buffalo and started OR he could've went to the Giants and shared time with Brandon Jacobs. Makes no sense to me but obviously the Raiders are starting to see the side LaMont Jordan that 124 has known since the beginning. He's nothing but a reserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterNorth09 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 This move makes ZERO sense to me when he could've went to pair up and still start in Tennessee with LenDale White or he could've went to Buffalo and started OR he could've went to the Giants and shared time with Brandon Jacobs. Makes no sense to me but obviously the Raiders are starting to see the side LaMont Jordan that 124 has known since the beginning. He's nothing but a reserve. You make Rhodes out to be like he's some kind of superstar who could have written his own ticket anywhere. Put Lamont Jordan on the Colts and he puts up similar numbers to Rhodes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 11, 2007 Share Posted March 11, 2007 You make Rhodes out to be like he's some kind of superstar who could have written his own ticket anywhere. Put Lamont Jordan on the Colts and he puts up similar numbers to Rhodes. Only if it was the 4th quarter after CM carries it 20-25 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.