Jump to content
Want to remove all ads? ×

What is it Skank Fans? Good hitting or Poorr hitting?

PFSIKH

By PFSIKH
in Baseball

Good Hitting or Poor Pitching?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Good Hitting or Poor Pitching?

    • Red Sox pitching sucks because they suck.
      3
    • Red Sox pitching sucks because the Yankees can hit
      6

Recommended Posts

PFSIKH

PFSIKH

Posted
Posted

Listen, you all need to come to a consensus about this weekend's series.

Was the Red Sox performance because the pitching staff sucks.

Or

The result of a deep and powerful line-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PFSIKH

PFSIKH

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The axiom that you win with pitching still holds. The Yankees pitching was worse.

Could it be the same all year? Maybe. Maybe not.

Good point. Other then Wang, it is not like you have 3-4 potential Cy Young winners coming back. If Moose was 30 and not 38 and Pavano was able to pitch every 5 days as oppossed to every 5 months, the Yanks could write this series off. However, if they do not get any better they are in serious trouble unless they can consistently score 6 runs a game and they very well could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
madmike1

madmike1

Posted
Posted
Good point. Other then Wang, it is not like you have 3-4 potential Cy Young winners coming back. If Moose was 30 and not 38 and Pavano was able to pitch every 5 days as oppossed to every 5 months, the Yanks could write this series off. However, if they do not get any better they are in serious trouble unless they can consistently score 6 runs a game and they very well could.
Mussina would've been the best pitcher on Boston last year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blackout

Blackout

Posted
Posted
Good point. Other then Wang, it is not like you have 3-4 potential Cy Young winners coming back. If Moose was 30 and not 38 and Pavano was able to pitch every 5 days as oppossed to every 5 months, the Yanks could write this series off. However, if they do not get any better they are in serious trouble unless they can consistently score 6 runs a game and they very well could.

Pavano didn't pitch last december

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shawn306

shawn306

Posted
Posted

Bottom line....

Yanks pitching other than Pettite was awful.

The bullpen couldn't hold a lead (Mo included) and throwing out the like of Kartsens, Wright, Vizcaino and the rest of the bullpen made the Sox look alot better than they really are.

No complaints though. The Yanks did the job in beating on Schilling, Beckett and Dice-K. The Sox did a better job though.

That could all change this weekend in the Bronx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PFSIKH

PFSIKH

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Uh no. He was better than Schilling and Beckett and nothing's changed. He'd be boston's no 2 starter.

Judging by your evaluation of the unmeasurable depth's of Yankee starting pitching, your opinion has zero value.

Moose and his 9.00 ERA would not even crack the Sox starting 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PFSIKH

PFSIKH

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I think Wang had a fluke season. There is no way he can continue to have so much success without striking anyone out. If you allow the ball to be put in play 95% of the time, it is eventually going to bite you in the ass.

I am sure he is looking forward to the Yankees 13th out of 14 teams ranked fielding.

Good news though......Mientkiewicz leads the league in kick saves after digging Jeter's grounder that turned Ortiz' double play. I guess he rushed it to beat Big "Fleet 'o Feet" Papi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MasonJet

MasonJet

Posted
Posted

Does it matter? They gave $100 million to a pitcher just so he could win games like this one, and he gives up 6 runs in 7 innings. If I was a Sawx fan I would be expecting more bang for my buck.

And yes, I realize he won. But he won't be facing Chase Wright the next time he pitches against the Yankees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GimmeShelter

GimmeShelter

Posted
Posted
Does it matter? They gave $100 million to a pitcher just so he could win games like this one, and he gives up 6 runs in 7 innings. If I was a Sawx fan I would be expecting more bang for my buck.

And yes, I realize he won. But he won't be facing Chase Wright the next time he pitches against the Yankees.

LOL who will he be facing Igawa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PFSIKH

PFSIKH

Posted
  • Author
Posted
LOL @ HIS 9 ERA. Whats that over 6 innings? Great Argument.

Oppossed to your logic of selecting a guy that is on the DL was rocked in his one start versus a guy 12 years younger and 4-0.

Yeah, you are a sharp one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
madmike1

madmike1

Posted
Posted
Please, the BPS factor is a small % of the overall OPS. I can't believe you would even make such a statement.

pWNED.

you make that joke in every thread and it's retarded in every one. I get it. I'm an idiot because i think OPS is an important stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scott Dierking

Scott Dierking

Posted
Posted
I and other people who understand the way baseball stats should be viewed, use OPS the way other people use BA, RBI's, Runs ect becuase it's a more much acctuare measure of how good a hitter that player is than those stats.

And you harp on me on sentence structure?

I and other people are laughing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company

Site Sponsor

MetLife Stadium Tailgate

NY Jets Podcast

NY Jets Podcast

DMCA Page

  • -- DMCA Page
    • ×
    ×
    • Create New...